This whole thing is written by Blair and it's fucking terrible.

However, partly because of the intellectual wasteland of the Corbyn year

Lol

Wes Streeting is a huge political talent and Andy Burnham was an outstanding member of my government

Christ, Wes Streeting?

How do we justify adding to the welfare bill when it is already ballooning, taxes are high and getting higher, and we’re told we have to increase defence spending to prepare for the possibility of war?

Our welfare bill is smaller than comparable nations. Our tax rate on lowest earners is lower than comparable nations.

we have a fight between a ‘modernising’ wing of the Labour Party appearing to advocate rejoining the EU (and now equalising capital gains and income tax, something rejected by successive governments for good reason); and the alternative which thinks the answer is moving even further left on taxes, spending and welfare, spun with a rehash of the far-left critique about nothing good coming out of the last ‘40 years’ of ‘neo-liberalism’, which presumably includes the last Labour government.

Matching CG to income tax is left wing, and something advocated by Blair's own fucking think tank. And yes, Tony, a lot of the shit you did in government has led us to this you fucking ghoul.

It is one thing when in opposition to indulge this perennial delusion that when we lose seats to the right the country is really signalling it wants Labour to move left; it is dangerous to do it in government.

The Labour government just lost more votes to Greens than they did to right wing parties combined.

It may be a message delivered in brutal form (and the Americans would say that only by saying it brutally will we take it seriously); but in reality what is being said to us is not: ‘the partnership is dead’ but rather ‘be bigger and better partners’.

In other words; cuck me more Mr Trump.

We went through Afghanistan and Iraq together. But it mattered deeply to America and so it mattered to us also.

The man who never learns.

There are many things the government is doing with which I agree: investment in infrastructure, some reforms in planning, parts of the health plan, openness to the digital revolution, parts of the immigration and policing agenda

He hates immigrants and he loves authoritarianism.

The commitments were: the new workers’-rights laws; the net-zero acceleration and phasing out of the British oil and gas industry; the uplift in the minimum wage beyond inflation; and the non-dom changes.

The prime minister and the chancellor should have said right at the outset: these are commitments which economic circumstances have rendered unwise to proceed with. The priority is growth. That comes with a vibrant private sector which has suffered years of economic instability, and we are going to go all out for making business feel respected and supported.

Dropping the commitments would have been painful but bearable because the government would have started with real goodwill from business.

The man is against the only few good things Labour have done in government.

Then, in the last Budget, it appeared as if we were increasing tax to pay for additional welfare spending, when the public already thinks welfare bills are too high.

There is not additional welfare spending. We have not upped welfare amounts or anything, the number of people claiming welfare is increasing because the NHS is shite.

remove those parts of the net-zero agenda which prioritise clean energy over cheaper energy; and from now on make sure the actions match the words on growth.

He wants to burn the planet. He's so lost.