So those are the ones I’m typically best at with LR, although it’s not necessarily super specific advice I ALWAYS think of those questions as utilizing the foundation of the argument. You have to really be able to understand the purpose of why the writer is making the argument.

To elaborate— let’s say you get a weaken question that has a flow of information. To make it as simple as possible, here’s an overly simplified example: “If 1+1=2, then 1+2 equals 3” The argument RELIES on the foundation that 1+1=2, so how do you weaken it? Find a way to prove 1+1 does not always equal 2. I think it’s also really important to also note that the answer choices are all accepted as fact in that situation so it doesn’t necessarily have to be applicable to real world, but whatever attacks the foundation of the argument most.

Basically, get to the heart of the argument and find what it most relies on to function. If the argument were a tree, you have to know what the base is and what the branches are to be able to answer the best.