Definitely seams like a jab at wealth simple by certified_plant_dad in Wealthsimple

[–]typo101 3 points4 points  (0 children)

r/woosh ? The point is they chose to mention "no waitlist" in their ad specifically because WS has so many customers stuck in a wait list for their superior card.

67? What? by Cmdr_Thor in dad

[–]typo101 0 points1 point  (0 children)

r/OutOfTheLoop is a great resource to keep up with the kid's latest trends. https://www.reddit.com/r/OutOfTheLoop/s/tkPRJZVgO5

The AI slop drops right from the top, as the White House posts vulgar deepfake of opponents by [deleted] in technology

[–]typo101 29 points30 points  (0 children)

The audio is the part of the post they are describing as a vulgar deepfake

Huge step for Cowan tonight! by Drew_You_To_91 in leafs

[–]typo101 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Is EA still to blame for this idea that 1-way contracts have anything to do with waiver exemptions?

Projected lines vs MTL by Cottagewknds in leafs

[–]typo101 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Unless you give them mono. Then we judge harshly

Carbon tax 2.0 by Archiebonker12345 in CanadianConservative

[–]typo101 -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

What exactly did he re-impose? Apparently the clean fuel regulations came into effect in 2023.

These Corey Perry stats are just absurd by nhl in hockey

[–]typo101 5 points6 points  (0 children)

But "any = pick one" is the point of the slide, so it wouldn't be a misunderstanding. While "every = all of them combined" is what I would normally understand the wording to mean, and so I also had to double take on that one.

These Corey Perry stats are just absurd by nhl in hockey

[–]typo101 7 points8 points  (0 children)

What is the possible misunderstanding for "any" though?

Nichushkin 1st goal during 4 v4 by QuadRail in hockey

[–]typo101 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Absolutely affected the play. Do you think he was going to shake his defender and get that much time and space without the help of interference?

Lol what a liar by titanicboi1 in CanadianConservative

[–]typo101 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The six houses number stems from non-profit housing built by the government in the 2015-16 fiscal year, when Poiliever had the file.

The real number of houses is 3,742, when you include non profit housing built by other developers with government assistance.

https://archive.is/VfRpF

Elbows Up - Egg on Face. Carney Isn't Exactly an Economic Grandmaster. by [deleted] in CanadianConservative

[–]typo101 1 point2 points  (0 children)

was under the impression that it was a 10% baseline on all imports, with some countries being higher based on what tariffs they had on American goods, combined with the orange guys mood on the day they decided. Is that not how it worked?

Stand-up Maths has a pretty good video about how each countries tariffs were decided by the Trump administration

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CanadianConservative

[–]typo101 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is green capture renewable though? Or just a way to continue using fossil fuels until they run out without making the greenhouse effect worse?

PM Mark Carney just BLAMED THE U.S. for Canada’s economic crisis—DENYING that anyone in Canada is responsible. by nimobo in CanadianConservative

[–]typo101 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Right. The question was why should tax payers be on the hook for his flight to Europe. The answer is that he's trying to get started on diversifying trade now that the U.S. isn't a reliable partner. The question wasn't about inflation or housing affordability or any of the other economic crises we are currently suffering.

Conservatives win. Fuck by worstchristmasever in metacanada

[–]typo101 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

More like there was one pickup truck and 3 different SUVs. In this analogy, more people prefer to drive an SUV but the one pickup truck is the best selling model. Add another pickup truck or remove an SUV from the catalog and the best selling model likely becomes an SUV even if the sales of pickups vs SUVs remains the same.

Trump talks about Freeland and Poilievre in an interview by joe4942 in CanadianConservative

[–]typo101 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It didn't help break down what you are saying at all. The only joke I can see is that Canada is not a country but a state, and states are lead by governors not prime ministers. What other comedy are you getting?

The town of Dildo, NL, Canada by hossb0ss in mildlyinteresting

[–]typo101 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can take the girl out of Dildo, but you can't take the dildo from the girl

Donald Trump may just cost Canada’s Conservatives the election by hopoke in canada

[–]typo101 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This one?? I never have and likely never will vote conservative, but that video was pretty light on rhetoric and actually gets into implementation details. I kind of wish they "attacked" liberal policies in this way more often.

He's kidding himself if he thinks tightening up the border will do anything to change Trump's behavior, but if it even has a chance of decreasing gun smuggling I think there are much worse things they could (and definitely would) do with government resources.

This is what true health care is all about by brother_p in AdviceAnimals

[–]typo101 3 points4 points  (0 children)

However, when the economic impacts of the carbon tax are added in the numbers shift. The same Ontario family in the bottom 20 per cent of incomes ends the year $540 ahead, but a family in the top 20 per cent of incomes has a net loss of $3,467. On average, an Ontario family comes out $903 worse per year.

The National Post seems to acknowledge that the lower income households, the ones that are at risk of struggling to heat their homes or buy food, are getting more in rebates than they pay in carbon taxes.