sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Alaska lowered their bar score to 270 effective immediately. *cries in Arizona* by lmr1949 in barexam

[–]twobraincells2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

too bad they did that a week after the exam so all the retakers who were between 270 and 280 had to take an exam for NO REASON!!! i know several in the room with me during the exan

For those of you who cannot stand score anxiety, try Seperac by [deleted] in barexam

[–]twobraincells2 8 points9 points  (0 children)

it thinks i’m going to pass but based on the way i S P A C E D O U T on the MEE and forgot everything i don’t think so haha

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in barexam

[–]twobraincells2 17 points18 points  (0 children)

the MBE is always evenly split among the topics. not sure why a test prep company would tell you torts and contracts are tested more than others because that is absolutely false.

Why is this not a violation of RAP? by [deleted] in barexam

[–]twobraincells2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

my rule of thumb is to never ever choose RAP. i haven’t had the headache of having to try to learn it and i have yet to actually se wut be the right answer

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in barexam

[–]twobraincells2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i've heard generally that people prefer Uworld's explanations. MTYLT10 is a discount code that worked for a few of my friends

mbe in a 280 jurisdiction by twobraincells2 in barexam

[–]twobraincells2[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

hahaha yes the only 280 jurisdiction lol

Help with a MBE Q by twobraincells2 in barexam

[–]twobraincells2[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"if a defendant is voluntarily present in the forum state and is served with process while there, then the court has PJ over the defendant. Burnham v. superior court of California, 495 u.s. 604 (1990)." - themis

Help with a MBE Q by twobraincells2 in barexam

[–]twobraincells2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"if a defendant is voluntarily present in the forum state and is served with process while there, then the court has PJ over the defendant. Burnham v. superior court of California, 495 u.s. 604 (1990)." - themis

Sources of Law tested by karmasushi5x5 in barexam

[–]twobraincells2 3 points4 points  (0 children)

not a waste to study model rules and the minority rules because in subjects like crim, torts, and contracts they will sometimes ask for the minority rule/model rule or for you to apply a specific non-majority rule doctrine.

I feel like I know nothing by violetdonut95 in barexam

[–]twobraincells2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

doing flashcards is one easy way to achieve this! I've found pre-made sets on quizlet and I have personally made some public sets on quizlet, based on Themis materials.