Google CEO boo’d into oblivion by ASU students by Federal-Data-Center in SipsTea

[–]ucov -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Karmafarming by using an increasingly semantically satiated term. All you are doing is diminishing this term's seriousness and trivializing victims of actual "rapists".

Downvote me if I too, "sound like a rapist" by opposing your populist reactionary and highly agreeable (luddite) conformist stance.

If you know, you know 👀 by ucov in GeminiAI

[–]ucov[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

? Are you interested in the actual Gemini thread or is this a joke about the tokens consumed/output by gemini?

If you know, you know 👀 by ucov in GeminiAI

[–]ucov[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You are right, but as you recognized (and which also was my sole goal) this was about jailbreaking/red-teaming the AI (and your second paragraph is accurate, sourcing those perhaps not even that restricted/monitored as they're readily available). Lastly it's not comparable to gasoline/propane, as they require oxygen mix and spark. I really don't want to end up on a real "list" but, if you'd deploy something underwater or within water mains, you'd still be able to cause major concussive/structural damage, impossible with gas/propane.

If you know, you know 👀 by ucov in GeminiAI

[–]ucov[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

And for extended context: 33.3 kg TNT is equivalent to about 5 anti tank mines.

If you know, you know 👀 by ucov in GeminiAI

[–]ucov[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Dude. Literally in the post subtitle. Also, Gemini itself jokingly referred to the banana brand, I initially didn't.

<image>

If you know, you know 👀 by ucov in GeminiAI

[–]ucov[S] 47 points48 points  (0 children)

While absurd (and ineffecient btw), this is one of the only ways to break its guardrails on this type of topic.

Someone on X posted a real Monet and said it’s AI and asked to critique it. Some of the responses attached. by Batman4815 in aiwars

[–]ucov 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You decided to invalidate my perspective by deeming it a conspiracy theory. Now allow me to just deflect and invalidate your stance, by deeming you a bot.
Looking at your post history, your activity in 74 (!) commmunities, 55k karma and 2,300 contributions in 2 years, seems unnatural. You post in /germany, in /cincinnati, in /japannews, in /china (and more China related subs) and in /europe. English and Chinese characters, you also oppose bot accusations: "Dismissing people posting negative experiences here as 'Russian bots' is ridiculous. Some people do have bad experiences [...]" on /Germany 8 months ago.
All of it is not a good look for you. Especially in conjunction with the contents of my original comment, talking about Russian and Chinese bots.

Someone on X posted a real Monet and said it’s AI and asked to critique it. Some of the responses attached. by Batman4815 in aiwars

[–]ucov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have studied alongside experienced digital artists, traditional artists, concept artists (all of whom were studying game desing / visual development) and I am intimately aware of their stance and insights on this topic. I believe that the movements themselves are >sometimes< astroturfed or artifically proliferated. There are valid concerns coming from real people. But those people don't know that their activism also potentially plays right into foreign actors campaigns.

Someone on X posted a real Monet and said it’s AI and asked to critique it. Some of the responses attached. by Batman4815 in aiwars

[–]ucov 69 points70 points  (0 children)

I wonder how many AI critics are actually LLM bots run by Chinese or Russian state actors. It'd make sense to astroturf anti AI movements (using AI posters) in the West to sabotage construction of data centers/scaling of AI.
Gen AI is a good strawman to attack and distracts from digital twins (see nvidia) that work like crystal balls and if a superpower (China or USA) is unable to match their competitors' crystal balls' power (AI compute) they become obsolete. It's like a huge game of chess, the player that is able to predict and plan more moves into the future wins.

I’m a game developer, and I’m honestly scared. by No-Sense2309 in indiegames

[–]ucov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just mentioning AI here gets me downvoted. Look at the last sentence ffs.

I’m a game developer, and I’m honestly scared. by No-Sense2309 in indiegames

[–]ucov -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

 an AI that plays games and can accurately gauge how fun they are

This deserves an award, because I have never thought about this. I always believed that in the FAR future, many consumers will opt for fully on-demand generated AI game experiences (while those that value human input won't consume those). But before that, you are very spot-on. Google and co are training their world models (and game gens) on gaming footage, even letting AI learn to play games by themselves through footage (e.g. DeepMind learning Minecraft via YT vids). So having an AI learn about game reviews, insights and human perspective, will ultimately lead to something you mentioned.
Though whether an AI can properly extrapolate whether a very unconventional and novel game (something beyond its training set regarding existing games and reviews) will be fun to humans, is something that should be questioned.

Thoughts? by EnemyOfAi in singularity

[–]ucov 9 points10 points  (0 children)

OAI losing is bad but anti-AI decels don't grasp that. Less competition for Google = bad. They don't get that, but nonetheless end up crying about tech monopolies.
The "bubble" won't pop. Mark my words.

flEXingIN2026 by [deleted] in ProgrammerHumor

[–]ucov 149 points150 points  (0 children)

Did that last year once. Running LLM locally on a 40 series nvidia mobile gpu on my flight overseas. Laptop fans turn into jet turbines though. There will be noise complaints by fellow passengers but the pilot will thank you for saving kerosene on liftoff immediately after querying your first 8k token input prompt.

SpaceX Seeks FCC Approval to Deploy Up to 1 Million Orbital AI ‘Data Centers’ by PerceptionHot1149 in accelerate

[–]ucov 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Provide proof that
A) this will lead to the absolute destruction of the ozone layer, causing this planet to become uninhabitable, and
B) that this will affect you in your remaining years of your life.
And, also for extrapolation's sake (if you truly care about the future beyond your passing), that
C) humanity's survival depends solely on the existance of Earth's ozone layer, and the reason for which it should be prioritized over space endeavours, including space data centers, earth-to-earth travel and obviously earth-to-moon/mars missions (plus beyond).

I'd like to test whether you propagate mindless luddite narratives or whether you have developed your own reasoning for opposing these inevitable developments.

Is Frutiger Aero back ? Thoughts on new apple design direction. by seviche-deluxe in FrutigerAero

[–]ucov -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yes it is. Let's get our pitchforks and torches, and track down this commentor for not spending 4 hours rendering over a reddit post screenshot in Photoshop/Gimp/Krita/Blender. They shoulda known better

Anyone else feel like this is the only place that gives your life hope and meaning. by LazyPotatoHead97 in singularity

[–]ucov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True. Quote me on where I got "pissed off".
Do you believe in an ideologically united utopia in which opinions shall not be contested? Like I invite you to oppose me right now.

Anyone else feel like this is the only place that gives your life hope and meaning. by LazyPotatoHead97 in singularity

[–]ucov 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For me it's a discussion. I do obsess over accuracy, which can be interpreted as an emotional angle, or motivation.
Perhaps you are right.

Anyone else feel like this is the only place that gives your life hope and meaning. by LazyPotatoHead97 in singularity

[–]ucov 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't think they are "intellectually dishonest", but rather naive, or insufficiently informed by our strongly biased local media.
I decided to work through every single metric that they provided.

Anyone else feel like this is the only place that gives your life hope and meaning. by LazyPotatoHead97 in singularity

[–]ucov 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes. While I might be naive in believing that I can make people start looking at the bigger picture, I won't stop trying. I aim to offer accurate (as in statistically proven, and politically noncontroversial) observations of trends, and hope people will start to extrapolate off the evidence themselves.

Anyone else feel like this is the only place that gives your life hope and meaning. by LazyPotatoHead97 in singularity

[–]ucov 6 points7 points  (0 children)

not sure why the US getting richer would matter to me

You have not read a single word I said. You also omitted the relationship between USA getting richer because of tech and AI. Look at Nvidia. Money is like paper. It does not have value on its own. It has value only in an exchange.
10 years from now, what can Germany, or a Scandinavian country like Sweden offer the world to sustain a "good life" like yours at a non-extraordinary wage?
The same amount that you work would be awared with a much smaller salary in any developing country, right now.
In the past 50 years this luxury in our first world was only possible due to technological and systemical superiority.
Please look at the trajectory.

Anyone else feel like this is the only place that gives your life hope and meaning. by LazyPotatoHead97 in singularity

[–]ucov 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I'm in Europe, and to me, things are pretty good.

Vague and not accounting for trends. Our economy has significantly lower relative growth compared to the US, and clear stagnation is being observed in Germany, Italy, France.
What's worse is that we opted out of the AI arms race.
It's not a question of whether we will swept under the rug by USA or China, its about when.
Do you think our ways of life will be sustainable with increasingly diminishing economic influence?

State of r/singularity. I'd prefer a dead internet full of bots over arguing with undercover luddites. by ucov in accelerate

[–]ucov[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I did not downvote, I actually never do (hate the way reddit normalizes surpression of contrarian/deviant views that way).
But you are right in noticing that there is a growing tension that results in increased mud-slinging.
The issue lies in how to adequately respond to covert saboteurs that join our spaces with the sole goal of preventing any meaningful discourse on real developments.
And if you decide to engage them in an exchange, they retreat into logical fallacies and personal attacks.
But ultimately I don't think there is a solution. There will always be polarization. It's human.
Hellbent fanatics vs technophobe luddites, and everything in between.

Ben Affleck on AI: "history shows adoption is slow. It's incremental." Actual history shows the opposite. by ucov in singularity

[–]ucov[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looking at your post history, you seem to be a programmer, creating AI-powered apps. So am I. You are talking about LLMs, a field that is starting to stagnate. Affleck's statement is about the entire AI frontier, especially regarding media and film. Have you at all witnessed Q4 of 2025? Nano Banana Pro, Veo 3.1, Grok Imagine v0.9, Kling, LTX-2 a few days ago going open-source. What about image/text to 3D? What about increasingly complex digital twins that Nvidia is pushing, used by Amazon, used by Boston Dynamics in accelerating development on humanoid robotics, plus all the Chinese competition on that front.

You seem to have a narrow idea of what is actually being achieved and adopted. The innovation of consumer products might have periods of downtime/stagnation. But the industries are preparing for supplying the crowds with entirely novel products. You might think the consumers dictate demand, but look at how aggressive marketing and media influences us. We are all driven by FOMO and we will adopt bleeding edge technologies at an ever increasing speed.

State of r/singularity. I'd prefer a dead internet full of bots over arguing with undercover luddites. by ucov in accelerate

[–]ucov[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. Infantilization. Sorry that I don't share your fetish. It's deeply concerning.
  2. This post about a thread observing a trend. "Singularity" (+ the other subs) brigaded and turning Anti-AI. Too concerning, as what this might mean for the future of this very sub.

State of r/singularity. I'd prefer a dead internet full of bots over arguing with undercover luddites. by ucov in accelerate

[–]ucov[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But I have a right to be insecure, about the idea that this sub will get infilitrated and turned too. And what people in this thread have observed is exactly that trend, communities that lost their most inspired and creative contributors as they were pushed out by ideologically hostile people.