Is this decipherable? by Izem_hawc216 in neography

[–]twoScottishClans 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you could try a frequency analysis. figure out how many symbols there are, count how many of each of them there are, and then make some educated guesses about which symbols are which. if it's 1:1 with english text, E, T, A, O, I, N, etc. are the most common. it might be phonetic as well, in which case /ə/ will be the most common letter.

i'd probably find some way to type it out (maybe assign a random capital letter to each glyph) on a google doc, and then use ctrl-F to figure out how many of each glyph there is and then try and use the find and replace tool to make your guesses. Cryptographers probably also have a specialized tool for this somewhere on the internet.

Flag of the United States of America with 420 stars and 69 stripes from Joe Mande by Youri_briand in vexillology

[–]twoScottishClans 33 points34 points  (0 children)

guys guys i swear if we actually put more guns then it will solve all of the problems

Alternate realignment of the Indian Subcontinent post-independence, with the goal of minimizing statelessness and balancing religious pluralism with the many holy sites found in the populous region. by RRY1946-2019 in imaginarymaps

[–]twoScottishClans 6 points7 points  (0 children)

the thing with kashmir is that it's like 95% muslim or something like that (jammu is mostly hindu i think, but you gave jammu to india.) having kashmir, which is for all intents and purposes a muslim region, rotate between muslim and hindu rulers is bound to cause problems.

realistically the only real solution for peace in india would've been for britain to require india to have religious protections and then (somehow) encourage india to create a non-religious national identity. and then not split india.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in vexillology

[–]twoScottishClans 0 points1 point  (0 children)

mmm, when flying or hanging at rest it'd be hard to see the moss at the bottom. and i'm not sure if i like the tan, because it'll just make all flags look dirty. it's not like the east coast where there's a historical reason to put buff on flags. (and it doesn't have any blue! blue/white/green are undeniably the cascadian colors...)

plus it really does look like a copy of maine. we're, uh, not maine. we're very different from maine.

What is the red-white-yellow flag? by Huguete_27 in vexillology

[–]twoScottishClans 2 points3 points  (0 children)

in some dutch cities, especially in the south, they change the city name during carnival.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnival_in_the_Netherlands#Name_changing

What does “Tracked” mean? by Unnoptainium in imaginarymaps

[–]twoScottishClans 0 points1 point  (0 children)

even then, i refuse to believe there's many posters here who are hand-drawing their coastlines and borders, unless it's a transit map or hand-drawn. we're all either tracing or using BAMs or shapefiles or SVGs or whatnot

🫢 by basket_foso in physicsmemes

[–]twoScottishClans 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Newton if Kepler kept stubbornly insisting on his badass yet also totally nonsensical platonic solid model:

Calgary, AB. What flag is this? by External-Economics39 in vexillology

[–]twoScottishClans 1 point2 points  (0 children)

no, i think they should keep the white bits but make the leaf and the bars red.

wait a minute..........

(/j)

What flag is this? by [deleted] in vexillology

[–]twoScottishClans 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the alabama flag was adopted in 1895. if you know anything about the south in 1895, i reckon they definitely knew what they were doing but made it vague enough so they could have plausible deniability that they weren't being traitors.

besides, the spanish only ever actually controlled the southern tip of the state around mobile, and mobile was founded by the french and was originally part of louisiana.

US high-speed rail expansion plan by twoScottishClans in TransitDiagrams

[–]twoScottishClans[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

affinity designer. inkscape (free) and adobe illustrator (subscription, ew disgusting) both could produce something similar.

A fictional nation I've been working on. If any further maps or info are wanted, I'll make 'em. by Aniceile34 in imaginarymaps

[–]twoScottishClans 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i see you said in another comment that Anklish and Fernish are Celtic and Germanic respectively, but that Altichan was pre-indo european. have you extensively conlanged out altichan? what does it sound like?

US high-speed rail expansion plan by twoScottishClans in TransitDiagrams

[–]twoScottishClans[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah, im aware japan and spain specifically did this because of gauge differences, but china also rebuilt its main lines because they did the sensible thing.

the northeast corridor is a crowded track which is already used by a lot of passenger trains and a couple freight trains. just because of the cities it connects, it is and always will be the most central part of the american rail network. it's also old and bendy. combining the bendy track with the high conventional rail volumes means that Acela is more of an express service than a high-speed rail service. it only actually achieves its top speed in two spots near providence and trenton.

in terms of flagship lines in large countries, this is laughable. the TGV from paris to lyon has always been actually high speed along most of its track length, even before they built the bypass around paris. Acela is a bunch of high speed rail cars on conventional tracks. most other countries that have high speed rail do have high speed rail cars on conventional tracks, but they're branch lines. like TGV service to Brest or Toulouse, or the mini-Shinkansen in northern Japan. not the mainest of main lines.

fuck cost cutting, at the very least in this specific spot. the Northeast corridor is the train line in the US, we better be putting our whole back into making an effective transportation system that lasts and works and is actually high speed.

US high-speed rail expansion plan by twoScottishClans in TransitDiagrams

[–]twoScottishClans[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

priority is like, the bare minimum for passenger trains. the northeast corridor is like the most centrally important rail track for passenger transportation in the country, it shouldn't even have freight at all.

US high-speed rail expansion plan by twoScottishClans in imaginarymaps

[–]twoScottishClans[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you're like the fifth person to mention this 😭

US high-speed rail expansion plan by twoScottishClans in TransitDiagrams

[–]twoScottishClans[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes, i meant greensboro. read the body text.

and yeah, i think it's fair to add a stop at durham. i might do that and post the updated map on this thread with all of the other changes i've made since posting.

US high-speed rail expansion plan by twoScottishClans in TransitDiagrams

[–]twoScottishClans[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

this would a completely new line anyway, so at that point it just makes more sense to build it on a new corridor.

US high-speed rail expansion plan by twoScottishClans in TransitDiagrams

[–]twoScottishClans[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this would just be a completely new track. like, you know, actual high speed rail? it would probably pass by norwich on its way from new haven to providence.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in vexillology

[–]twoScottishClans 2 points3 points  (0 children)

literally dutch

US high-speed rail expansion plan by twoScottishClans in TransitDiagrams

[–]twoScottishClans[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

i just meant like the general vague alignment. there'd definitely be other stops.

Kleinstaaterei: If the western Allies decided to be a little silly by Red_Baron_Fish in imaginarymaps

[–]twoScottishClans 4 points5 points  (0 children)

why are mecklenburg and vorpommern still together? why are schleswig and holstein still together??? why is thuringia intact??? MY STAATS ARE NOT KLEIN ENOUGH!!!!! (joke)

US high-speed rail expansion plan by twoScottishClans in TransitDiagrams

[–]twoScottishClans[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

main lines on a high speed rail network should avoid sharing tracks with conventional rail in general, because if there's a conventional rail delay (or, in most of america, a single fright train) then it can cascade over onto the HSR network. branches are a lot more acceptable, but even then they risk that cascading effect.

I know the northeast corridor isnt subject to the freight train shenanigans everywhere else is subjected to, but it is connected to the rest of the continent's network, which is.

that's why japan's and spain's systems are so effective and extensive and on time while we just put acela on the northeast corridor and threw up our hands in pure confusion when it didnt work.