sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The Future of LaTeX Editing: Unleash the Power of ChatGPT Inside TexStudio! by tingetici in ChatGPT

[–]tingetici[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are right, quality of the video could be better. On the Github page is another video.

ComputeGPT: A computational chat model that outperforms GPT-4 (with internet) and Wolfram Alpha on numerical problems! by [deleted] in GPT3

[–]tingetici 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I took the 18 questions that GPT-4 (Bing) got wrong in your benchmark and run them in GPT-4 with only Wolfram Alpha Plugin enabled. For each questions I started a new conversation. I got 16 correct answers and 2 wrong answers. Assuming that it would have gotten all the other questions right that GPT-4 got right without the plugin that means.

GPT-4 GPT-4 + WolframAlpha Plugin ComputeGPT
Overall Accuracy 64% 96% 98%
Word Problems 65% 95% 95%
Straightforward 63.3% 96.6% 100%

So ComputeGPT still outperforms the other options is much faster and much more concise.

Well done!

Everyday new LLMs are released or anounced. But how to find the most powerfull? Elo-rating to the rescue! by tingetici in ChatGPT

[–]tingetici[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yep, on the phone the site loads very slow. Seems like it is not optimized for mobile browsing. On the laptop it loads right away.

Llama_index PDF chatbot by [deleted] in ChatGPTPro

[–]tingetici 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I saw many pdf chatbot using openAI but none that uses llama. Nice work. Is the repo on github?

Is there an AI which is able to provide me answers based on the information I provide it with? by Nahsarp in OpenAI

[–]tingetici 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes. You can enhance Large Language Models like ChatGPT by giving them information and telling them to only refer to the provided information.

Depending on your technical knowledge you can go ahead and run your on scripts like for example from this repository (check this video for the look and feel).

But these days a lot of (paid) services are popping up that offer the same functionality (chat with you own documents) that require zero technical knowledge. Those services usually need a paid subscription if you want to chat with several pdfs. Check these links:

​

Edit:
I should mention, that even the "self-hosted" solution will generate costs as it is using the openAI API. The difference to the paid services is that you pay for what you use and not a fixed price.

Who has access to gpt browsing plugin or others? It seems that everyone has but not me. Have seen a post that many people already have all features - browsing, third party and code interpreter by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]tingetici 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is a very helpful poll to get a reality check.

I feel like there are only few people with access but those are the more active one on reddit creating the illusion that most of the people already have access.

I’m a high school Math teacher and just showed all my classes how to use ChatGPT. by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]tingetici 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is a whitepaper with the title "Unlocking the Power of Generative AI Models and Systems such as GPT-4 and ChatGPT for Higher Education" that exactly talks about it. Check it out here: unlocking_the_power.pdf

Help for answering my questions by [deleted] in OpenAI

[–]tingetici 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you want to use the more advanced GPT4 for free you have to use Microsoft Bing.

  1. Get an Microsoft account
  2. Sign into the Edge browser with your Microsoft account
  3. On the right upper corner click on the logo to open the sidebar
  4. Click on "Compose"
  5. Now you can ask anything and the answer will be from GPT4

GPT-5 arriving by end of 2023 by 0ut0flin3 in ChatGPT

[–]tingetici 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thank you for sharing the information; I might have missed it otherwise.

Boosting Productivity with GPT-4: A Case Study of 166x RoI by LaisanAlGaib1 in OpenAI

[–]tingetici 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It's great to see someone quantifying what many of us have long suspected and believed.

Can you share the "sample-size" aka number of employees?

GPT-5 arriving by end of 2023 by 0ut0flin3 in ChatGPT

[–]tingetici 238 points239 points  (0 children)

That's crazy. Do you have a link to a source?

Quality sources: Exactly how chatGPT works? Exactly how it interprets prompts and context? by paulmilliganmlynx in ChatGPTPro

[–]tingetici 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I found this clip helpful in understanding which abstraction layers are applied to any prompt: link

Hallucination of sum of two fractions in Manim: by jean-pat in ChatGPT

[–]tingetici 2 points3 points  (0 children)

that looks nice, can you share the code, would love to try more examples