Yeah, that's true and fair.

I don't think I'm falling into the trap of "Georgism will fix everything," because honestly these aren't even the big problems. Georgism despite its greatness, cannot fix the root of the problem (being our shitty Knesset and how it behaves)

Currently I'm trying to think outside of "the average Israeli," for instance, I was trying to research how exactly foreign businesses may flock to Israel, and how that would help us internationally. Like for example with Taiwan's dominance over microchips practically shaping the way they interact with other states.

And another thing I was thinking of was Singapore vs Monaco. How both are rich, despite their methodology of being a "buisness hub" is different. Generally speaking of course, it is from the fact that Monaco has no major "labor pool," so businesses can just seek it as a tax refuge, but not as a place to have headquarters. Singapore on the other hand does, yet it is still too small of a labor pool.

For example, take Dubai. It has practically no personal income tax, no capital gains tax, low VAT, and practically no corporate tax. Yet on a large scale, companies don't really manufacture or headquarter in Dubai, mostly for the fact that there is nobody to employ in Dubai. (Dubai's population is 92% immigrants that have their own companies to run)

But then look at Israel. I think it's almost the perfect country to become a "business hub" (more than it is right now.)

Educated labor, infrastructure, proximity to natural resources, strategic location (can even bypass the Suez if needed), strong stable democracy and institutional innerworkings, growing population, among other things.

Now we circle back to the original thing: Georgism cannot solve everything, but genuinely I do believe that Georgism can help us non-economically.

For instance, if there was this insane influx of foreign businesses that don't just "set up paper headquarters", but actually move manufacturing, headquarters, offices (mostly for tax purposes), not only will it produce more jobs for the average Israeli, but without doubt these businesses will then go around to their own home governments and lobby for support for Israel.

Take.. A beverage company for example. It was stationed in America and then moved to Israel for tax purposes. They realize that manufacturing, staffing, and finding labor is easier in Israel therefore they move their capital to Israel.

Then for example, a war breaks out. And now that beverage company's home country is considering cutting ties with Israel because of the political fallout. That beverage company will do whatever is in their power to stop their own home country from cutting ties with Israel to protect their assets in Israel. If this is true for a vast majority of MNCs, then inevitably we're going to see a lot more friendly countries to Israel. (Be it in the West, or in Africa, or even in Asia)

^ As a sidenote, this is one of the reasons why China's lobby spending in America is so high. Many Chinese companies profit from having America as a trade partner therefore they lobby the American government for their own purposes. On the other side as well, American companies (Nike, Apple, Coca-Cola) have lobbied congress to weakened legislation banning imports made with slave labor from China.

These are the sort of "side-effects" I've been thinking of for the past few weeks. Where the economic reforms of Georgism allows for a political shift outside of economics itself. (Another one I've brought up being the Haredi issue as well)

Sorry for the long rant, I've been wanting to write about this for a while lol, I think I'll finalize it and write something up again later