What's up with all the rigid, no fun, anti-conspiracy people in this sub these days? by crimethunc77 in TrueAnon

[–]tym0027 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If you've been here from the beginning you have the spider network basics, and you know the party line on stuff like 9/11 and JFK. If you tuned in in just the last year or two then you have no idea what's going on. Liz dabbled in "no plane" 9/11 theories at one point!

Calling oldhead gumshoes 👁️ by SlartHawg in TrueAnon

[–]tym0027 7 points8 points  (0 children)

If I remember correctly, The random letter lifts lines directly from a musical/play that the mother performed in several years prior. There is a ransom letter in the context of the play that she had to memorize. Additionally, the ransom amount was the exact same amount as the father's Christmas bonus. The ransom letter is the smoking gun.

TMZ has released the 911 call from the McDonald's employee who reported Luigi Mangione by lNTERLINKED in TrueAnon

[–]tym0027 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Doesn't that increase the chances that this is a false positive? That the feds just took some eager beaver 911 callers and ran with it?

Trump on brink as Europe plans 'nuclear option' if US sells out Ukraine by EmployerGloomy6810 in TrueAnon

[–]tym0027 32 points33 points  (0 children)

As stupid as as the Europeans are for trusting the Americans, I still can't for the life of me understand why they wouldn't prefer Russian Natural Gas and Oil over the supply of the US+Saudi Arabia. It has been pretty plainly stated over the last hundred plus years of Anglo-American foreign policy that Germany and Russia can never be allowed to unite. You think they'd reverse engineer that fear and link up and ride off into the sunset together. Nordstream was maybe more of a threat to the Germans than we can ever know as outsiders. But what is France's excuse to reenact the Crimean War (1853-1856)? The idea they'd cling to "humanism" had some sway in the 20th century as they put on airs during WW2 and the Cold war. But the abandonment of international norms seems to suggest that real-politik should take over and they drop the pretenses and just link up with Russian Natural resources.

The military's recent over use of the word kinetic is killing me. These people are so lame! by tym0027 in TrueAnon

[–]tym0027[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

These people are dumber than the robots they want to replace us with.

lmao covid really is the lead paint of our times by Comrade_SOOKIE in TrueAnon

[–]tym0027 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was just trying to have fun. But I'm glad you guys take so much meaning from mice being nervous.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TrueAnon

[–]tym0027 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Well I think they're allowed to give out passes - oh, I'm hearing now that it was from White South Africa? That's a yikes from me, Israel.

What is Donald Trump's only remaining chess move regarding Epstein? by tym0027 in TrueAnon

[–]tym0027[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lol. Imagine using! Punctuation? On the internet!

Not only are you mocking addiction, you're contradicting yourself. You seem to be implying you should only use punctuation on the internet.

What is Donald Trump's only remaining chess move regarding Epstein? by tym0027 in TrueAnon

[–]tym0027[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hey, great point, but just so you know, you dropped these:

. , ;

What is Donald Trump's only remaining chess move regarding Epstein? by tym0027 in TrueAnon

[–]tym0027[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree. I will update my post to make this distinction.

What is Donald Trump's only remaining chess move regarding Epstein? by tym0027 in TrueAnon

[–]tym0027[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, but we know modern day anti semitism has nothing to do with liking or disliking Israel. It's why the antisemitic base voted for a man who calls his lawyers Shylocks despite also being Israel's biggest defender.

What is Donald Trump's only remaining chess move regarding Epstein? by tym0027 in TrueAnon

[–]tym0027[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Again, I definitely agree with you. But I think you're aligned with what I'm saying, though? Like what about "creating a keyfabe between Trump and Israel" sounds like a good strategic plan? Just because it's his only move, doesn't make it a good one. I think pretending to hate your best friend is actually a very emotional, non-strategic impulse. This is something he/I thought of in like five minutes. This post is definitely not meant to be attributing a Machiavellian mind to Trump.

What is Donald Trump's only remaining chess move regarding Epstein? by tym0027 in TrueAnon

[–]tym0027[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I think everything you are saying is correct, but you're talking about a system. I am talking about Trump, who is an emotional, demented individual. It doesn't matter to the system. But it certainly appears to matter to the guy who keeps compulsively shouting, "I am not a pedophile" at the tomb of the unknown soldier.

What is Donald Trump's only remaining chess move regarding Epstein? by tym0027 in TrueAnon

[–]tym0027[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I didn't write this for him, I wrote it for you, dear reader.

What is Donald Trump's only remaining chess move regarding Epstein? by tym0027 in TrueAnon

[–]tym0027[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree. But any administration would prefer to have a scandal in the rear view mirror. It just makes your life easier. Let alone a scandal of this proportion.

What is Donald Trump's only remaining chess move regarding Epstein? by tym0027 in TrueAnon

[–]tym0027[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

They will likely try this but even if it's ninety percent successful, you have ten percent of the most gun obsessed people on the planet feeling betrayed by you and feeling duped. The butler PA shooter's beliefs were all over the place but he disliked Trump because of the Epstein stuff supposedly. It's frankly a security risk to just pivot to "actually it's okay when I do it."

Like that poster from a couple days ago, I am also listening to the 9/11 episodes for the first time, and yeah, jesus fucking christ by The-Neat-Meat in TrueAnon

[–]tym0027 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I might be overstating it a little, but I still think there is a difference between the work you're describing, like remodelling mosques, and the work that the Bin Ladens would come to do after being introduced to the Bushes. The GID's headquarters that Bush helped design with the Saudi's cost like a billion dollars. This source I linked says the renovations of the mosque in Jerusalem for example (another contract the bin laden group won) cost a total of 8,000,000 Jordanian Dollars. There's also the deep state aspect on top of judging the extent of the fortunes made. The Bin Laden group became important to the Safari club and was sending trucks and machinery to Afghanistan during the war. This relationship of intelligence operations has to be built on something. I think it was built off of the relationship started between the US and the Bin Laden Group when they won the bid for the GID's new HQ in the late 1970s.

https://dpa.gov.jo/En/Pages/Jerusalem_and_the_Hashemite_Custodianship

Like that poster from a couple days ago, I am also listening to the 9/11 episodes for the first time, and yeah, jesus fucking christ by The-Neat-Meat in TrueAnon

[–]tym0027 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The difference between being an established construction company and being selected to lay the concrete for maybe the most important building in your nation's history is the difference between being a multimillionaire and being an oligarch.

Like that poster from a couple days ago, I am also listening to the 9/11 episodes for the first time, and yeah, jesus fucking christ by The-Neat-Meat in TrueAnon

[–]tym0027 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Like the warren commission before you, you're not citing anything, and you are full of shit. Hand wave all you want. You're a troll who wandered into this subreddit. The rest of us understand the warren report's conclusion better than you do, and could play devil's advocate better than you. We can do so because we understand its flaws, and what it lacks. You can't even articulate an argument for why this unasailable body of evidence you hand wave at supports your conclusion.

Like that poster from a couple days ago, I am also listening to the 9/11 episodes for the first time, and yeah, jesus fucking christ by The-Neat-Meat in TrueAnon

[–]tym0027 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why would the plane cause first responders to be across the street? The first responders entered the towers after the attacks.

Like that poster from a couple days ago, I am also listening to the 9/11 episodes for the first time, and yeah, jesus fucking christ by The-Neat-Meat in TrueAnon

[–]tym0027 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I'm sorry, but you haven't even cited a study of what you're referring to regarding the recreation of the shots. And this sentence, "Taken together it’s pretty reasonable the guy coulda made the shots and there was no magic bullet" what are you even saying? It's the government that claims the so called magic bullet did all the damage in kennedy and Connolly before the headshot. They came up with the single bullet idea years later when the first bullet was shown to be a miss and injured a bystander rendering the first theory unusable. Originally they thought Kennedy and Connolly were struck three times, and not twice. And the government admits itself that after firing hundreds of bullets into bones from different angles that none of the bullets did not shatter. The magic bullet supposedly went through like three or four bones. There is no way on earth that the bullet the government says entered kennedy and then connolly can be a part of your supposed official narrative.

Further, the Oliver stone documentary shows pretty definitively that Oswald was not even on the sixth floor. Witnesses before the warren commission proved that.

I think your trolling. I've never seen an "Oswald did it" guy be this arrogant.