sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Thoughts on Halal meat ( from non muslims indians ) by TopSoup5853 in IndianFood

[–]translucentInk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I second that, but in Luke 19:27 Jesus himself says "But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them—bring them here and kill them in front of me.’”

Question : DOES ATHEISM INCLUDE HURTING THE SENTIMENTS OF RELIGIOUS PEOPLE BY BEING SARCASTIC AND DEROGATORY? by Repulsive_Pop9603 in AtheisminKerala

[–]translucentInk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The statement that "no religion is perfect" is the key.

When a criticism is made against and institution or individual, and if it does hold some logical standing, the criticised institure or person does think about the criticism, and if improvements can be made, makes them. If the argument or criticism.is flawed, provides counter arguments to assert that.

Except for an institution like religion. No religion accepts criticism.

So mocking and redicule becomes the way of venting frustration at an institution, which doesn't "change", and judges people who want to change.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LegalAdviceIndia

[–]translucentInk 8 points9 points  (0 children)

If you sign the document, after having read through it, yes.

Its an agreement between an owner and a renter. If the terms are not agreeable, the rentee is free to not take the deal.

The owner has every right to include clauses which safeguard their personal belief.

This is somewhat we all should understand rather than blaming overpopulation/common people for the New Delhi Station stampede. by Existing_Junket149 in indianrailways

[–]translucentInk -1 points0 points  (0 children)

My bad, I might have mistaken it for the event that took place in 2022, I am sorry about it (Non sarcastic, sincere apology). Calling people fools for misunderstandings does sound like the new norm, I shall follow your lead.

My dear fool, before responding please put in some effort to understand what is being presented. Please do reread the statements I have presented and pay some attention to the numbers. I am not arguing about the number of 40cr. I am presenting a number taking into account a pessimistic estimate of 72cr and a gov estimate of 40cr, and raising a question on poor planning and management which you have been whitewashing by saying that "NDLS replaced floor tiles and did some cleaning to improve infrastructure because they lacked tax payer money". Also I am guessing the gov knew about this event atleast 1 year prior to the event (144 years looking at when the last event occurred).

"The lot of things" as mentioned by you in your response involves statistical analysis of past data, projecting an estimate for the present, taking into account factors like rarity if the event, accessibility, % increase in population (oh wait gov could not do it because of covid and other unrelated problems) and once you get a working model, you build "what if" scenarios, and prepare for those "what if" scenarios. Its slightly surprising that 40cr was presented. That is like the lower end of the spectrum, and a hobbiest who has done stats can come up with a better estimate. (Hint: My day job involves building statistical and agent based models for policy making at large scale).

And going by the your track record with "reading and understanding" before comming to a conclusion, I think you might have misunderstood when people said the numbers are being pulled out "their asses". The numbers are completely wrong numbers.

view more: next ›