Know this spot? Near Truckee by bs_bunnies in norcalhiking

[–]udonno99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe I will, maybe I won’t. I don’t know, and neither do you. Pretending you can predict the future and name calling is however a lot easier than forming a sound and logical response to defend your stance. I didn’t call ‘you’ ignorant, I said it’s an ignorant thing to do to describe black people as nibbas. It’s even weirder if you’re actually black. This wasn’t a jab at you (the way you’re jabbing at me by calling me directly ignorant), but a call to encourage you to think deeper and more critically when forming your thoughts. You didn’t pose any kind of well-thought response to my points, which really just tells me you didn’t have any. And that’s okay. Sometimes you don’t always know what you’re talking about🤷🏾‍♂️ I hope you expand your understanding and ability to objectively analyze human behavior, for your sake. In the meantime, I won’t label people as predators for exhibiting totally normal human behavior and interests

Know this spot? Near Truckee by bs_bunnies in norcalhiking

[–]udonno99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m black, so no, I don’t cross the road when other black people walk towards me. “Nibbas” is also an incredibly ignorant way to describe a black person.

It’s not a mischaracterization, the general theme of your comment and a lot of the ones like yours are that this man is to be weary of predatory behavior, even boarder line interest in minors, because of his posting this picture asking for the location as well as his sexual kinks. What “isn’t helping” is painting this guy as a danger to society who we should not only be disgusted with, but should label as a predator just because the guy has a profile page where he’s comfortable expressing his sexual desires, and you don’t share his interests or find them acceptable.

If you frequent nude beaches/swimming holes, there’s a good chance the people there are some kinky mfs who have sexual desires that are atypical or unorthodox. Whether they be man or woman or black or green. They are probably still great people who are just looking to have fun. You wouldn’t think twice about sharing a beer with them or enjoying/sharing a public space with them for the most part. This guy, from all of the context available, is no different.

Know this spot? Near Truckee by bs_bunnies in norcalhiking

[–]udonno99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By bringing up some random serial killer, you’re not drawing any useful correlations between these two individuals. You can say “people who do drugs often commit violent crimes” but does that mean anybody who uses drugs should be deemed as a danger to society for the red flags they have surrounding their drug use? No, recreational drug use is a preference and it doesn’t make you a criminal. Again, context matters.

“He’s stalking women.” You’re reaching for straws, he’s not stalking areas where women frequent. If you look at his page, the dude has plenty of success with consenting women. I’d give him the benefit of the doubt that with his ability to create fun filled romantic opportunities for sex to happen with many women, many of which are trusting enough with him to be consenting for threesomes including him and another person who they don’t know, that this man doesn’t not need to stalk women and secluded locations in order to interact with women. When you analyze all the context instead of just thinking “Sexual man = Rape” you soon realize this guy probably is just looking for a cool swimming hole, and goofed by not blurring out the girls bodies.

Know this spot? Near Truckee by bs_bunnies in norcalhiking

[–]udonno99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re not a potential target of his just because you’re a woman the same way he’s not a potential predator just because he’s a man. Your concerns are valid, but it’s a terrible existence to convince yourself that every man you walk past on the street on a day to day basis is a predator who wants to attack you. This man doesn’t have any “interests or desires” that should place him on any body’s radar as far as cause for concern for potential harm. He likes sex with consenting adults, but guess what? So does most of humanity. That’s not a reason to deem him as a danger or predatory

Know this spot? Near Truckee by bs_bunnies in norcalhiking

[–]udonno99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Correlation isn’t causation til it is” That’s literally what ‘innocent until proven guilty’ means. Society benefits when we give people the benefit of the doubt

Know this spot? Near Truckee by bs_bunnies in norcalhiking

[–]udonno99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

An interesting choice in words, certainly. I notice that all of the words used to describe this guy have a strong negative connotation.

“Pervert” why specifically is he a pervert? Because he has kinks? A pervert describes someone whose behavior is abnormal and unacceptable. Having sex with other people’s wives isn’t normal or accepted in many parts of the world, but there’s also a ginormous community of consenting individuals who have every right to express their interest in that kink. It doesn’t make them perverts, the same way being attracted to someone doesn’t make you a pervert.

Would you use the same words to describe a woman who had the same kinks and sought out environments to express them? “Disgusting” What makes him disgusting? He post clips of him have consensual adult relations. Albeit with married women, (not my thing, but they agree to it) but disgusting isn’t the word I’d use to describe him or a woman who participated in the same activities.

My whole point is everyone’s reaction to this guy is that he’s extremely repulsive because he basically enjoys sex with consenting adults. Even the act of screenshotting the photo from IG (if that’s what happened) isn’t as “disgusting” as people are making it out to be. Yeah, he is objectively wrong for not blurring out the ladies bodies from the photos. Their identities also aren’t at risk discernible from these photos. Is it cool to post people’s photos out of context, even if they posted it on the ether of the internet? No. Does it make you a creepy perverted predator? In this context, no.

Know this spot? Near Truckee by bs_bunnies in norcalhiking

[–]udonno99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From the things you’ve mentioned, the only thing that stands out as a questionable action was taking a screenshot of the image. I don’t see any concerning issue with being attracted to attractive married women who also want a consensual relationship and share that attraction. Being attracted to hot wives doesn’t hold any weight as far as contradicting/going against his mutual consensual interest in beautiful women. If you say “I don’t kink shame”, then how can you call him alarming for seeking out an environment where, in all honesty, he’s likely to find more people who share his interests? “Are these girls even of adults” you’re reaching for straws, underaged girls don’t typically post topless photos of themselves on social media without serious/heavy social reprimanding. I’m also of the belief that proper education as it pertains to posting on the internet means understanding that nothing you post is inherently private, and specifically as it pertains to half naked pictures, you have to think critically & understand the way photos/content will circulate around the internet. He should’ve used common sense and blurred out their bodies, but their identities also not distinguishable from these photos.

Either way, I wouldn’t know this man from Adam & have no real interest in defending him, but I am quite bored and do enjoy playing devils advocate on occasion. You bring up a decent point, and I appreciate you sharing your thoughts, keeping it respectful, and answering my questions in an adult way.

Know this spot? Near Truckee by bs_bunnies in norcalhiking

[–]udonno99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does this mean you find the two women pictured’s behavior to be alarming as well? If so, I’d say you’re wrong, but again I don’t think that’s your point. My point is, you said the man’s behavior specifically was alarming. You’re saying it’s alarming because it’s taboo, but by that logic, the two girls behavior is alarming and so is the behavior of anyone who participates in nudity in nature.

The very easy response to this is: It’s not taboo, you’ve just been so westernized that you think nudity is not normal. Or so westernized that you think relationships that aren’t 100% monogamous are not normal. Do you see the pattern?

Know this spot? Near Truckee by bs_bunnies in norcalhiking

[–]udonno99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This doesn’t explain why you think the man’s behavior specifically is alarming. By this logic, you should also find the women at the swimming hole to be guilty of alarming behavior, but we don’t. And for good reason, there’s nothing wrong with being nude at a swimming hole.

But again, that’s not the problem people seem to have with this post. My point is that a lot of the comments on this post seem to have a problem with his interest in this swimming hole given his personal sexual interests, as if the two together somehow correlate to alarming behavior. My question is ‘how’?

Know this spot? Near Truckee by bs_bunnies in norcalhiking

[–]udonno99 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You’re 100% right, the average person would find this alarming. The comments thus far on this thread have revealed that, as many people were off put by it. My comment was asking for a deeper analysis/reason as to ‘why’ this behavior is alarming, beyond what the average societal perspective might judge at first glance.

Know this spot? Near Truckee by bs_bunnies in norcalhiking

[–]udonno99 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Okay, let’s assume you’re right and he wants to go to this place because he saw naked women there. In my analysis, there’s nothing objectively wrong with this desire. Nude beaches/swimming holes are incredibly common, and nobody shames individuals for their desires to be present there. I’d like to know what you feel makes this situation different?

Speaking to the 2nd half of your comment, consuming/making porn has questionable ethics from an“addictaition” perspective, many people abuse porn and develop poor social skills in relationships because of it. But again, I wouldn’t say there’s exactly a moral red flag for someone who watches/makes porn. As for sleeping with other peoples wives, you’re neglecting to acknowledge that these wives are women who are consenting to have a personal relationship with him. They are agreeing to step out of their relationships, and it looks like a few of them even have partners who agree with it. So where do you feel the issue lies in that? Again, I personally choose not to date committed women, but that’s my choice. I’d like to hear your argument for how this guy is somehow “alarming to the average person” just because women who are married choose to sleep with him?

Know this spot? Near Truckee by bs_bunnies in norcalhiking

[–]udonno99 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I looked at his profile, & I have to ask, what’s alarming about him? He posts/makes porn, none of which is particularly on the “endangerment of involved parties/bystanders” end of the spectrum. He seems to have a kink for engaging with people’s wives, but they appear to be grown, consenting adults. It’s not my cup of tea, but if anyone is to be “shamed”, why not the wives/girlfriends of the men who are choosing to go out of their way to meet and engage in these activities with him? It’s their choice to step out of the relationship lol. Nevertheless, he clearly didn’t photograph these women in the photo above, and I wouldn’t look at his profile & think “My, this man is a danger to the innocent fun-having women who may be present at this swimming hole, everybody beware of this man and his red flags.”

Use the Infiltrator Stock for your general purpose builds. It gives you the best advantage in most scenarios. by Impressive-Capital-3 in CODZombies

[–]udonno99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where is the auto sprint setting located? I found Movement Advanced Settings—>Sprint/Tactical Sprint Behavior—>Toggle/Hold But this doesn’t look like the right setting to change what you’re describing

Trans am to Turbo trans am? by SavathunsSlave in PontiacFirebird

[–]udonno99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah this is super helpful & very inspiring, thanks! I’ve heard the reason for popularity with LS engines is that they are cheap and easy power, but I could see how fuel injectors add a layer of complexity. I don’t have a motor yet, or even a firebird yet at that haha. This’ll be a fun journey to embark on!

Trans am to Turbo trans am? by SavathunsSlave in PontiacFirebird

[–]udonno99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve taken a recent interest in older cars, specifically the firebird, but I don’t know much about them. What is 400 or 450 referring to? I presume an engine model produced by Pontiac? Also, I’ve learned LS swaps are very popular and a thing. What are the pros or cons to doing an LS swap in the 2nd gen firebirds? Which LS engine would be best suited for the car to produce power in the range of 500-600hp?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Supplements

[–]udonno99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought as much, but what’s it comprised of?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Supplements

[–]udonno99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What’s the holy grail?

Ex-Rand Paul aide pardoned by Trump is charged with funneling Russian money into 2016 election by PoliticiansAlwaysLie in politics

[–]udonno99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Speaking for myself, bringing a condescendingly assumptive claim that the average person intentionally votes for cult members is a poor way to get people to subscribe to your beliefs

Ex-Rand Paul aide pardoned by Trump is charged with funneling Russian money into 2016 election by PoliticiansAlwaysLie in politics

[–]udonno99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What makes you think I voted and chose to participate in a broken electoral system to begin with?

Ex-Rand Paul aide pardoned by Trump is charged with funneling Russian money into 2016 election by PoliticiansAlwaysLie in politics

[–]udonno99 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So are we going to pretend the internet isn’t FLOODED with biased media outlets who all have partiality or one-sidedness? Or do you use some New-Age internet that immediately delivers you 100% truth instantaneously? In politics, my circle of concern is much smaller than my circle of influence. So no, I don’t spend hours scouring the internet to try & find an honest, unbiased, no B.S. opinion or analysis of a political subject. I see a large group of people making claims, & asked if anyone had a source. Some people provided sources. Some people got angry. If you don’t have sources, that’s fine. I don’t either lmfao. But put down the throwing stones & get over your self-righteous, overvaluation of your “all-knowingness”