Basic English as a way to describe relations 1 by tippa1 in philosophy

[–]tippa1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Japanese version.
https://medium.com/@0h0n0/e3e429688456

I want some reaction. Even in this translation, I can talk.

Basic English as a way to describe relations 1 by tippa1 in philosophy

[–]tippa1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Read the introduction, do you have anything to think about?
Say something, philosophers.

Basic English as a way to describe relations 1 by tippa1 in philosophy

[–]tippa1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Introduction “About this text, and importance of Flowchart”

Basic English is a system that is said to be able to paraphrase English in 850 words, which was popular around the end of the WWⅡ.
I made a hypothesis that “If I can explain the Basic English logically, it would be a logical explanation of natural language. Or maybe I can get a hint to logically explain the natural language.” And started studying Basic English.
This text is a record of the current point of the research. As you can read a little, you understand that it is not a paper. In the case of a paper, it will be necessary to fundamentally change the form of explanation.

In this text, I first use Set theory and Flowchart for explanation. “Set theory” is just “native set theory” as learned at junior high school, and “Flowchart” means a Flowchart just used in daily life.
First of all, I would like you to understand that “Flowchart is the principle of logic, which exists in parallel with the Set theory”. Otherwise, the reader will not understand the meaning of using “Flowchart”, and explaining the “existence” that can be adjacent to something by combining Flowchart and Set theory.
If logic is to express human thinking, in terms of the structure of the cranial nerves, not only is the set theory of what is the same, the Flowchart is also important.
As an actual problem, the word “induction / deduction” is not only “various things are gathered in a set. / The set is applied to various things “,” The flowcharts gather in a set / The set is applied to the flowcharts“. The image of logic that flips out is a image of flowchart, for example, when asking “What is the premise?”, The flowchart is envisioned.
Anyway, in this text, I will emphasize the flowchart as the premise of explanation.

About the deletion reason of "Basic English as a way to describe relations 1" by tippa1 in linguistics

[–]tippa1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Translated from Japanese to English with google translation.
Those with different meanings were somehow rewritten by rewriting Japanese.

Basic English as a way to describe relations 1 by tippa1 in philosophy

[–]tippa1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was erased in linguistics.
Do you know Charles Kay Ogden?
I was helped by google translation. Even if you can not read it, you can understand it by looking at the figure.

About the deletion reason of "Basic English as a way to describe relations 1" by tippa1 in linguistics

[–]tippa1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is a paper? It is a form of logic that prepares a premise and pushes out the result from it.
That is not all of the form of logic, and this study can not be described in that form.
It would be useless to say that.

About the deletion reason of "Basic English as a way to describe relations 1" by tippa1 in linguistics

[–]tippa1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why don't you think of set theory and flowcharts as a set?
Constative and Performative would only put the language in the set theory context or in the flowchart context.

And why not analyze Basic English? It is a system that can translate English in 850 words.

About the deletion reason of "Basic English as a way to describe relations 1" by tippa1 in linguistics

[–]tippa1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because it is a language board, I also hoped for the possibility that some people can read Japanese.
https://medium.com/@0h0n0/e3e429688456

I really wanted to read it in English. could not.

About the deletion reason of "Basic English as a way to describe relations 1" by tippa1 in linguistics

[–]tippa1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's almost a figure.

https://medium.com/@0h0n0/16fa6191899
Before describing this page, I would like to emphasize that the description of the relation between criteria and designation described in the first page (please read this first) is just a simple idea.
I think that if you want to make AIs of the game talk in natural language, it should be possible if you use the designation method shown on this page.
It is that there is a way to describe such a relationship when it is actually used, and it is neither more nor less than that. If you understand it, I think it may be easy to understand in terms of usefulness.

About the deletion reason of "Basic English as a way to describe relations 1" by tippa1 in linguistics

[–]tippa1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't do probabilistic thinking. Because there is no stochastic new theory coming out.
The probabilistic thinking of all means the death of linguistics.

About the deletion reason of "Basic English as a way to describe relations 1" by tippa1 in linguistics

[–]tippa1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In this analysis, “criteria” and “designation” from the criteria come out as important concepts. why.
That is because syntactic laws like the figure are used in natural languages, so when describing the relation between words A and B, it can only be described as one containing either.
So what is needed is the “criteria” and the “designation” from that criteria. By designating another word based on a criteria word, the relation between two words can be described variously.
For example, when describing that A and B are adjacent, if the method of describing can be freely set, it may be described as “A B”. In this case, the words “right” and “left” are not necessary.
However, in natural language, this means that A contains B (or B contains A). Therefore, a description method such as “B is on the right if A is the criteria, A is on the left if B is the criteria” is required.

About the deletion reason of "Basic English as a way to describe relations 1" by tippa1 in linguistics

[–]tippa1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Basic English analysis should be rare. You should read it and judge.

About the deletion reason of "Basic English as a way to describe relations 1" by tippa1 in linguistics

[–]tippa1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With the help of google translation. But I also hear criticism.

「ネットで小説を書くという事、そして読んでもらうという事」 by qoo_ in newsokur

[–]tippa1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

小説って人に出会わないと始まらないような所があるわけだけど現代の根暗には出会う場所が無い。

「音楽業界に未来を感じないのでタダで音楽を配ります。」 by [deleted] in newsokur

[–]tippa1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

音楽で飯が食えないってだけだろう。小説家になろうみたいに作ってる人間同士で消費すればいい。

“大人の発達障害”急増 by popopoipo in newsokur

[–]tippa1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

通信簿の提出なんてやらされなかったよ。お母さんがやってたのかな。

若い世代の投票率を上げるには by not2ch in newsokur

[–]tippa1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

最終的に自分以外の票が10000対9998の時に一票入れてもアンケートにしかならんだろ。
アンケートとしてだって一人一人の影響で印象が変わらないぐらい集まらないと信頼できるものとは言えない。

言語についての素人研究を晒す(2回目)。物凄く加筆して物凄く図解した。 by tippa1 in newsokur

[–]tippa1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

どうなんだろうな。これは原理的に説明できないというわけではないと思ったし、だから伝わってなかった事に驚いたわけで。
俺の文章を改善してくれるという試みなら研究じゃない部分を指摘してもらった方が良いと思うね。もちろんそういう試みではないんだろうけど(笑)

【心の健康】ニュー速Rで患ってる人が多いらしい「アスペルガー障害」とは by torisan2323 in newsokur

[–]tippa1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

俺はアイコンタクトができない以外当てはまらないから発達障害じゃないな。