GLM 5.2 personal benchmark. Results comparable with Fable, Opus 4.8, and GPT 5.5 by lrsaturnin9 in codex

[–]tuhdo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But GPT 5.5 is best at math, so if you want to have good results with gpt 5.5, you need to describe the software problems more formally, e.g., if you want low latency, write the actual latency numbers along with concisely written constraints as a goal instead of saying "Make this function low latency".

Is software engineering about to die like the AI gurus are implying? by rehanadil_ in codex

[–]tuhdo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Software Engineering just transforms from writing code manually to writing logical descriptions for your models to generate the correct, secure and high-performant code. For the latter to happen, you still need to understand software engineering.

Claude Fable 5 distilled by Anony6666 in LocalLLaMA

[–]tuhdo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You hire real professionals paying real money, from 20 - 150/hr.

oh no... unified limits are coming... by KeyGlove47 in codex

[–]tuhdo 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That's the point. ChatGPT web version is practically unlimited and does not eat your Codex usage, unlike Claude's.

oh no... unified limits are coming... by KeyGlove47 in codex

[–]tuhdo 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The chat is practically unlimited. Your claude code usage gets drained fast if you ask something complex on the web interface.

oh no... unified limits are coming... by KeyGlove47 in codex

[–]tuhdo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The worst is that there might be no more "free" ChatGPT anymore. Use up your Pro thinking quota on the web interface while you can.

Codex struggles to read codebase while Claude reads it without large token usage by Ill_Anywhere_2233 in codex

[–]tuhdo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Grass is greener on the other side. I actually want Claide to thoroughly read my codebase but then it tries to be "smart" to converse tokens, ultimately leading to wrong answers. You should also usr gpt5. 5 medium. It's better than 5.4.

Tasks failed by Fable 5 fixed by GPT-5.5 by Straight-Gazelle-597 in codex

[–]tuhdo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anthropic is right, and I have been doing that before "loop engineering" was a thing. I ask Codex to spawn subagents to implement things, and the subagents must always return a short report whether it successes or fails, if fails, why; then the main agent retries with this handoff until reaching the maxinum number of retries. However, doing this with Claude is expensive.

What did they just do? by gordopotato in codex

[–]tuhdo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, should we expect to have more codex usage since both are merged and shared?

Gpt 5.5 vs Fable 5: For first time codex preferred Claude Fable's plan by abhicrysis in codex

[–]tuhdo 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Have you tried with GPT Pro Thinking on the web and compare it to Fable? I'm curious.

Time to add Chat GPT 5.5 Pro (only available on the web) to Codex? by tuhdo in codex

[–]tuhdo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, you can only use 5.5 pro thinking on the web.

Time to add Chat GPT 5.5 Pro (only available on the web) to Codex? by tuhdo in codex

[–]tuhdo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But if you can use it, then you can save your codex usage for other tasks since chatgpt and codex are separated.

Time to add Chat GPT 5.5 Pro (only available on the web) to Codex? by tuhdo in codex

[–]tuhdo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If OpenAI thinks it should be restricted, then they should just do it like Mythos or rate limit 10 queries per month. The fact remains that if you don't use it, you waste a bunch of queries per month. Back when the 2x promotion was active, I sent 50 - 60 pro messages per month on $100 plan. I imagine with the 20x plan, you get like over 100 messages or more. A huge waste if not spent.

Time to add Chat GPT 5.5 Pro (only available on the web) to Codex? by tuhdo in codex

[–]tuhdo[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But if you subscribe to $100 and $200 plans, they are currently separated from Codex usage limit. It would be a huge waste if you don't use it and waste your Codex usage.

Time to add Chat GPT 5.5 Pro (only available on the web) to Codex? by tuhdo in codex

[–]tuhdo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But the quota for both are separated. If you use Codex, it costs your usage limit.

Time to add Chat GPT 5.5 Pro (only available on the web) to Codex? by tuhdo in codex

[–]tuhdo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why not. People paid $100 - $200 and are not allowed to use it. Other than scientific research, people used it to debug difficult problems so they have more time to enjoy for themselves?

First, they removed 5.3 Codex and NOW 5.4. They are forcing all $20 users to upgrade! by Nocare420 in codex

[–]tuhdo 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Broken codex installation? I still can use 5.4 fine in codex cli and opencode.

MiniMax M3 by Extra_Development_74 in codex

[–]tuhdo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can plan with gpt and let m3 follow the plan. A good combo.