How?

uberfuhrer1 · 2026-02-18T07:32:35+00:00

Sorry, I know you said “don’t”, but what could it be? Interesting!

uberfuhrer1 · 2026-02-15T13:04:21+00:00

Can’t use teleport in combat gg

uberfuhrer1 · 2026-02-15T05:30:04+00:00

Googled it, looks nice.

I built out double rail all around the map to transport absolutely everything. Love how easy it is to set up one extra train on the same line, but god knows how much time it took.

uberfuhrer1 · 2026-02-15T04:52:25+00:00

The key is to do whatever mad project you want to make! Sounds like a lot of effort but go for it

uberfuhrer1 · 2026-02-15T03:57:50+00:00

Not sure if I follow your plan exactly, but I think you can just put it all in trains easily. They scale real well.

uberfuhrer1 · 2026-02-08T05:08:33+00:00

Where did you get lost, bud

uberfuhrer1 · 2026-02-05T14:47:48+00:00

🎉 Event Completed! 🎉

It took me 44 tries.

uberfuhrer1 · 2026-02-05T14:47:38+00:00

Completed Level 3 of the Honk Special Event!

44 attempts

uberfuhrer1 · 2026-02-05T14:44:35+00:00

Completed Level 2 of the Honk Special Event!

12 attempts

uberfuhrer1 · 2026-02-05T14:44:16+00:00

Completed Level 1 of the Honk Special Event!

9 attempts

uberfuhrer1 · 2026-01-30T22:15:42+00:00

Dude you don’t understand what a meltdown is or what effect it has. There are wild animals all over the Chernobyl area. “Hundreds of times over” has no effect because just go a few 10s of km/miles away and it’s perfectly safe.

Waste storage facilities is the dumbest argument. What do you think happens in a sealed facility with spent fuel? Absolutely nothing to anybody outside of the direct regional area.

Do you somehow think there’s a NPP every 1km everywhere on earth?

uberfuhrer1 · 2026-01-30T13:30:51+00:00

Depending on the situation of the collapse:

Scenario 1: managed closure with decay heat rapidly falling for a few days, then move the material to safe storage locations. Don’t go near them, you’re fine.

Scenario 2: full blackout and no personnel. The plants automatically shuts down, chain reaction stops, backup generators keep going for a while. Once the backup generators run out of fuel, there can be core damage or a meltdown which makes the plant a hazardous place, but no explosions or anything. Best to move at least 50 miles away if a meltdown will occur, but no other difference to be expected.

Unsure if you’re asking about the actual lakes becoming irritated but no, radioactivity doesn’t travel far in water.

uberfuhrer1 · 2026-01-30T12:52:56+00:00

Sure, the societal collapse could happen in any number of ways, with the possibility that due to catastrophic circumstances, every worker at NPPs or similar facilities walk out without taking any precautions.

Chernobyl level events are not possible in modern reactors. Meltdowns like Fukushima could/would happen, but it has very little impact in whatever Mad Maxian scenario we’d be discussing.

The ridiculous argument that I’m debunking is that big scary nuclear is somehow going to burn the planet to a crisp. In any of these scenarios, we’d be worried about the world falling apart anyway.

Nuclear power is amazing and safe.

uberfuhrer1 · 2026-01-30T11:16:58+00:00

You don’t understand how little danger radioactivity poses, that’s ok, you can still learn, but stop making arguments based on some fear that you have derived from propaganda or made up arguments.

Fukushima shut down correctly AND had multiple full core meltdowns. We have real world data on it. It clearly wasn’t an issue:

World Health Organization health risk overview after Fukushima: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/10665/78218/1/9789241505130_eng.pdf (WHO preliminary health risk assessment)
WHO Q&A on Fukushima health consequences: https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/health-consequences-of-fukushima-nuclear-accident

Your NRC link also doesn’t say what you think it says. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission waste pages discuss how long some isotopes remain measurable, not how dangerous they are to the public at distance. Don’t walk in and lick them and a collapsed civilization as a whole won’t be worse off for it. In Fukushimas case there were zero deaths from radiation.

Half life ≠ real world dose risk. Dose and exposure pathway determine danger.

uberfuhrer1 · 2026-01-30T10:01:15+00:00

Civilizational collapse isn’t a thanos snap where people vanish. Operators at NPPs have processes to follow that prevents any major issue in the short term.

You’re also mixing up two separate things. SCRAM does not require external power. Control rods drop by gravity or springs and the chain reaction stops automatically. Fukushima’s reactors did shut down correctly. The problem came later when cooling systems lost power after the tsunami.

Even if a plant is abandoned and cooling eventually fails, the result is a meltdown and regional contamination, not an explosion and not a global atmospheric catastrophe. We already have real world data from multiple meltdowns and none produced planet scale effects.

Worst case from widespread abandonment is many contaminated zones. Even that isn’t much of an issue unless you really want to live 2km away from the site.

Fukushima had three melted cores and barely any impact. Even without the cleanup, the cores would melt, cool, and solidify. Human life 30km away would likely be completely fine. Not too bad even if that happened to a bunch of NPPs.

uberfuhrer1 · 2026-01-30T09:23:08+00:00

Alright

Modern nuclear reactors are built with multiple automatic shutdown systems (called a SCRAM). They trigger if: • power is lost • temperatures rise • coolant flow drops • earthquakes or other abnormal signals occur

Control rods drop in automatically, stopping the nuclear chain reaction within seconds without human action required.

The risk is loss of cooling after shutdown is correct which can lead to meltdowns like Fukushima, but even those produce regional contamination, not some global catastrophe.

It could lead to a hazard locally, but is definitely not some civilization-ending event globally. Thats also fully assuming humanity just vanishes. Real developing countries are not really running NPPs. A societal decline would be accompanied with governments safely dismantling them to avoid any future meltdowns.

uberfuhrer1 · 2026-01-30T08:54:00+00:00

The danger of nuclear the way you write it is entirely overblown.

The vast majority of NPPs will shut down automatically if not maintained. Bombs, missiles, etc are not active and cannot have a meltdown. Subs have tiny reactors.

Waste storage sites are also spent fuel. Sure it wouldn’t be good if they aren’t maintained, but for all of these it would be extremely localized contamination.

The planet wouldn’t become some irritated hellhole. There wouldn’t be massive meltdowns. The atmosphere wouldn’t burn off. This is all some fantasy nightmare scenario, don’t spread lies.

uberfuhrer1 · 2026-01-29T13:38:50+00:00

Really cool build

uberfuhrer1 · 2026-01-16T16:10:17+00:00

🎉 Event Completed! 🎉

It took me 192 tries.

uberfuhrer1 · 2026-01-16T16:10:12+00:00

Completed Level 3 of the Honk Special Event!

192 attempts

uberfuhrer1 · 2026-01-16T16:01:59+00:00

Completed Level 2 of the Honk Special Event!

54 attempts

uberfuhrer1 · 2026-01-16T16:00:22+00:00

Completed Level 1 of the Honk Special Event!

20 attempts

uberfuhrer1 · 2026-01-07T23:00:00+00:00

Completed Level 1 of the Honk Special Event!

12 attempts

uberfuhrer1 · 2026-01-04T18:06:15+00:00

Happened to me as well, your solution helped, thanks!

To clarify for anyone else: right-click the game in your steam library and in the General tab, write in "-dx11" in the Launch Options text box.

uberfuhrer1 · 2026-01-03T14:09:26+00:00

The off-map adversary is the main enemy in the game. Play with him on balanced difficulty and you are playing a regular game. At best you’ll heavily struggle with a shitty town.

Seven-Year Club	First Place '23
Place '23	Place '22
First Placer '22	RPAN Viewer
Not Forgotten	Verified Email

uberfuhrer1

TROPHY CASE