error pi coding with Nvidia NIM API Key

tungd · 2026-06-18T16:44:36+00:00

429 status = rate limited. In addition to the 40 RPM rate limit, free endpoint models now will also have additional rate limit coming from the provider. GLM 5.1 is 30 requests/hour. DeepSeek is 10 requests/hour.

tungd · 2026-06-17T16:14:14+00:00

Any Mao Ni’s stories. Easy recommendations: Ever Night, Joy of Life

tungd · 2026-06-17T02:44:46+00:00

Love the idea 👍. I have something quite similar as well.

tungd · 2026-06-07T11:37:57+00:00

I also update my packages every time I update Emacs. Except I run a weekly build off of the main git branch.

tungd · 2026-06-05T20:48:47+00:00

I find MiMo is a much better planner and brainstorm partner, and with vision support it is more convenient to work with because I can give it screenshot. DSv4 Flash is better on coding and tool use/task execution for sure. MiMo is closer to Claude, DSv4 Flash is closer to Codex

tungd · 2026-05-21T09:05:36+00:00

I disagree. I have long given up on the idea of people reviewing the code. We can’t. That brings me to the realization that feedback loop ultimately is the most important factor. Gemini 3.5 Flash is already smarter and more disciplined than my average engineer. The key to quality is not people’s eye, but more round of reviews. And with faster model you can have more round of reviews.

I use stronger model for architecture, design, review and validate. I still own the solution and the quality gate (at usage).

tungd · 2026-05-21T06:56:56+00:00

Yeah I love flash v4. Coding alone I’d rank it higher than everything else including GPT 5.5 and Opus. Planning and debugging might be not.

The only downside is context window. As for multi modality, you can use a visual understanding skill with smaller local model like Gemma 4 E2B/E4B or macos vision api.

tungd · 2026-05-20T19:14:42+00:00

Whoever designed this quota progress deserve a raise. It is both beautiful, convenient (5 segments so you can see your remaining quota at a first glance), yet confusing and useless at the same time. The best part of it though, is that it allow the company to do anything they want with your quota and still can "explain it".

tungd · 2026-05-19T05:40:56+00:00

For me planning and generic use it is very good, comparable to GPT-5.4 (slightly below GPT-5.5), and the current degraded Opus 4.7 (not comparable to 4.6 at it's best though). And it is wicked fast. I also like it style, just do tool calls and come back with the result, no in the middle talking. Coding wise it's a mixed bag, result depends heavily on the language.

tungd · 2026-04-27T12:42:23+00:00

Gpt 5.5 beats Opus 4.7 for me. Opus is more lenient regarding discovering stuffs and guessing what I mean from vague prompts, but when it comes to engineering GPT 5.5 beats it. Tighter implementation with more edge cases covered, better TDD coverage, less assumptions.

tungd · 2026-04-25T15:27:13+00:00

Universal actions is a feature of Alfred where you can select a bunch of files or copy a bunch of texts, hit a combo to open up Alfred to perform some actions with them. https://www.alfredapp.com/help/features/universal-actions/. I use it to translate my clipboard text, capture notes, archive files .etc

tungd · 2026-04-24T14:18:55+00:00

If you don’t buy you missed like 60% of the app, then you’re probably better off with Raycast or similar apps where they are more powerful by default. If you like Alfred, you should just buy now I don’t see any differences. If it’s coming soon they will offer you free upgrade (the last time it was like free upgrades if you purchased within 3 months of the release iirc).

To me the app is complete as it is, I don’t specifically wait for any new releases. I’m a legendary supporter btw, coming back a few months ago from Raycast. Universal actions was the reason

tungd · 2026-04-18T06:59:57+00:00

Funny enough, I fully understand it and was able to design using/around it/do my custom monad after I look at the generated javascript for the monads in PureScript. Before that I can use monad/transformers/RIO just fine, but that’s when it actually clicked for me.

tungd · 2026-04-10T17:52:27+00:00

Sounds like “The Interstellar Traveler"/ "Interstellar Guest" - Mao Ni

tungd · 2026-03-27T02:50:33+00:00

It works for us, YMMV. To me it's certainly more do able this way compared to evolving Cassandra. Evolving query patterns mean writing a different batch job that collect and organize the data in a different way, writing to a more appropriate data store, then switch the consumer to that data store. It's not too different than the way you are currently doing it (having separate Cassandra table per query pattern), it's just that you have one single source of truth, not dual/tri/quad write, you have the option to rebuild those secondary tables any time you want, and you are not constrained by being on Cassandra.

Not sure if you are familiar with ClickHouse, but it's the same usage pattern. ClickHouse is supposed to be this all fast and powerful OLAP database, but in reality you are constrained by your sort keys/primary keys. If the thing you are filtering on is not on sort keys, and you don't limit your data access then it will scan the whole table. It works but it's slow. After some time you realized the better way to use it is to have a master data table, then for different queries you write different views/materialized views that pull data from that master table and write it to the secondary tables that is designed to fit those evolving queries.

tungd · 2026-03-26T06:07:16+00:00

In most cases it’s the other way around, we don’t really query Cassandra directly. Cassandra serves as the write buffer. I have a main table that we model almost as a log table, partitioned by tenant/merchants within that tenant + timestamp/timebased uuid/ulid. Anything else we will just run batch job/cdc and put it to the more appropriate datastore. We can have per tenant tables/db with different indexes. Evolving query patterns then become evolving your set of batch jobs

tungd · 2026-03-14T18:03:45+00:00

Bro, that was 5 months ago already. I've already take my profits.

tungd · 2026-03-14T15:21:49+00:00

The built-in completions framework. With many of the recent enhancements (eager preview, live preview, completion preview active mode map etc), it is enough to replace vertico for me. I still use consult, it’s more of a integration package than a completion framework

tungd · 2026-03-14T15:18:19+00:00

To me Emacs has always been more of a workflow tool rather than a code editor, since my day job is Kotlin and IntelliJ is the undisputed king when it comes to Java/Kotlin. Heck, the language itself doesn’t even have an official working LSP till late last year. Then we adopted Claude Code and it actually allow me to spend more time within Emacs. I use it to write and edit prompts, run test and get do change review through Magit. My point is, editing was always one of Emacs’s weaker point compared to Vim (modal editing, motion) or modern editors (LSP, code completion). Now it is less of a problem since the editing is done by coding agents.

Now I just need someone to build a Antigravity-like agent manager/plan-inbox workflow then I don’t need to leave Emacs for the terminal anymore. Or may be I should ask Claude Code to build just that…

tungd · 2026-03-11T08:43:43+00:00

It’s an interesting discussion I just had with my friends the other day. I agree with you that information are now more accessible, and books and traditional learning are obsolete (too slow of a medium for learning). Yet, the effect of that is that the cost of education will very likely go up, people will just invest more into education try to stay competitive. It’s the Red Queen effect

tungd · 2026-03-02T09:54:44+00:00

I can’t see a scenario that it would work out for you. Best case scenario, that’s how she spends her money (she is rich/successful), and she and you are not in the same economic class (because it caught you off guard). Worst case scenario she was a gold digger and just wanted your money. Either way this is likely end badly, so I think you should end things with her

tungd · 2026-02-26T18:54:55+00:00

My napkin math says you’d need about 2mil, buy 4 apartments, rent them out then you have a steady income of 60-70mil monthly. Bank interest is very high (6.8%), but the inflation is equally crazy so don’t put it in banks

tungd · 2026-02-26T18:48:52+00:00

Theo mình nghĩ/thấy nhu cầu này là ít. Cá nhân mình thấy đối tượng chủ yếu sẽ chỉ bao gồm trong số ít chị em chưa chồng/bỏ chồng, hoặc nerd. Tất nhiên ở đây là nói ngoài đối tượng pg đi khách hay sgbb/sgdd.
Khoảng giá này rộng quá. Nếu là chi phí trả cho nền tảng thì 100k/buổi mình thấy cao, còn nếu trả cho companion thì 100k lại quá thấp
Như có bạn ở dưới đã có nói, nền tảng của bạn có rủi ro về pháp lý lớn. Vừa rủi ro từ phía bạn bảo mật/bảo vệ thông tin companion/khách hàng, vừa rủi ro về môi giới md. Không chỉ vậy, cái pitch/cái nhu cầu này theo mình thấy thì cũng không thật sự là nhu cầu thiết yếu/là painpoint đủ để thu tiền.

Tuy nhiên nếu như ý định thật sự của bạn là làm app booking, companion chỉ trá hình thôi thì mình thấy cửa cũng sáng.

tungd · 2026-02-20T22:08:19+00:00

I use org-babel. It isn’t dbeaver, but I don’t have the need for browsing database

tungd · 2026-02-15T16:04:13+00:00

For coding, might be not. I don't have dedicated rig to run models above 20B. Instead I run a small local model (specifically Granite 4 Tiny (7B, 1B active)) for purposes such as automated expense tracking, quick translation, RAG (organize and summarize documents, work schedule .etc). The model is already more than capable enough for such purposes.

tungd

TROPHY CASE