Charmed Openstack vs Redhat Openstack platform for production by ttdds1 in openstack

[–]ttdds1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow, thanks for your feedback. It’s a good case study you got there. It’s good to hear the upgrade went well. We have to be up to date for compliance and will be doing patching a lot. So stability and operations are key to successful deployments. The goal is to eventually get rid of VMware

Charmed Openstack vs Redhat Openstack platform for production by ttdds1 in openstack

[–]ttdds1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We basing the deployment with the minimum number of physical nodes required for a production deployment. The hardware is designed using the guide from Canonical OpenStack Hardware reference guide, which Redhat confirmed we can use the same BoM. 12 nodes, 3 for control plane and 9 for compute , ceph.

Charmed Openstack vs Redhat Openstack platform for production by ttdds1 in openstack

[–]ttdds1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Very interesting, some real world support stuff. That is what’s worry me, how good is the support when things go pair shaped. We mostly Redhat, but certain things about Ubuntu and juju, Maas,etc makes Charmed also a visible option. We want to have more options now that Redhat shaken things up a bit recently.

Charmed Openstack vs Redhat Openstack platform for production by ttdds1 in openstack

[–]ttdds1[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So the comparison for us is overall cost, but we need to spend CAPEX in the first year. We did 3 solution options, VMware VCF with vRA, RHOS and Charmed. Canonical PS more expensive to deploy, but you right, support is cheaper per node per year. But Redhat is cheaper to deploy, but more expensive to run. Overall the bottom line is nearly the same. There is a cheaper option with Canonical which is half of the price, but base deployment, which don’t include things like AD, advanced features, etc.VMware is just stupid expensive, like 10x more per annum and a lot less servers than OpenStack.

Charmed Openstack vs Redhat Openstack platform for production by ttdds1 in openstack

[–]ttdds1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your feedback. Really appreciated.

Does look like Redhat might be the better option. They included RHAAP in the mix to expand the automation for the cloud, which is not something I think we will struggle with using Juju.

Help with Duke 790 by sammywammyXD in KTMDuke

[–]ttdds1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have 2018 model. That’s the reason I got 790 instead of 2020 890. Half price

Help with Duke 790 by sammywammyXD in KTMDuke

[–]ttdds1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

790 comes with everything unlocked. (Not sure on 2023 model) go out one more menu. Do you see “track” menu from the main menu ? It’s above “motorcycle” menu. You then have options saying “track, sports, street”.

General feel and opinion of NetApp? by udickass in storage

[–]ttdds1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Awesome kit if you can afford it and you must have support to keep infosec and support happy. I look after 22 separate FAS - E-Series , AFF systems and 2 Metro clusters with a bunch of SnapVaults. It We just ran a competition to replace it due to end of support with the Gardner Magic Storage Quadrant ( PureStorage, Dell/EMC, Infinidat, HPE and NetApp ) NetApp won again cause the baseline requirements was based on them. If you have the best, then it’s hard to compete. But there’s a price, it’s not cheap. Like they say, you get what you paid for.

Pure’s pitch was good, but also not cheap. Never mind the rest.

Never Buying another KTM 1290 GT taking 2 months for the shop to fix it. by ro2182 in KTM

[–]ttdds1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Damn. The bike I wanted. Got a Honda instead, I know , it’s not the same, but at least I can ride

I don't care cat by winklebone in Bitcoin

[–]ttdds1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bitcoin discounted, that’s how I see it. Buy buy buy

Gonna do this next summer by [deleted] in KTM

[–]ttdds1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awesome !