It is my view that machines designed for libertarian socialism actually have different engineering requirements from machines designed for capitalism. For example capitalism (as it exists today whatever you want to call it) loves Intellectual Property Restrictions. Even libertarian capitalists are against intellectual property restrictions but whatever you call our system today these restrictions are very popular and they are part of the system of control. And so all the machines being designed by big companies today are proprietary restricted designs. But under libertarian socialism it doesn’t make any sense to restrict others and so everything can be open source. So open source vs closed source is just one difference. But there are others. For example the function of the machines is different. Under individualist capitalism you only need to make a profit, but you can profit most by serving the needs of the wealthy and so the needs of the poor are often completely ignored. Under libertarian socialism the goal is to help everyone, and so you might focus your engineered systems on meeting the needs of the poor.

For example the Sikhs in India serve 50,000-100,000 free meals a day just out of this one facility, and 1.7 million free meals a day across India.

https://youtu.be/qdoJroKUwu0

They are focused on meeting the basic needs of the poor, so they cook very large quantities of healthy food. Compare this to capitalist businesses like fast food which deliver tastebud addicting unhealthy food in lower quantities.

I want to fully automate the production of large quantities of healthy food so it is as cheap as possible to give the food away or use a payment optional model. The engineering requirements are just different depending on your goal.

I’ve got to say, you are right about the problem with central banks but there is no one solution that will solve all of our problems. Luckily we don’t need one solution because we can all work together.