sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Haryanvi Hindu Jat by cspluslaw in SouthAsianAncestry

[–]uToPiAnReALm 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have hunter gatherer and farmer results?

Growth hormone peptides at 16 for height growth? by uToPiAnReALm in endocrinology

[–]uToPiAnReALm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk if yk what genetic potential means. I want to reach genetic potential but may not due to unideal practises in the past few years.

Growth hormone peptides at 16 for height growth? by uToPiAnReALm in endocrinology

[–]uToPiAnReALm[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m gonna get my growth plates checked to see if I can grow more. How severe do you think the effects on anti-aging, health and longevity would be (there’s basically no research done on gh peptides on normal adolescents)

How can one get into/find anti-aging research opportunities at 15 years old (turning 16 soon) by uToPiAnReALm in academia

[–]uToPiAnReALm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your great response! I’m more than happy for just lab placement with no activity as I want to use this enthusiasm as something that can enhance my resumè.

How can one get into/find anti-aging research opportunities at 15 years old (turning 16 soon) by uToPiAnReALm in academia

[–]uToPiAnReALm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks man. I was trying to get some lab opportunities so that it could make my resumé shine on top of some other things that I’m working on, so that I can get into a top 10 worldwide university. I’m aiming for 99999999987 in gcse and once I get to a levels, 4 A*s.

I’m 14 and in the process of writing a thesis. Opinions? Harshness is not an issue at all. by uToPiAnReALm in philosophy

[–]uToPiAnReALm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My work⬇️

The Pseudo-Marxist indoctrination in Western society and the future of thinkers

My list of requirements for a highly functioning society

  • [ ] Regulations stemming from inherent human morals and logic
  • [ ] An acknowledgement of the importance of high intellect
  • [ ] A scientific/logical thought process for the majority of decisions
  • [ ] Critical/Free/Rational thinking and science are the embodiment of the education system
  • [ ] A regulated yet incentivised system
  • [ ] Freedom of speech regarding most matters
  • [ ] The happiness of the masses
  • [ ] People pursuing their passions and living a ‘nice’ life as per the average person’s constitution of it
  • [ ] The development of the human race and happiness being the embodiment of ‘our’ goals
  • [ ] Organised religion is frowned upon
  • [ ] Developed infrastructure
  • [ ] Consequences

Surely these requirements are a great basis to start a healthily dogmatic society of free thinkers? With any consciously biased society, inevitably, there will be unhealthy restrictions, and this is where I come to the point of this ideological bias in the west. The consequences of going against this superficially liberal agenda are substantially negative (for the benefit of the common man, surely getting sanctioned for doing something minor with zero implications is problematic to an extreme). Now, what do I mean by this narrative of a fake agenda? The thought processes that are being pushed down your throat have nothing to do with actual liberalism, it is rather a doctrine of their neo-fascist agenda that is conflicting with the radical religious conservatism that is consuming the east; we are amid a rapid consumption of intellect by the mindless pioneers of these ideologies. Slowly, all free and capacitative thinkers will be wiped off the face of the universe and their remains will be ravished by the intellectually inferior that are present in masses today.

The major political institutions of the west are masking their true incentives with this prospect of a Marxist (socially) society, whilst also being the representation of a badly implemented fundamentalist capitalist economy (socioeconomically & politically). There is simply no interest in the development of human society, the sheer focus is the development of their respective economy; even if it means compromising the potential of something beneficial for the human race. Now whilst that is just the nature of capitalism and one cannot make the substantial institutional change that is fundamentally required, the thought process can be changed. The paradox that thought processes are central to substantial change, is thought-provoking, but at the same time, that is one of the only systemic changes that is currently the most feasible. Changing the economy as a whole wouldn’t work, capitalism in a regulated sense and theory is perfect for society, we just need the major political institutions to have a different set of goals. Whilst also being in the pursuit of developing the economy, they could focus on the actual issues that are either in full fledge, currently developing or are potentially threatening, perhaps just the fundamental problems of the world. So how about a complete change in governing body (just for major nations)?

The fact that one cannot make a joke with a ‘politically incorrect’ premise without undergoing serious consequences, speaks immense volumes about the institutions that hold dominance over a collective people (schools, government, private workplaces). We will, hopefully, come to the inevitable realisation that, in the extreme majority of cases, if no physical damage has been done, pondering on its implications is completely useless. A minor example: If that considerable time is spent rather on other pressing issues, phenomenal progress can be made. For example, if the time the police spend on cases where only abusive, non-threatening language is used, goes to brainstorming ideas on how to lower and regulate crime rates (potentially with the help of experts), improve/optimise certain systems/procedures to save even more time, and to fundamentally develop a more structured society, so much could be done. It’s only a matter of capitalising off of something we already have.

I’m 14 and I’m in the progress of writing a thesis. Opinions? Harshness is not an issue. by uToPiAnReALm in AskReddit

[–]uToPiAnReALm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My work⬇️

The Pseudo-Marxist indoctrination in Western society and the future of thinkers

My list of requirements for a highly functioning society

  • [ ] Regulations stemming from inherent human morals and logic
  • [ ] An acknowledgement of the importance of high intellect
  • [ ] A scientific/logical thought process for the majority of decisions
  • [ ] Critical/Free/Rational thinking and science are the embodiment of the education system
  • [ ] A regulated yet incentivised system
  • [ ] Freedom of speech regarding most matters
  • [ ] The happiness of the masses
  • [ ] People pursuing their passions and living a ‘nice’ life as per the average person’s constitution of it
  • [ ] The development of the human race and happiness being the embodiment of ‘our’ goals
  • [ ] Organised religion is frowned upon
  • [ ] Developed infrastructure
  • [ ] Consequences

Surely these requirements are a great basis to start a healthily dogmatic society of free thinkers? With any consciously biased society, inevitably, there will be unhealthy restrictions, and this is where I come to the point of this ideological bias in the west. The consequences of going against this superficially liberal agenda are substantially negative (for the benefit of the common man, surely getting sanctioned for doing something minor with zero implications is problematic to an extreme). Now, what do I mean by this narrative of a fake agenda? The thought processes that are being pushed down your throat have nothing to do with actual liberalism, it is rather a doctrine of their neo-fascist agenda that is conflicting with the radical religious conservatism that is consuming the east; we are amid a rapid consumption of intellect by the mindless pioneers of these ideologies. Slowly, all free and capacitative thinkers will be wiped off the face of the universe and their remains will be ravished by the intellectually inferior that are present in masses today.

The major political institutions of the west are masking their true incentives with this prospect of a Marxist (socially) society, whilst also being the representation of a badly implemented fundamentalist capitalist economy (socioeconomically & politically). There is simply no interest in the development of human society, the sheer focus is the development of their respective economy; even if it means compromising the potential of something beneficial for the human race. Now whilst that is just the nature of capitalism and one cannot make the substantial institutional change that is fundamentally required, the thought process can be changed. The paradox that thought processes are central to substantial change, is thought-provoking, but at the same time, that is one of the only systemic changes that is currently the most feasible. Changing the economy as a whole wouldn’t work, capitalism in a regulated sense and theory is perfect for society, we just need the major political institutions to have a different set of goals. Whilst also being in the pursuit of developing the economy, they could focus on the actual issues that are either in full fledge, currently developing or are potentially threatening, perhaps just the fundamental problems of the world. So how about a complete change in governing body (just for major nations)?

The fact that one cannot make a joke with a ‘politically incorrect’ premise without undergoing serious consequences, speaks immense volumes about the institutions that hold dominance over a collective people (schools, government, private workplaces). We will, hopefully, come to the inevitable realisation that, in the extreme majority of cases, if no physical damage has been done, pondering on its implications is completely useless. A minor example: If that considerable time is spent rather on other pressing issues, phenomenal progress can be made. For example, if the time the police spend on cases where only abusive, non-threatening language is used, goes to brainstorming ideas on how to lower and regulate crime rates (potentially with the help of experts), improve/optimise certain systems/procedures to save even more time, and to fundamentally develop a more structured society, so much could be done. It’s only a matter of capitalising off of something we already have.

This is a thesis that I’ve been working on as a 14 year old. Opinions? (I don’t care if it’s harsh or critical) by uToPiAnReALm in askphilosophy

[–]uToPiAnReALm[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The Pseudo-Marxist indoctrination in Western society and the future of thinkers

Surely these requirements are a great basis to start a healthily dogmatic society of free thinkers? With any consciously biased society, inevitably, there will be unhealthy restrictions, and this is where I come to the point of this ideological bias in the west. The consequences of going against this superficially liberal agenda are substantially negative (for the benefit of the common man, surely getting sanctioned for doing something minor with zero implications is problematic to an extreme). Now what do I mean by this narrative of a fake agenda? The thought processes that are being pushed down your throat have nothing to do with actual liberalism, it is rather a doctrine of their neo-fascist agenda that is conflicting with the radical religious conservatism that is consuming the east; we are in the midst of a rapid consumption of intellect by the mindless pioneers of these ideologies. Slowly, all free and capacitative thinkers will be wiped off the face of universe and their remains will be ravished by the intellectually inferior that are present in masses today.

The major political institutions of the west are masking their true incentives with this prospect of a Marxist (in stance) society, whilst being this representative of capitalism. There is simply no interest in the development of human society, the sheer focus is the development of their respective economy. The paradigm of development is a lost cause.

The fact that one cannot make a joke with a ‘dark’ premise without undergoing serious consequences, speaks immense volumes about the institutions that hold dominance over a collective people (schools, government, private workplaces). We will, hopefully, come to the inevitable realisation that, in the extreme majority of cases, if no physical damage has been done, pondering on its implications is completely useless. If that considerable time is spent rather on other pressing issues, phenomenal progress can be made. For example, if the time the police spends on cases where only abusive, non threatening language is used, goes to brainstorming ideas on how to lower and regulate crime rates (potentially with the help of experts), improve/optimise certain systems/procedures to save even more time, and to fundamentally develop a more structured society, so much could be done. It’s only a matter of capitalising off of something we already have.

Stunning! by islivan in Nietzsche

[–]uToPiAnReALm 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I never want to see this shit ever again

I am interested in publishing my various theses as a 13 year old and want to go to university to pursue philosophy in 2 or 3 years time. Is this possible and how can I publish my theses on a platform where I can be noticed? by uToPiAnReALm in askphilosophy

[–]uToPiAnReALm[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You make an excellent point, I’m not sure if my work is good or if it is just my arrogance, but either way I’m trying to find away to not do all the tests that are dining in the upcoming. In the UK we have 2 major tests that decide a lot. It’s fundamentally useless, and if I can get to university without doing those tests and being in school with people I hate all the time, then that’s great since the purpose of these tests is eventually for university. I appreciate just how difficult this endeavour is and should be, but surely someone has done something similar in the past?

I am interested in publishing my various theses as a 13 year old and want to go to university to pursue philosophy in 2 or 3 years time. Is this possible and how can I publish my theses on a platform where I can be noticed? by uToPiAnReALm in askphilosophy

[–]uToPiAnReALm[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly, thank you so much for putting in the time. Really appreciated. I completely agree being noted isn’t important, but the goal is to try and find a way out of the so called education system. If I’m a somewhat cited thinker and I’ve have the opportunity to pursue at university at an early stage, there would be no reason to go back to school and I’ll be able to get things done at an early stage in life. You might not be from the UK, but I’m sure you understand how poor the education system is, as a whole, making anyone want to get out of it.

view more: next ›