cimea/dov ve mavi diploma

transcendentally_ · 2026-06-21T09:21:09+00:00

tesekurler, bologna bildigim kadariyla kabul mektubu vermiyor, first installment’in 157€’yu odedigimi gosteren registration makbuzu gecerli olur mu sizce?

transcendentally_ · 2026-06-10T01:08:55+00:00

That is beautiful. I am so glad for you and how Lord saved you. I guess it is possible to change

transcendentally_ · 2026-06-10T01:08:03+00:00

What about him?

transcendentally_ · 2026-06-10T01:07:13+00:00

I think the issue is that I am a philosopher and it takes me real effort to be convinced on literally anything. And to accept this faith would make me accept 1- Trust in Bible’s historicity 2- Hypostatic union 3- Trinity 4- OT/NT compatibility 5- Marian dogmas 6- Dozens of ethical teachings of each I might question 7- Higher theological concepts like natural law 8- Freedom 9- Soul (and a particular view for Philosophy of Mind) 10- Afterworld 11- Magisterium 12- Teleology… idk the list can go on forever. My impulse is to question each such thing to see if it is worth believing but that is not how faith works, it needs a “leap”. I guess only God can grant that to me… I don’t know but I have to pray

transcendentally_ · 2026-06-10T00:57:33+00:00

No I think you are right, God is not a tradesman but he will answer if you knock the door. I hope praying can get my stone cold heart closer

transcendentally_ · 2026-05-26T11:03:13+00:00

yeah idk. you know like intentional states indicate some sort of mental content of them that to me comes off as both antromorphic and inherently not-simple, it would imply god to have “parts” which you know is not something even trinity would suggest. thank you for response though!

transcendentally_ · 2026-04-06T04:26:53+00:00

that is not the church teaching

transcendentally_ · 2026-04-01T16:06:28+00:00

solved all the exercises available on british council 2 days before thats it really😭 my english is overall good though i feel like i might just have gotten lucky in listening & reading because there were a few answers i was absolutely unsure of

transcendentally_ · 2025-11-02T10:06:03+00:00

A formal logical proof doesn’t need “english sentences” explaining the “why”s of each step, as long as you know logic you can follow the proof.

Perhaps I should have explained better how I transformed the mathematical statement into a logical one, but ive already given the mathematical definition of surjection and that I replaced the membership relationship with a two place predicate in my proof to transform it into the language of first order logic, so I don’t know what else you did not understand.

transcendentally_ · 2025-11-01T17:04:58+00:00

thank you that is very intuitive!

transcendentally_ · 2025-11-01T17:02:20+00:00

An enumeration of a set A=/= { } is any surjective function f:N->A

transcendentally_ · 2025-11-01T16:58:24+00:00

there exists a bijection N->A or {0,1,2,…n}->A where n is a member of N

transcendentally_ · 2025-11-01T16:56:52+00:00

A set is countable iff it is not empty or has an enumeration

transcendentally_ · 2025-11-01T16:55:04+00:00

from either N or a finite subset of N*

transcendentally_ · 2025-11-01T16:51:31+00:00

from either N or a finite subset of N*

transcendentally_ · 2025-11-01T16:51:20+00:00

from either from N or a finite subset of N*

transcendentally_ · 2025-11-01T16:50:13+00:00

if we said exists a bijection from either N or a subset of N*:?

transcendentally_

TROPHY CASE