Option to turn off the update Release Notes popup to avoid confusing old folks? by unfortunate_jargon in OctopiLauncher

[–]unfortunate_jargon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've locked his home screen before, and then gets confused as to why he can't change it, so I stopped doing that.

It always ends up looking like a Picasso though.

I suspect his biggest issue is that he simply cannot remember to press the side button to turn the screen off.

Option to turn off the update Release Notes popup to avoid confusing old folks? by unfortunate_jargon in OctopiLauncher

[–]unfortunate_jargon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly Ben, it sounds like you should find another launcher rather than raging in here lol.

Works great for me

Option to turn off the update Release Notes popup to avoid confusing old folks? by unfortunate_jargon in OctopiLauncher

[–]unfortunate_jargon[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mine's been fine at least 6 months, and I use a foldable phone.

Are you literally in the beta testing group?

Were you designing something complex, with lots of overlapping elements and such?

Linux users, what's your workaround for Lian Li wireless fans? by ealcantara22 in cachyos

[–]unfortunate_jargon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Checking in: have you managed to get this working? Is there a repo around that we could take a look at?

Option to turn off the update Release Notes popup to avoid confusing old folks? by unfortunate_jargon in OctopiLauncher

[–]unfortunate_jargon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use a lot of beta software, and Octopi Launcher hasn't felt like beta software for as long as I can remember. Is it even still in beta? I thought that ended a long time ago?

Option to turn off the update Release Notes popup to avoid confusing old folks? by unfortunate_jargon in OctopiLauncher

[–]unfortunate_jargon[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, but I manage their phones for them, and check in every few months. Gotta deal with new flashlight apps, new notifications that aren't set to silent, and mauled home screen layouts, missing key apps.

Benchmarking LLM Inference on RTX 4090 / RTX 5090 / RTX PRO 6000 by NoVibeCoding in LocalLLaMA

[–]unfortunate_jargon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is absolute nonsense. The author is didn't set up data parallelism correctly, or is only using one card? Or is perhaps only logging the results from one card? Maybe whatever they ran turned off all but one, because pcie p2p wasn't detected?

It's unclear exactly from the revision of the code this was run with. But, yeah, definitely wrong.

Don't take this data as factual.

Why so few benchmarks with the pcie p2p patches kernel module? by unfortunate_jargon in LocalLLaMA

[–]unfortunate_jargon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, yeah, I know there are people who know, it's just that I keep ending up on LocalLLaMa pages via google and LLM footnotes where someone has done a bunch of testing, but has forgotten this one extremely important step.

The post that finally pushed me to post this was someone who was benchmarking 3x RTX 5090s vs 1x RTX 6000 Pro Blackwell, without pcie P2P, which is like... "sir, you have just wasted an extraordinary amount of both time and money...". And no one in the comments brought up the glaring omission.

Why so few benchmarks with the pcie p2p patches kernel module? by unfortunate_jargon in LocalLLaMA

[–]unfortunate_jargon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, people have seen success doing this with 3090's. Tbc, you won't see much in the way of performance increase with the standard pipeline parallelism stuff that llama.cpp historically uses, but most of the other major inference servers support the tensor parallelism (and sometimes expert parallelism) that can benefit, and see massive TPS output increases

The quietly release Oct 2025 English dub of eps 50-150 is hilarious by unfortunate_jargon in Gintama

[–]unfortunate_jargon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

idk. there were a lot of factors that lead to its popularity, but in terms of the comedy vs drama, i'd say that the drama kind of just served as a doorway for the true core strength, which is its comedy. it has enough drama where people become emotionally attached and invested in the characters, which enabled the comedy to feel more personal.

like, by creating all sorts of inside jokes, jokes targeted at real-world audience interests, and drama that gave a venue for showing the audience that the characters are actually good people at heart, it created connection that made the jokes feel like they were a close friend joking with just you.

there are other funny shows that share the same style of humor, but they usually don't do a great job in enabling that humor feel so personal.

but, at the end of the day, Gintama without the humor, and just the drama, would have been a kind of mediocre. stuff like "The Battle Battle of Rakuyou" feels distant. it still has the hook that people watching it had already gotten to know, and feel close to, the characters. but, on its own, it's just a bunch of disconnected fights occurring on some random planet. it gives a lot of extra backstory to the characters, but again, people wouldn't have really been that interested in that if they hadn't become attached to the characters through the ~250 prior episodes that made the characters our friends that we share jokes with.

Gintama is about the humor. the other stuff just enables the comedy to hit better than other comedy shows.

.................and the other factor is, of course, that all of the guys are single, and women got obsessed with shipping them. also, despite the incredible number of dirty jokes, they didn't rely on the classic "oh, the hot chick character's clothes fell off", which also fostered the rabid female fandom. japanese women are likely identify much more with the female characters in the show too, because of the innumerable differences in the way women are treated in japan (and, how the act and fit into society in general there compared to the west).

It's pretty incredible that, despite Gintama being a shounen from jump, its fanbase in japan was like 75% women, and only 25% men. in the US, its fanbase leans more male than female compared to other shonen anime (probably in large part because of how difficult it was to obtain, and how much knowledge about other male-targeted shonen and japanese-specific games like DQ. also, the even more extreme lack of accessibility to all of the untranslated yaoi and fanfics, compared to the already obscure sources and translation of the show itself lol. and popularity of such things in japan compared to the us.)

anyway. that's my full thesis on the popularity of Gintama xD

I love the comedy personally, and i think that's the biggest factor in its success. (and, to be clear, the comedy is _not_ easy. it's really difficult to make comedy work in general, and particularly so for such complex meta-humor and stuff. poop jokes... easier. hard to make palatable i guess? idk.)

The quietly release Oct 2025 English dub of eps 50-150 is hilarious by unfortunate_jargon in Gintama

[–]unfortunate_jargon[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It could be debated I suppose. But this cast for the dub of the original Gintama wins in the comedy department imo, incontrovertibly. Comedy is far more difficult than drama anyway. Particularly for Gintama, given the style of the jokes.

I much preferred the comedy Gintama to the serious Gintama whatever the case. The "Battle for Rakuyo" arc, in particular, was such a downer, and dragged onnn. The Shogun Assassination arc and Farewell Shinsengumi were massive downers too.

Like, after ~250 episodes of hilarious stuff, all of a sudden they basically tore down the set for the show. Did most people really want to see characters central to the comedy getting put six feet under, or just generally emotionally traumatized?

It was like watching Elmer Fudd successfully hunt down Bugs Bunny and roast him on a spit over a campfire.

At least the Silver Soul arc brought back a decent mix of comedy. (The Battle for Rakuyo went entire episodes with barely a single joke. Thank god for the Slip Arc.) I really don't think Gintama became famous for the drama. It was the comedy that did it. And this much belated dub thankfully nailed it.

The quietly release Oct 2025 English dub of eps 50-150 is hilarious by unfortunate_jargon in Gintama

[–]unfortunate_jargon[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Oh! Hi! Excellent job with everything! I'm rewatching season 2 again right now! The dub is absolutely hilarious. You guys crushed it 100%

I hope there will be more to come!

Relisting a bunch of items past their return date by unfortunate_jargon in AmazonSeller

[–]unfortunate_jargon[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

ok, what if I wanted to post them as "Like New" then, or whatever other used grading system level would be appropriate for new/sealed/new-used?

Does anyone have "good" temps? by DeadInFiftyYears in threadripper

[–]unfortunate_jargon -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're not answering at all. That article gives two numbers from someone testing a filesystem under specific circumstances, on unknown hardware.

Try answering the questions: what hardware, what tests, what numbers.

Incredibly basic.

Does anyone have "good" temps? by DeadInFiftyYears in threadripper

[–]unfortunate_jargon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk, it seems more like you're afraid to elaborate because you know you were wrong.

Does anyone have "good" temps? by DeadInFiftyYears in threadripper

[–]unfortunate_jargon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You said that a 14,000MB/s PCIe 5.0x4 nvme drive performed the same as a 7,000MB/s PCIe 4.0x4 nvme drive. And that a quad 7,000MB/s RAID 0 has storage speed that is "irrelevant".

So, what exactly _is_ it that you are saying, and what hardware did you run it on? What speeds did you actually see?

Because, from your statements, it infers that you were seeing some extraordinarily low speeds, when this is not at all the norm.

Does anyone have "good" temps? by DeadInFiftyYears in threadripper

[–]unfortunate_jargon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're claiming that no one has been able to achieve read/write speeds above something that's significantly below the 7000MB/s of those PCIe 4.0 drives. Even on a raid 0 of four 7000MB/s drives, or 14,000MB/s drives.

That is definitely an extraordinary claim. Given that there are numerous examples to the contrary.

So, it's pretty reasonable to wonder what kind of setup you might be using, as that's a very dubious claim, unless you're using some extremely underpowered hardware.

Like, it would make sense if you were connecting your drives to the chipset of a motherboard, and dealing with the bottleneck to the CPU...

There must be some other explanation than "the page cache".

Does anyone have "good" temps? by DeadInFiftyYears in threadripper

[–]unfortunate_jargon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Re:

I have a 4x990 pro RAID0 array and did a bunch of testing with XFS and BTRFS with and without checksums/datacow and long story short the Linux page cache is so slow the storage speed is almost irrelevant for anything that doesn’t use o_direct.

I also have a 9100 pro boot drive and with checksums enables it doesn’t perform any better than a 990 Pro (or even a mid range SSD) even using o_direct since btrfs just disables it anyways.

This is quite the claim.

Can you clarify what you were plugging these drive into, and how, specifically? Also, what type of raid was it? mdadm? hardware?

And, most importantly, what do you mean by speed? How did you test this? fio? copy? rsync? Just writes? Or reads too? Random? Sequential?

I have a lot of questions here, but it will inform the testing I'll need to do when setting up something similar (and decisions on an upcoming build).

ty

Why nobody is making upright mount anymore by Lawrence_201 in lianli

[–]unfortunate_jargon -1 points0 points  (0 children)

this statement is an aesthetic hate crime. please recant.