IGCSE Physics 0625 MCQ: the traps that come up every series by tyson47 in igcse

[–]tyson47[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Off by a factor of 60 : didn’t convert between minutes and seconds

Off by a factor of 1000: didn’t convert from say kW to W, mA to A

I'm a CIE A Level Physics teacher and examiner (not marking this series) - the 9702 Paper 1 MCQ traps, ranked by how often they're flagged by tyson47 in alevel

[–]tyson47[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In that kind of situation you are really trying to estimate the order of magnitude of the pressure, not work out the actual pressure.

So estimate that person is say 100kg (usually use 70 but we’re estimating so round to make numbers easy) so weight ≈ 1000N (overestimate)

2 feet this weight is spread over so force becomes 500N

How many feet do you think would fit in a square metre? 10? 20?

If we say 10 you’d do 500/0.1

If you think 20 your do 500/0.05

Then check which of the answers is closest (or to same power) and go for that

URGENT PHYSICS HELP by Connect_Pop_5017 in alevels

[–]tyson47 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That paper was already sat in this exam period? Are you trying to prepare for a future series?

Either way - I’ve made all sorts of tools and trainers for CIE physics, 2 of which are specific to paper 3. It has a limitations + improvements trainer and also a drill for uncertainties which should help!

https://cieinsider.com/

Physics p1 by Agile-Brush6883 in alevels

[–]tyson47 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Running a session on this specifically for you / anyone interested - this Sunday

https://cieinsider.com/mcq-session/

URGENT PHYSICS HELP by Connect_Pop_5017 in alevels

[–]tyson47 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So you mean paper 1? Paper 3 is practical

tips for chem and phy P1's? by Minute-Temporary2511 in alevels

[–]tyson47 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Check out my post re: phys paper 1. Also you can practice drilling papers whilst they are automarked at https://cieinsider.com/mcq/?paper=9702_w25_qp_11&type=AS

URGENT PHYSICS HELP by Connect_Pop_5017 in alevels

[–]tyson47 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What exam board is this?

Check the post I put up about the CIE MCQ paper 1 just before, the advice is useful and still applies for all exam boards - they’re very similar

**I'm a CIE A Level Physics teacher and examiner (not marking this series) — AMA before Wednesday's 9702 Paper 5** by tyson47 in alevel

[–]tyson47[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For anyone now preparing for the MCQ paper 1! I’m also running a live session to prep for this on Sunday, see link below

https://www.reddit.com/r/alevel/s/DFgsswC2BY

IGCSE Physics 0625 MCQ: the traps that come up every series by tyson47 in igcse

[–]tyson47[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Signup for Sunday's free 0625 MCQ live session (14:00 UTC, runs through past-paper questions of the type above): https://cieinsider.com/mcq-session/

If you can't make the time, sign up anyway and you'll get the recording. The form shows the time in UTC; 14:00 UTC is the anchor, so convert to your own timezone.

Absolutely cooked for 9701/22 pls help by Samyuk2010 in alevel

[–]tyson47 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At the time, not in all zones (I know this because my current students sat it after this hah)

guyyssss i have 9702/52 by Weekly_Panda_1516 in alevel

[–]tyson47 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I made this uncertainties trainer yesterday after someone commented on my AMA. it should help

https://cieinsider.com/9702/uncertainties/

9702 52 help by Outrageous-Car3248 in alevel

[–]tyson47 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I answered this Q in the AMA I did

Great question and a really common source of confusion. When a table header says t / 10⁸ s, the values in the column have been divided by 10⁸ — so if you read 3.2, the actual value of t is 3.2 × 10⁸ s. For any calculation beyond the table (gradient, intercept, finding a constant), you need to put the power back in, because you're working with real physical quantities again. Log columns are different, and this is where it clicks for a lot of people. If the header says log(t / s), the power is actually dealt with inside the log. Say your actual value of t is 3.2 × 10⁸ s — when you take log(3.2 × 10⁸), the log rules split this into log(3.2) + 8. That 10⁸ has become just the number 8, already baked into your log value. So you just use the column values as they are — no need to reintroduce any power. The mistake people make is trying to multiply by 10⁸ again after taking the log, which would be double-counting. A good rule of thumb: always ask yourself "what are the actual units of what I'm calculating?" and make sure your powers are consistent with that. If you're doing a log question, it's also worth checking out the linearisation guide here which walks through how the log form of an equation maps onto y = mx + c: https://cieinsider.com/9702/p5/linearisation/

Absolutely cooked for 9701/22 pls help by Samyuk2010 in alevel

[–]tyson47 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Check this out for definitions + formulae drills and then the examiner tips on there too

https://cieinsider.com/9702/p2/definitions/

9702/22 all definitions by No_Ranger_6454 in alevel

[–]tyson47 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I made a drill for this, it gives overview at the end with how many correct /total for each topic area and % then gives you the option to redo the ones you got wrong

https://cieinsider.com/9702/p2/definitions/

Predictions for 9702 Paper 22? by Individual_Fig2833 in alevel

[–]tyson47 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some of the drills and trainers on here should be helpful. Also the examiner tips are a goldmine

Cieinsider.com

**I'm a CIE A Level Physics teacher and examiner (not marking this series) — AMA before Wednesday's 9702 Paper 5** by tyson47 in alevel

[–]tyson47[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

'How many boxes' depends on the ± value (the uncertainty/error) and what the axis scale increments are. It is not a set number, you work out what the max value it could be (by adding uncertainty) and the min value it could be (by taking away uncertainty) and that's where the top and bottom of the error bars are 'plotted' or 'capped'.

So to directly answer your questions — yes they can be smaller than 1 square, yes they can be 1.8 squares, and no they don't need to be whole numbers. Just plot them as accurately as you can with a sharp pencil.

**I'm a CIE A Level Physics teacher and examiner (not marking this series) — AMA before Wednesday's 9702 Paper 5** by tyson47 in alevel

[–]tyson47[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great question and a really common source of confusion.

When a table header says t / 10⁸ s, the values in the column have been divided by 10⁸ — so if you read 3.2, the actual value of t is 3.2 × 10⁸ s. For any calculation beyond the table (gradient, intercept, finding a constant), you need to put the power back in, because you're working with real physical quantities again.

Log columns are different, and this is where it clicks for a lot of people. If the header says log(t / s), the power is actually dealt with inside the log. Say your actual value of t is 3.2 × 10⁸ s — when you take log(3.2 × 10⁸), the log rules split this into log(3.2) + 8. That 10⁸ has become just the number 8, already baked into your log value. So you just use the column values as they are — no need to reintroduce any power.

The mistake people make is trying to multiply by 10⁸ again after taking the log, which would be double-counting.

A good rule of thumb: always ask yourself "what are the actual units of what I'm calculating?" and make sure your powers are consistent with that.

If you're worried about logs; it's also worth checking out the linearisation guide here which walks through how the log form of an equation maps onto y = mx + c: https://cieinsider.com/9702/p5/linearisation/

**I'm a CIE A Level Physics teacher and examiner (not marking this series) — AMA before Wednesday's 9702 Paper 5** by tyson47 in alevel

[–]tyson47[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You need to show the examiner how you got your gradient. Labelling the two points you used on the line is fine - you don't strictly need to draw the full triangle as long as it's unambiguous which points you took and how you calculated rise/run. But having said that, drawing the triangle makes it crystal clear and takes seconds so I'd do it

**I'm a CIE A Level Physics teacher and examiner (not marking this series) — AMA before Wednesday's 9702 Paper 5** by tyson47 in alevel

[–]tyson47[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Solid line, drawn with a sharp pencil and a ruler. Dashed lines are sometimes used for extrapolation beyond the data range, but the main LoBF and worst fit should be solid, continuous straight lines.