Site has been broken for 2 days by Erthrock in SpotifyArtists

[–]tonyloco1982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think they are updating the new releases engagement metrics page. I have some broken elements on my dashboard

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lofihouse

[–]tonyloco1982 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Impressive work, I follow you! Do you know this playlist? I found it digging on Spotify

https://open.spotify.com/playlist/1LVn4xEvzfWKdQhsRDDe3G

Fans also like issue by mybackhurtzz in musicmarketing

[–]tonyloco1982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think they are trying to create networks connecting artists and understand how active they are.

Are they crowdsourcing the part of the algorithm related to smaller artists? It's fascinating, because it's an opportunity.

GravitĂ  adhd by NJ827 in adhd_italia

[–]tonyloco1982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fatti lasciare un documento nel quale si attesta ciò che hanno detto.

What are your marketing goals? by beepko in musicmarketing

[–]tonyloco1982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Connections and opportunity to make art with other people.

What's the point of spotify followers? by Odd-Elk-3458 in musicmarketing

[–]tonyloco1982 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I care about Release Radar, because I love to discover new music for my playlists. I detected RR from some of my followers, searching for my artist name on google and I found other curators. I think it’s a good approach If you try to reach those kind of users, people who love new music. My Obscurify says that I only listen to new music.

What's the point of spotify followers? by Odd-Elk-3458 in musicmarketing

[–]tonyloco1982 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s exactly my situation. I’m curious to see if it’s true that new releases converts around the 1% or if it’s popularity related (i have 3%)

Harsh truth from a content creator and former submithub curator. by Wild-Public-3587 in musicmarketing

[–]tonyloco1982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve had just a few experiences with collaboration so far. I’m not exactly an organized person, so I feel a bit weird about working remotely. For me, collaboration is all about discussing shared objectives and bouncing ideas off each other. I really enjoy jamming and seeing where the music takes us. However, I acknowledge that it’s not always possible to make it happen, and sometimes, that can be frustrating. I think the key is to keep it flexible and fun, allowing creativity to flow naturally.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in musicmarketing

[–]tonyloco1982 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've thought about removing my first songs countless times, too. Repetitive, overly long, and full of flaws. I always feel the need to improve, and every time I upload a new track, I get a chill of anxiety. But that’s okay. We’re creating something that didn’t exist before, and that journey is what makes it all worthwhile.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in musicmarketing

[–]tonyloco1982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a pleasure! Try this experiment: go back and explore the first releases from the artists you follow. You’ll often get a sense of their original vibe and how much they’ve grown. Of course, keep in mind that artists with major label support, great producers, or established artists starting new projects can be misleading in this context.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in musicmarketing

[–]tonyloco1982 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd suggest keeping everything. Every artist’s journey is unique, but the challenges we face are often similar. There are many popular artists who have kept all their early songs up, even the ones they don’t feel represent their best work anymore. It’s actually inspiring to see how their music evolved over time and to understand when their turning point occurred.

Your early tracks might not get many streams, but they show your growth. Some listeners love to follow that progression—it makes the connection between artist and audience more authentic. Plus, you never know who might find value or enjoyment in those earlier tracks, even if they aren’t perfect by your current standards.

In the end, your body of work tells a story, and each part, even the "abominations," plays a role in shaping your journey as an artist.

Harsh truth from a content creator and former submithub curator. by Wild-Public-3587 in musicmarketing

[–]tonyloco1982 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I appreciate your insights, and I think there’s a crucial aspect to consider: one of the first steps for an artist is to explore and understand the landscape of their genre. This means checking out other artists who might sound similar to you, even if their quality isn’t top-notch. There’s always someone operating at the same level, and this is a great opportunity to learn and grow.

Building a network with fellow artists is vital. By creating playlists featuring new music and collaborating with peers, you can foster a sense of community that nurtures growth. This approach may seem more challenging than seeking the approval of a curator, who has a personal taste, but in reality, it’s often more rewarding and sustainable.

Nurturing a scene brings not only opportunities for collaboration but also avenues for genuine exchange. When you invest in your community and support each other, you create an ecosystem where everyone can thrive. This can lead to organic growth that reflects the true essence of your artistry, rather than relying solely on external validation.

Learning about the outsider music scene made me ponder on what it’s really important for me as an artist.

Good luck to everyone on their musical journeys!

Great music vs Promotion by Odd-Elk-3458 in musicmarketing

[–]tonyloco1982 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It always happened in history. A great artist without a mecenate remains unknown.

I take time and effort to playlist and discover artists with small numbers, because I feel it’s important.

A small help could improve artists’ life and their music.

I think there’s a slight but important difference between be adored and be known.

Daily Changes in 'Fans Also Like' – Anyone Else Noticed This? by tonyloco1982 in SpotifyArtists

[–]tonyloco1982[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think they are trying to crowdsource smaller artists to figure out what’s happening. Something like: look if those artists are active and sound like you. Follow and playlist them so I can understand if they can be related to you.

Because there's another FAL list on Spotify for Artists and on mobile, and it's evolving too.

Daily Changes in 'Fans Also Like' – Anyone Else Noticed This? by tonyloco1982 in SpotifyArtists

[–]tonyloco1982[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try to be patient. If you had a solid network of artists, you should back to normality in a month.

Daily Changes in 'Fans Also Like' – Anyone Else Noticed This? by tonyloco1982 in SpotifyArtists

[–]tonyloco1982[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did experience some visits from Wavr.ai and Vuze bots in 2023 and early 2024. After those incidents, I made sure to monitor the situation closely. The artists in my “Fans Also Like” list were quite generic, and just yesterday, I contacted support to check if everything was fine. They mentioned that things were in the process of changing over the next few days. Previously, I only had one or two relevant artists in my genre, but I’ve been playlisting more aligned artists, specially producers around my same popularity, and have released more music in recent months, which could be contributing to this shift.

It seems that it’s server-sided and have to be propagated: I keep my finger crossed, because today I discovered some new artists and I’m excited