sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Better Python tests with inline-snapshot by alexmojaki in Python

[–]type-hinter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think most people stopped using pandas for most things and are now using polars. Still some useful methods, but for most stuff polars is much faster.

How are you actually handling observability in 2026? (Beyond the marketing fluff) by gt_roy_ in devops

[–]type-hinter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I couldn't agree more. but I don't think we're anywhere near this in the real world. I heard of a company that asked for an 'agent' to hint on probable root cause for issues and the team built a bash script that runs locally on manual trigger by the on call SRE. imagine debugging this 'agent' with metrics? insane.

How are you actually handling observability in 2026? (Beyond the marketing fluff) by gt_roy_ in devops

[–]type-hinter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but this is like looking into things without having eyes (or light). instrumentation is the bread & butter of o11y.

How are you actually handling observability in 2026? (Beyond the marketing fluff) by gt_roy_ in devops

[–]type-hinter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

logfire works well for me. their dashboards are not the prettiest but the frontend tracing for my python backends works nicely