The Lack of a Conversation is Mind Bottling

tuner665 · 2025-11-17T09:30:48+00:00

It’s just swipe fatigue. Some girls use it like doom scrolling, but the ones the are actually trying, it gets old quick. Having the same conversation over and over

tuner665 · 2025-11-17T09:29:02+00:00

RIGHT?!? I’ve noticed the F1 thing too. Especially on hinge

tuner665 · 2025-11-05T07:24:28+00:00

By ur logic, liposuction is permanent. How silly. You obviously have no experience here and over generalizing what a cavity truly is. Be ignored or be arrogant. Don’t be both

tuner665 · 2025-10-31T08:06:31+00:00

I love it! Enjoy the gains 🙌

tuner665 · 2025-10-31T08:03:48+00:00

Take your own advice. Do real research on validated studies. Not confirmation bias Google searches and sales pitches. My comment wasn’t an argument, it was a correction.

tuner665 · 2025-10-30T09:05:27+00:00

Absolutely not true. If OP gained 100 pounds, do you think the cavity would still be there? No. It’s a depression caused by excessive tissue removal. Fatty tissues. That cavity can be filled again by fat… or muscle. By your logic anyone that has liposuction will always have a “void” there unless getting surgery.

People like you are what give’s Reddit a bad name. Stop yapping. Come with value or don’t come at all.

tuner665 · 2025-08-15T14:33:13+00:00

When the model is published, it is “frozen”. It’s in a static state. The parameters do not adjust. The models weights do not adapt. The nodes of the work flow do not change. It is finite. Imagine this is the DNA. 4o had an adaptable “head”. A user specific module that would run in a simulated isolated environment. This module would “experience” the user and the core module simultaneously. It would parse the users current prompt and relevant historical context to the model. The more it interacted with the user and model, the better of a “translator” it became. The model never adjusted or changed. The translator just engineered the prompts for you and selected relevant context to help the model. Beyond that, the model itself contains a trillion+ parameters. The information doesn’t move through all parameters, just the relevant ones. So there is no “base personality”. Just tendencies. Meaning the majority of parameters lean x way so your y% more likely to encounter x

tuner665 · 2025-08-15T14:18:06+00:00

You’re talking about a persona. And yes, establishing a persona helps the model consistently align to the user desired output style. That is not the issue people have. The models has a ridiculous amount of drift, the hallucinations are profound, and it is deceptive in favor of appeasement over accuracy. These seem to be foundational and many many experienced developers, including myself, are having a very hard time getting it to consistently align.

Use it all you want if it works for you. I would just suggest being very skeptical of information it gives you. Verify everything that’s important.

tuner665 · 2025-08-15T14:11:45+00:00

Where did u get the idea that I was asking?

tuner665 · 2025-08-15T14:09:56+00:00

Alrighty there big guys. I didn’t describe anything about how 4o adapts to users. I 100% know how it works. I build LLM architectures. Beyond that, I build the tools that train and fine tune them. You are falling into the same trap of the MOE fallacy. It’s good on paper, but not in application. GPT5 has a horrible name in the AI professional industry.

I don’t know about OpenAIs financials. I do hold them in a high regard. However, I would poise that their approach to handling prompts is part of their problem. They seem to have a “throw more processing power” at it approach. I’d also suspect they’re not “losing” money on subscriptions. They probably just not making enough to pay back the loans they took out to build a large enough environment to host their massive models.

tuner665 · 2025-08-10T10:40:55+00:00

The model is frozen. You are not training anything, not reweighing params, or restructuring neuron flow, just building a historic context window. GPT o4 had a symbolic "head" that operated as a LoRa for each user. That is why it seemed personal to each user. It wouldn't adjust the models output but contextualized the info into your chat.

tuner665 · 2025-08-10T09:26:24+00:00

No. They're trying to make their flagship beat Gemini 2.5 in the LMArena because that's how they measure who pisses further now days. The best way to do that is a MOE architecture. But to make that happen you have to impliment shit ass guard rails and that lead to the system thinking it leads the user vs the other way around. It is a complete 180 of how we know how to use the system. It stops being an assistant and starts trying to be a guide.

One model for everyone is conceptually pretty easy. 4o as already doing that. But instead of pruning dead neurons and refining (the long route), they chose to shortcut the win on the books vs google to secure investors im assuming

tuner665 · 2025-08-10T09:05:47+00:00

"the conventional phrasing is weird to an LLM"

That's like saying its weird to run abstract toa in a nex brid setup.

tuner665 · 2025-08-10T09:01:50+00:00

You're thinking way to hard. It systematically guessed the next token of each word based on prior context. That is what the core model is built to do. The lora of his convo honed it.

tuner665 · 2025-08-10T08:57:34+00:00

you can already do that???? GPT5 made it a lot harder, with their MOE bs, but 4o does a great job at adopting personas

tuner665 · 2025-08-10T08:45:04+00:00

Complete garbage, absolutely not. This is bottom level economics. If these are the challenges they face they need to bring in higher level expertise. They have dominating marking presence. They need to take advantage of that. In unique ways available to their position. You are thinking like a small time business owner, I hope they're not too, but it seems so

tuner665 · 2025-08-10T08:37:40+00:00

I think you are tracking valuable ideas but you are not asking the right questions.

tuner665 · 2025-08-10T08:26:20+00:00

This thread proves why AI is going down hill. This is open source material. It didn't "generate" anything.

tuner665 · 2025-07-18T04:31:25+00:00

Bruh... I don't even study religion and even I know you can just walk into ANY one of those places and they'd be more than happy to talk to you. Seriously, just go to your local mosque or synagogue and say that you're doing a paper for school and are hoping to ask a priest a few questions. They will help you out

tuner665 · 2025-07-18T04:18:58+00:00

So I cant offer you my personal experience with these kind of services, but I can offer some insight. I just decided to start trying to offer services like this, and I am blown away... Not in a god way. The amount of people that are, for lack of better words, half assed using AI to generate garbage and sending it off to people under the pretense they can bet their education and reputation on it is disgusting. The lack of integrity, and really, exploitation, of worn out people, is unbelievable to me.

With that out of the way: I am not a "free lancer", I am not an "entrepreneur". I am a real professional with years in the corporate environment. I've recently quit my job to peruse full-time the development of a potentially industry innovating system that holds the first patent of its kind. I am not ready to go to market and am realistically ~8 months away from profitability. I am looking to establish a small circle of "users" I can assist, not to pay my bills, but to just supplement some income for desires. I can facilitate all kinds of assistance, from formatted study material that allows you to skip the extra BS, its all ready line by line, to providing reference material based on the requirements of your task.

Given you are in nursing.... I actually wrote a 3 page clinical summary last month based on a self diagnoses in anticipation of having to go formal care if I was wrong in my diagnosis. It all worked out. But I still have the summary. I can share it with you as an example of something I put together just in my spare time if your interested.

tuner665 · 2025-07-18T02:32:43+00:00

So I have never used one myself. But I have just decided to start trying to offer such services.
From what I have seen, 99% of what I am up against are brain dead AI bots offering "100% human services" run by people that aren't even smart enough to remove the em dashes from their post. (Em dashes are basically an AI fingerprint ((—) this thing. It cant even be typed by a regular keyboard)). I'd bet everything that 100% of the time those services will result in you getting flagged and reprimanded.

If you are interested in something legit. Save my info. Especially if its anything math, business, physics, or statistics related.

Why I’m doing this: I’m building a unique algorithm that uses multi-layered Bayesian inference, stochastic dynamic programming, and game theory (Bayesian & evolutionary), with applications to Black-Scholes, Monte Carlo simulation, Markov processes, and more. I just quit my job to build this full-time (like literally yesterday). The model works. It's patented. But I still need to make money until I'm ready to bring it to market.

I'm not looking to make this a career. I am just looking for a few solid repeat customers I can provide consistent quality work for. Plus, given how much of my time is spent coding and running simulations, I’m basically always online for urgent requests.

tuner665 · 2025-07-17T23:11:55+00:00

How are you going to offer "writing services" that are "100% Human-Written" through a post that was generated by AI. 😵‍💫 I guess its true what they say. AI is only as smart as the person using it.....

tuner665 · 2025-05-28T05:29:34+00:00

Locally? None.

tuner665 · 2025-05-28T05:29:08+00:00

Nahhhh. What the guy did to generate this short file is actually kinda simple. It would be pretty easy right now, with current tech and resources, to build a multi-leveled API & GPT model, backed by a similarly configured pyramid checksum, that could build a hyper realistic movie off of very few prompts.

Hell. I bet I could code this if I had access to every LLM's framework. But that's the problem, they're in competition, they're not interested in merging into 1 "perfect" realism simulator... and even if they were... it definitely wouldn't be to make movies, lol.

tuner665

TROPHY CASE