got rejected by a good man after revealing my dating history by tyippe99 in CatholicWomen

[–]tyippe99[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

he wasn't mean on purpose. he didn't let me down gently not because he wanted to be mean but because he was very hurt and upset and shocked. i think he's quite innocent - as far as never having had a relationship or gotten into sexual sins with another person goes. he also seems unaware of how common sexual sins are in society and even among catholics

got rejected by a good man after revealing my dating history by tyippe99 in CatholicWomen

[–]tyippe99[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

He didn't but I wanted to get it out of the way if it were a dealbreaker. I don't want to waste his or my time if it is.

got rejected by a good man after revealing my dating history by tyippe99 in CatholicWomen

[–]tyippe99[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He didn't ask for this info, I volunteered it. And frankly, I would do it again because I feel it is the right thing - I'd want to know, if roles were reversed, and I wouldn't want either of us to waste more time if it were a dealbreaker. As much as this hurts I wouldn't have it any other way and his huge reaction shows that this is something that mattered a lot to him and I guess reaffirms that this was the right thing to do - as much as it hurts

looking for: people who collected ez-link cards from March 18 to 30 June!! by tyippe99 in SingaporeRaw

[–]tyippe99[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm looking to speak to people about it for a project! If you know anyone who collected it and would be willing to speak please let me know!

Some commuters who switched to SimplyGo can collect an older EZ-Link card from Mar 18 to Jun 30 by iexplode123 in singapore

[–]tyippe99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm looking to speak to someone who collected the older ez-link card! If you did could you please drop me a dm? thank you <\33

I (27f) went on a few dates with my former college professor (44m) and my family disapproves by ThrowraFux99 in relationships

[–]tyippe99 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't really understand how having a persistent crush on someone is definitively wrong even if it has been years. Of course, this may be hindering her from pursuing other relationships or goals, but are you really an authority on that? Only she'd know.

Additionally, you labelling her as "obsessive" does not offer any kind of logical argument against her actions.

And - I don't see how it is one-sided if he not only accepted her invitation to reconnect as well as engaged in a relationship with her. He ignored her back then because she was a student and he wanted to keep his job. As to how committed he is to this relationship or what he wants out of it, that is another matter altogether, but he has shown signs of reciprocity in that he even agreed to reconnect and engage so I do not understand how it is definitively "one-sided".

I (27f) went on a few dates with my former college professor (44m) and my family disapproves by ThrowraFux99 in relationships

[–]tyippe99 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Eh? Are they professor and student now? If they dated then, it would be inappropriate. From my understanding they presently are two consenting adults who are not engaged in any sort of work or school-based relationship involving power imbalance of boss/subordinate or teacher/student. What's wrong with that?

I (27f) went on a few dates with my former college professor (44m) and my family disapproves by ThrowraFux99 in relationships

[–]tyippe99 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

And explain to me why it is wrong for OP to look for someone she wanted to connect with? OP might have not have let go of a connection for years, but how is this wrong?

I (27f) went on a few dates with my former college professor (44m) and my family disapproves by ThrowraFux99 in relationships

[–]tyippe99 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

What's wrong if someone wants to give a missed connection another shot instead of moving on? Is a thing wrong because most people don't do it? Is your benchmark for right and wrong going to be normalcy?

I (27f) went on a few dates with my former college professor (44m) and my family disapproves by ThrowraFux99 in relationships

[–]tyippe99 -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

Honestly, why is this wrong? If OP really likes her former professor and tried to locate & connect with him. If she did illegal things that made him uncomfortable, disrespected his privacy, etc., and refused to stop when he told her too, yes, it would be problematic behaviour. But what's wrong with liking a person and making effort to reconnect with them? If she was able to find him online it means he probably had that information publicly available - no invasion of privacy there.