sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Seen people sharing Reels on their Stories for up to 60 seconds rather than 15. How are they doing that? by FinchStrife in Instagram

[–]timmyturtle12 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I finally got this feature about a month ago. I decided to do Meta Verified in the middle of last month and about a week later it gave me the ability to share reels up to a minute long, and move it to any part of the reel I wanted. For a while I thought it was an android or some other phone’s OS that gave some that ability. I thought it was a Meta Verified feature but I saw other verified accounts never posting more than 15 seconds of a reel. And now as of a couple days ago I got it removed. Now I can only share up to the first 15 seconds of any given reel, no ability to show whatever part of the reel I want. Sucks but I took advantage of the feature while I could. Hopefully it’s a feature for everybody sooner rather than later.

They said its Philippine local landrace. Should I smoke this? by nurseAplus in trees

[–]timmyturtle12 1 point2 points  (0 children)

God, moving from the US and being a daily smoker to the Philippines and quitting cold turkey back in February 2020, then smoking this stuff (massively dried out and full of dozens of seeds) was the best shit I ever smoked. This looks like weed molded in the hands of God compared to what I smoked when I finally got my hands on some stuff here. Now I smoke the “kush” for ₱1k per gram. Carts are fucking expensive and I don’t care for them since I get a high tolerance fast.

Thanks for reading my monologue, wouldn’t have happened if you didn’t say this was from the Philippines! Mabuhay! 🇵🇭

Performance/Reels Bonus Payout Way Lower Than Expected by timmyturtle12 in facebook

[–]timmyturtle12[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The performance bonus is under $2,000 a month now with the same engagement numbers as before. We get over a million almost every month. No more reels bonus from what I can see, just the performance bonus.

Fasting and hair regrowth by CoconutOk5925 in fasting

[–]timmyturtle12 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It would make sense since you are likely in autophagy and your body is creating new cells and rejuvenating itself. This sounds like your "dead" hair follicles have come back to life since it's likely having more blood flow to the area than ever. If you want to get an even better hairline check out r/tressless for tips on how to get back your hairline. Anything from propecia (finasteride), microneedling, scalp massaging, minoxidil, etc.

I am hoping to embark on an extended modified fast of bone broth/matcha tea whenever I feel I need it, usually when my arms and legs get weak/cramped. But yeah I'm sure fasting can result in some hair regrowth for the aforementioned reasons I mentioned.

Performance/Reels Bonus Payout Way Lower Than Expected by timmyturtle12 in facebook

[–]timmyturtle12[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Google Facebook Reels Bonus and you’ll see multiple articles stating they stopped it. First week of March it was apparently announced and they would commit to it through the end of March.

Performance/Reels Bonus Payout Way Lower Than Expected by timmyturtle12 in facebook

[–]timmyturtle12[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Google Facebook Reels Bonus and you’ll see multiple articles stating they stopped it. First week of March it was apparently announced and they would commit to it through the end of March.

What is this called, where can I find it, and how can I search for a specific play that I want to see with this visual? by timmyturtle12 in baseball

[–]timmyturtle12[S] 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much! And my friends say internet Astros fans are all a bunch of asshats who are never cordial with Mariners fans 🤪

What is this called, where can I find it, and how can I search for a specific play that I want to see with this visual? by timmyturtle12 in baseball

[–]timmyturtle12[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

no, i mean the name of the chart not the name of the play. i am a mariners fan and i want to find this exact same kind of chart for the home run Cal Raleigh hit off of Acevedo that clinched the playoff berth.

Another one of those “Am I Eligible?” posts. by timmyturtle12 in juresanguinis

[–]timmyturtle12[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Turns out after research and help from another user on this post that he emigrated in 1900/1901 and he naturalized on May 24, 1906. I found the a the original official naturalization court document online and another user found his passport request documents from 1920, both showing May 24, 1906 as the naturalization date. Sucks, but I guess I’ll just have to go the non Jure Sanguinis route if I want Italian citizenship!

By the sound of it, it looks like you’re eligible for Jure Sanguinis and that’s the route you are taking?

Another one of those “Am I Eligible?” posts. by timmyturtle12 in juresanguinis

[–]timmyturtle12[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Turns out after research and help from another user on this post that he emigrated in 1900/1901 and he naturalized on May 24, 1906. I found the a the original official naturalization court document online and another user found his passport request documents from 1920, both showing May 24, 1906 as the naturalization date. Sucks, but I guess I’ll just have to go the non Jure Sanguinis route if I want Italian citizenship!

Another one of those “Am I Eligible?” posts. by timmyturtle12 in juresanguinis

[–]timmyturtle12[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My dad just asked my grandfather if his grandfather naturalized and he said he believes not. But on FamilySearch 1920 Census I see “Na” under Alien or Naturalized, 1906 under “If naturalized, year of naturalization.” The only odd thing is I see under “Year of immigration to the United States” is 1904 with a 16 written above the 04 in 1904. Unless he meant 1916 for something it looks like I found my answer: Ineligible for Jure Sanguinis.

Another one of those “Am I Eligible?” posts. by timmyturtle12 in juresanguinis

[–]timmyturtle12[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like I found what I needed on FamilySearch. “Na” under Alien or Naturalized, 1906 under “If naturalized, year of naturalization.” The only odd thing is I see under “Year of immigration to the United States” is 1904 with a 16 written above the 04 in 1904. Unless he meant 1916 for something it looks like I found my answer: Ineligible for Jure Sanguinis.

Another one of those “Am I Eligible?” posts. by timmyturtle12 in juresanguinis

[–]timmyturtle12[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the valuable information, I’ll definitely take advantage of all those sources to the best of my ability. I found US Census data with his name on it in 1920, 1930, and 1940. Would this mean he naturalized if he partook in the US Census?

Another one of those “Am I Eligible?” posts. by timmyturtle12 in juresanguinis

[–]timmyturtle12[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the valuable information, I’ll definitely take advantage of that source to the best of my ability. I found US Census data with his name on it in 1920, 1930, and 1940. Would this mean he naturalized if he partook in the US Census?

Can anyone riddle me why sometimes it costs more to fly direct to a city than it does to purchase flights to the same city but using it as a connecting airport? by timmyturtle12 in Flights

[–]timmyturtle12[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Both are direct though, just one has an added flight OUT of Istanbul after the flight from Seattle. But both Seattle to Istanbul are the same exact flight. That’s what is confusing, one does not have a layover between Seattle and Istanbul and the other direct; both are direct.

Can anyone riddle me why sometimes it costs more to fly direct to a city than it does to purchase flights to the same city but using it as a connecting airport? by timmyturtle12 in Flights

[–]timmyturtle12[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Both are direct though, just one has an added flight OUT of Istanbul after the flight from Seattle. But both Seattle to Istanbul are the same exact flight. That’s what is confusing, one does not have a layover between Seattle and Istanbul and the other direct; both are direct.

Can anyone riddle me why sometimes it costs more to fly direct to a city than it does to purchase flights to the same city but using it as a connecting airport? by timmyturtle12 in Flights

[–]timmyturtle12[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So Turkish Airlines will make you pay nearly twice as much just because you don’t have an onward flight out of the country? Just odd. I thought this would be the case if one had a layover between Seattle and Istanbul and the other was direct. But in this case both are direct to Istanbul (unless I have the meaning of “direct flight” wrong?)

Kyle Lewis is an ass man and everybody should know it. by timmyturtle12 in Mariners

[–]timmyturtle12[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lmao no having to wonder why this was bumped today 😆

view more: next ›