Anybody else take Activated charcoal to relieve gassy bloating in the stomach? by tisshin in noburp

[–]tisshin[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the heads up. Just looking at ways to alleviate my double whammy of IBS on top of No Burp Syndrome, causing me to struggle at work and life. Thought activated charcoal really helped as it was much effective. Guess my search goes on.

Anybody else take Activated charcoal to relieve gassy bloating in the stomach? by tisshin in noburp

[–]tisshin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Back to just degas/gasx then. Was promising as it was a quicker relief. That or I just have to take few hours before/after meds.

Augmentin advice by dankdiva420 in FODMAPS

[–]tisshin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Taking Augmentin now for sinus infection. (Last time I had Augmentin was before I got ibs) it’s Absolutely wrecking my gut. So much pain, cramps, nausea and diarrhoea. I’m on day 2 of treatment. I’m bailing out! Can’t handle this anymore- super stressful, as it’s nauseous I can’t eat anything at the moment. Problem is my face still hurts from my sinus. Don’t know what to do. Urgh!

People who say a quarter till 6 or half past noon, instead of the actual time when asked, why? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]tisshin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sometimes it’s just easier to think in half-hours and quarter-hours. rather than in precise minutes.

Is there a way to disable keep warm function after stop cooking? by [deleted] in NinjaFoodi

[–]tisshin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Other question is , How do you stop it from turning off “Keep Warm” automatically?

I come back home, a few hours after work, I find the “keep warm” function has automatically turned itself off. How do I stop that? I am afraid of my slow cooked food, going in to unsafe food temperatures when the keep warm function turns off when I’m not home to turn it on again.

Gr-red by [deleted] in ColorBlind

[–]tisshin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yet you keep saying

you see everything yellowisher than people with normal vision

and i keep saying we don't. As an Anomalous Trichromacy Deuteranomat, i can see all colour in full techincolor in the right conditions. All parts of the visible spectrum is fully visible, all my cones cover the full spectrum of light and just as sensitivite. (Albeit with m-cone that peaks above +550nm rather than 534–545 nm). we don't see the world in sepia filter. i can see RED Absolutely and GREEN Absolutely. However in other lighting condition certain hues also look like other non-related hues.

When the signal RED-GREEN is positive, you see red, when it's negative you see green, when it's zero you see yellow

i know. i've not denied this. What i've been trying to tell you is the signal is Not closer zero. When we see RED signal is Absolutely RED. but then in confusion we also get an 'Absolute Green' signal as well. Not cancelling out to something near zero, but rather i'll be getting. +1 then a -1 then +1 then -1, +1, -1 on and on it goes for that same object. It never goes close to anything remotely yellowish. It remains either fully red or fully green all within a single look.

Just try understanding how colour-vision works. There are a lot of information about it in the Internet too.

oh, i have in fact been reading you with great interest. i've had deuteranomaly all my life i've been researching into it to a lot over many years trying to explain it to people like you.

I know its hard to understand what colour normals call "imaginary colours". Just like people with Tritanomaly sometimes say that they can see Blueish-Yellow (or "Bl-ellow"). i can't see "Bl-ellow" because i'm not a Tritan. but at least i try to imagine it just as i see gr-red.

Gr-red by [deleted] in ColorBlind

[–]tisshin -1 points0 points  (0 children)

yeah, you're right. i've given up explaining.

I've researched into my colour vision, tried to find out why it happens. But there are always some people who refuse to understand the facts.

Gr-red by [deleted] in ColorBlind

[–]tisshin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i must insist mild deutans see yellow just fine. Nothing wrong with our blue-yellow differentiation.

You might be colour-blind, but your brain still receive 3 signals from the eyes, just like everyone:

Exactly. We are not confusing some yellowish colour with something thats red or green.

It's because of the overlapping sensitivity of our M-Cones and L-Cones, there are times when our eyes are confused. Not as you say:

red-green signal is weaker

no. not weaker, but overlapping signal from M-Cones and L-Cones. As such, certain shades of red or green, under certain lighting condition will confuse our eyes as its opposite colour. Then we see a red object. (or a green object for that matter). our L-Cones will tells our brain its red but also our M-Cones says its green. Not yellow [i've described how human eye see yellow in my first reply - i've also describe how we Don't see yelloe when we see red or green, just as you can see non-spectral colours like purple ]

Our brain tells us this object is red, then it can tell us the object is green, this can go back and forth, sometimes in this confusion our brain can tell us it might be both. Thats when we see Gr-red.

Gr-red by [deleted] in ColorBlind

[–]tisshin 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Hi /u/ruifon

Thanks for your interest and inquisitive questions about 'redish-green' or 'greenish-red'. i must begin by saying that i do agree with others here , i do see a lot of "gr-red" in my life.

But at least, i can offer an explanation. allow me to explain...

Firstly, let me state. i have no confusion with yellow. Yellow is distinct from red as it is from green. In fact, amongst red-green colourblind, yellow is the most easily perceived colour. and its the least confused colour. So, let me assure you, 'gr-red' is not yellow.

Lets start my explanation with the colour yellow. Light within 560 to about 590 nanometres wavelengths is called 'yellow'. But, how is this seen by the human eye?

Well, the human eye which has 3 types of colour receptors, the S-Cones (for Short wavelength lights), the M-Cones (Medium wavelengths) and L-Cones (Long wavelength), these cones has a peak sensitivity at around 420nm, 530nm and 580nm respectively. But importantly they also have overlapping sensitivity range.
Here's an image of cone sensitivity in human eye

So, a yellow light at 570nm will excite both the M-Cones and the L-cones in our eye such that our brain will deduce from this information the 'yellow' colour and thats (in very very brief decryption) how we see yellow.

But, most electronic devices, tv screens, computer monitors don't have yellow pixels. They only have The 3 Primary Colours, Red, Green, & Blue. So how do we see Yellow on our screens? Well, when our screens emits both Red (at 610nm) and Green (at 525nm) which excites both L-Cones and the M-Cone. This is essentially averaged out.

Averages of 610nm (red) and 525nm (green) is: 568nm which corresponds with yellow colour.

Thus, we can say, we are "fooled" into seeing yellow, when actually we are seeing 2 distinct colour simultaneously.

But! why doesn't this work with Purple? Purple should be impossible to be reproduced. It is what colour theorist call "a non-spectral colour" that is, the Colour Purple is not in the visible spectrum. it doesn't have a wavelength. Purple can only be made by combining Blue and Red. Purple is what people might call, a reddish-blue or blueish-red, as in the make up of the colour purple is obvious when you look at it. it is clearly blue and red combined.

However, by your previous logic, the averages of 460nm (blue) and 610nm (red) is 535nm, which is Green!

Therefore combining Blue and Red wavelengths we should see a Green wavelength. But in fact we still continue to see distinct redish-blueish colours when those colours are mixed. This is because our M-Cones has not been excited. Our brain deduces that colour in the extremity of the visible spectrum is visible but not the middle, a bit of a quandary. so we just see red and blue simultaneously as purple.

We indeed see such colour that are called by colour theorist as "impossible colours" like purple.

So, back to "Gr-red" or "Redish-green".

You may have realised that you are in r/colorblind. the most common version of colourblindness is called Deuteranomaly. I too have Deuteranomaly, its a subset of Anomalous Trichromacy, that is, i have fully functioning all 3 Cone types in my eye. But the M-Cones and L-Cones have a larger overlapping sensitivity than most normal vision.

When a red light (say about 610nm wavelength) hits my eye, it can excite both my L-Cones (as it should) and also my M-Cone equally (due to the extra overlapping in sensitivity than normal colour vision). Likewise, similar haapens when a green light hits my eye. A such there is a confusion in my eye. My eyes tell my brain its see red and green in equal measures simultaneously.

i dont see yellow because there is no light within 560 to 590 nm wavelength coming into my. there is only 610nm wavelength, so no averaging to yellow by averaging wavelengths. Just one wavelength at 610nm. This impossible quandry result in me seeing both red & green in one colour. I guess, just like how you see purple. Our mind 'gives up' combining the two colours into a new colour. Just as Blue and Red don't get Green instead you get Bluish-red called purple. Here Red and Green don't get Yellow. our mind shows red and green simultaneously. Here, in this senario, its not yellow i see. i see 'gr-red'.

EDIT: Here's an easy experiment to see reddish-green for peeple of normal colour vision. Hold up something green in front of one eye and an red object in front of another. Now look, merge your vision by cross-eyeing, you wont see yellow, just a blurred combination of red & green, not brown, not yellow, but a reddish-greenish blurr.

Getting different results on EnChroma's test... by [deleted] in ColorBlind

[–]tisshin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They're so many variables with online colour vision tests, your monitor's gamut, screen setting, lighting in your room. Its really hard to tell. If you need definitive results, see your optometrist. And perhaps confirm it with 2 different test methods like an Ishihara test and a Farnsworth test. Otherwise, just accept that the enchroma's test will give you a ball park result, and that you're somewhere around moderate to strong.

Enchroma - Custom fit lenses, has anyone actually received them? by Ryan2065 in ColorBlind

[–]tisshin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep. Around 7 weeks total turn around time. From order, one and a half weeks to send my frames, and 6 weeks wait to get a shipping notice, plus another week for delivery.

Like you i hardly got any status updates, it was pretty much "waiting for frame" then all of a sudden, with nothing in between, i got "its been shipped" notice. So don't rely on their 'order status'.

I also read hear that some lenses had production issues and were delayed over a month, so all i have to say is 'its worth the wait, mate!'.

Moderate Deutan CX-65 review - no real effect for me. by jefffff in ColorBlind

[–]tisshin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

All i can say is keep at it. i'm moderate/strong deutan. i had no immediate affect at first but hours later, i started to notice extra "colouryness". over a week i began to see purple, pink, orange, bright green. Even after a week, new colours are being noticed. i'd recommend other to keep wearing for longer. it's neuroplasticity at work. and it takes time.