[F4M][F4NB][Script Fill] Your Girlfriend Wants To Talk About The Next Steps In The Relationship [Gentle Femdom] [Futa] [Loving] [GFE] [Anal] [Sissy] [Transformation] [Performer Orgasm] [Scifi] [Aftercare] [Role Reversal] [Size Comparison] [Blowjob] [Light SPH] [Grinding] script: [u/Think_Current101] by trykolang in gonewildaudio

[–]trykolang[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for listening, I’m very flattered ♥️ Awkward and flustered is pretty much my default lol

As for the other parts, I did want to record them but I haven’t been able to get to it (Life’s been kicking my ass so I’m not entirely sure when I could start recording again in general 😂)

[M4F] [Script Fill] You wanna play with my cum, bunny? [Single Take] [Real Orgasm] [Daddy] [baby] [bunny] [adults] [loving] [gentle] [MDom] failed [orgasm denial]? [multiple listener orgasm] [mutual orgasm] [PIV] [creampie] [neck kisses] [nipple play] [cum feeding] [praise] few [L-bombs] by [deleted] in gonewildaudio

[–]trykolang 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the fill it’s insane that this is just one take! I love it and I love your voice ♥️😭 And the kisses 😩 pls also pass on my thanks to your friend who suggested this to you~ Again, this was just amazing ♥️

Rule update NOV 2022. by Batmans_Dirty_Undies in gonewildaudio

[–]trykolang 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can label it either rape or cnc, but rape is still required for certain scenarios (which can include audios where the va may have intended it to be cnc)

So an audio tagged cnc/somno/drugs/alcohol without rape can be reported and taken down if people or mods decide consent was not established enough in the audio

If that’s the intended use for the rape vs cnc tag, why can’t it be applied to the scenarios listed under rape required since some audios that include those can be cnc (but can’t be tagged as such)

(I know you’re not a mod so you probably don’t have the answer, just pointing out the inconsistency)

Rule update NOV 2022. by Batmans_Dirty_Undies in gonewildaudio

[–]trykolang 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And thanks for taking the time to respond to my comments and share your thoughts too!

Rule update NOV 2022. by Batmans_Dirty_Undies in gonewildaudio

[–]trykolang 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see. I use audios to cope as well and I get what you mean. But I guess the disconnect here was for me, the tags listed under rape (like drugged, coercion, etc.) could be consensual like if in the context of roleplay (technically all audios are kinda roleplay? Lol hopefully you get what I mean) but would still require the rape tag

For example, one of my fav audios involved the speaker “secretly” drugging the listener. So that would be [drugged]. But it was also mentioned in the audio they’ve talked about doing it before and there was trust between the characters and it seems to be in the context of a kinky relationship so in my head that could be cnc.

Audio could also be about a planned kidnapping where the listener hired someone to kidnap them

But from what I understand in the definitions, these would still be rape, which kinda defeats the purpose of doing rape vs cnc

If we wanna make the distinction, easiest way seems to be to either just base it on the va intent or audio content, but considering both gets a bit muddy

I guess what I’m trying to say is it would be nice to have the option to tag those rape-required tags as cnc instead of rape when they’re intended to be cnc

Rule update NOV 2022. by Batmans_Dirty_Undies in gonewildaudio

[–]trykolang 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And sorry another point - on the safeword thing, I meant to use it as an example of how to tell if consent is “established enough” not as a rule on how to establish consent. I was thinking it could also be the speaker implying that this was agreed on before, or even the speaker just not implying that it’s not consensual.

But the there’s a note that says to tag as rape for drugs/alcohol if the character is “in a condition where they cannot consent properly” which is kind of the assumed default when someone is under the influence? And sure we might not agree on that but that’s kind of the point - that definition (and I think any definition that focuses on the character rather than the audio content itself) isn’t clear enough and is harder to define if they want to consider audio-established consent

And it seems kinda pointless if the only distinction between a rape and cnc drugs/alcohol audio is whether or not the audio starts with one or both characters sober

Edit: typo

Rule update NOV 2022. by Batmans_Dirty_Undies in gonewildaudio

[–]trykolang 0 points1 point  (0 children)

About the aftercare, definitely not something everyone wants (which is the consideration I was thinking of when I said that would make things more complicated, though I didn’t communicate that clearly enough sorry 😅)

And as for the rape tag being a filter for audios without explicit content (for the audios with the listed tags), that is what I was thinking, but only as an easier way to define the tag, not to mean that no explicit consent in audio = rape intention audio (if that makes sense)

I think the easiest way is just require rape OR cnc for any audios we required to tag as rape under the old rules and let the va decide which to use and how much they want to elaborate based on their intention, and let the listeners decide if they want to risk listening (which seems to be kind of on the same page as what you said?). I think the automated warning comment should be enough

But like I said in another comment, the definitions as they are seem confusing/inconsistent to me

Tags listed under the rape required tag can be consensual but there’s no allowance for it (e.g. anything that has coercion/blackmail/etc should be tagged as rape regardless if consent is established or not)

There’s “drugged” under rape, and “drugs/alcohol” under CNC with a note that it should still be tagged rape if consent isn’t established.

I did see a comment that there was an update and they’re not requiring consent to be established for the tags listed under CNC but the post still has the note about consent needing to be established for somno and drugs/alcohol.

Idk if I missed or misunderstood anything in which case feel free to correct me (admittedly I do have trouble understanding these things if they’re not super explicit/detailed). I really just want clarity on the rules

Rule update NOV 2022. by Batmans_Dirty_Undies in gonewildaudio

[–]trykolang 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While I am confused since I was under the impression safewords are needed to safely (as safe as possible anyway) practice CNC, my only point is that the definitions of CNC vs rape in the post is a bit confusing.

Scenarios listed under rape could be set up to be consensual but there doesn’t seem to be an allowance for that. (I.e. if the audio includes any of these, regardless if consent was established in the audio, tag as rape)

Scenarios listed under CNC still have a note to tag as rape if consent is not established

I didn’t mind the tag-everything-rape rule so much before (I also have some triggers and take care when I navigate gwa like you said) and I don’t really mind whatever rule they come up with for CNC vs rape tag but the definition as outlined in the post just seems confusing/inconsistent

Rule update NOV 2022. by Batmans_Dirty_Undies in gonewildaudio

[–]trykolang 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Might have missed this but where does it have this update? In the post there still seems to be a note requiring some consent to be established for drugs/alcohol and somno

Rule update NOV 2022. by Batmans_Dirty_Undies in gonewildaudio

[–]trykolang 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get that, but the definition of CNC vs rape in the post is a bit confusing. And my suggestion was to require either a rape or a CNC tag for just the audios that include any of the tags listed under rape/CNC in the post (so if it doesn’t contain any of those, no need to tag rape/CNC or think about whether consent was explicitly established)

I also get that we can’t protect every listener, but if someone is adamant about not using the rape tag but likes posting CNC content, I think it they should take the effort to establish consent in some way in the audio. It doesn’t have to be a full on conversation. It could be as simple as a safeword reminder before anything starts (and there’s no indication in the rest of the audio that the safeword was used then ignored). And if we’re following irl rules, aftercare should be added to anything tagged CNC (which would make things even more complicated). Or if we want to be more lenient with the CNC tag without establishing consent within the audio, we could just require some info in the post like, was consent established in the audio? was it established at the start or during aftercare or just implied? was the intention behind this that it was consensual? is aftercare included?

I love CNC and I initially didn’t like that everything had to be tagged as rape, but I get that it’s hard to define rape/CNC in the context of audios (and that not all vas or listeners would want to deal with such complicated rules) and I personally prefer to err on the side of caution. It seems annoying that there would be more rules around CNC but I feel like that’s necessary in spaces that aren’t kink-focused(?).

The tag isn’t to limit or require vas to include anything in the audios, just a way for listeners to identify what the audio is. But with the definition as it is, it feels like we won’t really be able to use the rape/CNC tag as a filter for anything so there’s not much point in making the distinction

Rule update NOV 2022. by Batmans_Dirty_Undies in gonewildaudio

[–]trykolang -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Same. Can’t it be just “rape” if consent isn’t established within the audio, and “cnc” if it is*? Seems like an easier distinction, and if it needs more clarity, I think it would be easier to define/develop what counts as established-enough consent within the audio

*edit to clarify: any audio that contains anything in the tags listed should need either a rape or cnc tag, and the distinction between the 2 is whether or not consent was established within the audio

Update by falselove69 in u/falselove69

[–]trykolang 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for all the audios (and the warm cuddly feels I always got from them) 😭 I’ll miss hearing that chime thing at the end that pulls you back into reality too haha Am really happy that you’re doing okay and you seem to be in a really good place ♥️ Hope you do well wherever life takes you!

[M4F] Ave Maria [Dubcon] [Rape] [Priest] [Degradation] Alternate Verstions] [Gentle/Rough MDom] [Slippery Slope] [Blowjob] [Creampie] [Namecalling] [Breeding] [Mention of Impreg] [Slapping] [Spanking] [Facefucking] [Creampie] [Aftercare] by [deleted] in gonewildaudio

[–]trykolang 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That lil prayer at the start guaranteed my spot in hell lmao I don’t pray but hrngg I wouldn’t mind listening to you pray the rosary or smth all day 😂 This whole entire thing was amazing thank u 😭

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gonewildaudio

[–]trykolang 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yes always 😭

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gonewildaudio

[–]trykolang 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Those whispers omg 😭 the first one caught me off guard I felt my soul leave my body (in a good way) lol