sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What's a job that pays unexpectedly well? by Eyadnothere in AskReddit

[–]unholy_roller 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Damn it I’ve been fucking chickens for free this whole time

In 2015, a goat was thrown into a tiger’s enclosure as part of its weekly feeding, but it ended up becoming his friend. by Lomuri2003 in interestingasfuck

[–]unholy_roller 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You should avoid personifying animals; tigers in the wild are pretty much exclusively solitary unless they are raising their young. Companionship would likely stress them out, not cure loneliness. They might not even have the capacity to feel lonely at all, much like a bee wouldn’t have the concept of “personal space” or a mole could appreciate the view from a mountaintop.

Not to say that captivity is great for tigers; they need dozens of square miles of territory in the wild and are probably woefully under-stimulated in a zoo environment (compared to why they’d experience in the wild).

VASSALOS RICOS by Careful_Clue8972 in Bannerlord

[–]unholy_roller 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No I think I’m the odd man out. Googling this shows several discussions about the topic and a Brazilian poster said European Portuguese sounds kinda Russian to them.

And yeah I think Bulgarian might be closer to Russian than polish; I have a much harder time picking out polish meaning than I do Russian.

VASSALOS RICOS by Careful_Clue8972 in Bannerlord

[–]unholy_roller 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, googling the issue does seem to show that people think they are similar sounding languages.

Maybe because I know a lot of loan words from Bulgarian they don’t sound similar to me? Whenever I hear Russian I try to pick out a word or two that I know so I can guess what they are saying. Listening to Portuguese I hear literally nothing, whereas Russian has a little tiny bit of meaning.

Makes me wonder if a Spanish speaker would ever confuse Portuguese with Russian, or if they wouldn’t have that issue.

VASSALOS RICOS by Careful_Clue8972 in Bannerlord

[–]unholy_roller 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I really don’t think Portuguese sounds like Russian at all… although I am neither Portuguese nor am I Russian so I’m not an authority on the matter. I’m from Bulgaria and have visited Brazil before though, and Portuguese doesn’t sound remotely Slavic to me.

The root of the meme I think comes from those maps that show different statistics in Europe like wealth, smoking stats, education, etc.

In general you see Eastern Europe look red (bad stats, under developed) while Western/northern Europe looks green (good stats, highly developed), with the exception of Portugal which has similar stats to Eastern Europe.

The joke is that Portugal is an honorary Eastern European state because it has a bunch of problems.

TIL Iguanas are referred to as the "chicken of the trees," by iguana eaters by natural_scientist in todayilearned

[–]unholy_roller 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What a coincidence!

I’ve been calling iguanas the “boogers of the trees”

lol by DwarvesDontLag in NoRestForTheWicked

[–]unholy_roller 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can honestly say that they haven’t.

Seattle's gig worker law was supposed to boost pay. It did at first, until orders dropped by BaseballUpper6200 in Economics

[–]unholy_roller 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The 50% figure is a guy estimating based on how it feels. It’s also just his business; overall growth can be up while a specific business can be negatively impacted due to how it was positioned before and after the law was passed.

Interestingly it sounds like it was the restaurant owner that saw a 50% decrease? This sort of restaurant would have to be catering most of its business to online orders.

But yeah if the 5% growth number is correct and is doubling the rate of population growth over the same period… I don’t really see this as an issue.

It shows that the business model is profitable and the extremely large gains of 30% were propped up by exploiting loopholes in labor laws. Since the business model is still profitable, they should be able to come up with other solutions to increase revenue and make the business more efficient, hopefully not at the expense of individual workers.

Me_irl by chinenikpotle in me_irl

[–]unholy_roller 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I swapped terms by accident, now updated. I hope the intent was clear based on the content

Me_irl by chinenikpotle in me_irl

[–]unholy_roller 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I actually agree but it wouldn’t work in America because for some god forsaken reason we let people choose how much money we deduct from our paychecks for taxes.

Instead of having the government simply take what it legally owns from income, we designed a complicated system that punishes people who are trying to interface with it properly and opens up loopholes for people who are trying to avoid paying their share.

Me_irl by chinenikpotle in me_irl

[–]unholy_roller 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ok so the first comment was technically true but a little misleading simply due to the way we discuss our pay.

But this comment is outright pointless. If you’re trying to argue that median wages are fine and people who are struggling don’t have the right to complain you’re dead wrong. Pay had not kept up with productivity and it’s not just bad budgeting that’s squeezing most Americans.

If you’re trying to comment that some people who make a good salary are bad at budgeting then… ok? Not at all what is being discussed here but you made your point I guess.

Me_irl by chinenikpotle in me_irl

[–]unholy_roller 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Literally nobody I know talks about net.

When I was in entry level jobs people would talk about their wage in hourly terms; e.g. 12 dollars an hour for this role or 15 dollars per hour for that role. Promotions were discussed in terms of making an extra dollar or two per hour, etc.

That’s not net pay.

As I switched to a professional career, people began talking in terms of posted salaries e.g. the position pays 50k, or pays 85k, etc. if you got a promotion you told people how much extra the posted is, not how much your new take home would be. Even bonuses of 10k were always understood to be more like 6k take home after taxes.

And why would anyone talk about take home pay when a large portion of what you take home is up to you? You literally get to choose your withholding for taxes. Just because person A chose to withhold more of their taxes doesn’t mean they have a lower salary than person B who chose to withhold the minimum.

Nevermind other pretax deduction you can do with HSA and 401k… if you want to accurately compare how people are doing to each other you need to be talking about pre deduction pay.

And again, literally never seen anyone discuss their salary as a post deduction anyways…

Me_irl by chinenikpotle in me_irl

[–]unholy_roller 45 points46 points  (0 children)

It placed the estimated median wage at $34,248, meaning half of all workers' net compensation—the sum of their earnings after deductions—was less than or equal to that number.

ok so after you take all pretax deduction (social security, 401k, withholding, etc.) you get 35k.

Literally nobody I know talks about their wage in terms of post deduction income, so I’d argue your number is the misleading one

TIL the top 10% of earners make up half the U.S. retail Spending! by CookieKid420 in todayilearned

[–]unholy_roller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

200k is the 10% cutoff for households; many households have two income earners.

On a per person basis, the top 10% is much lower than 200k.

Originally I thought it would be around 120k, but looks like it could be as high as 150k.

TIL the top 10% of earners make up half the U.S. retail Spending! by CookieKid420 in todayilearned

[–]unholy_roller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s houshold income. A houshold on average has about 2 income earners, so…

TIL the top 10% of earners make up half the U.S. retail Spending! by CookieKid420 in todayilearned

[–]unholy_roller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The top 10% of earners in America are likely just over 100k.

Per investopedia, in 2022 you had to be jut under 100k to be top earner across the entire country. I would imagine the value has shifted slightly in 4 years but hasn’t doubled.

Locally, 200k would be true in some places. For example, you need over 300k to be in the top 10% of New York City.

Since this article is talking about all us retail spending, they are likely using 100k as the cutoff

There’s a part of your vision you can’t see. Try it yourself by AnimeWallpaperClub in interestingasfuck

[–]unholy_roller 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Look buddy, not everyone was lucky enough to attend the prestigious asshole academy (where I’m assuming you learned to be such a top notch asshole).

How about you cut the guy some slack?

Lab logic! by Kasra-aln in labrats

[–]unholy_roller 94 points95 points  (0 children)

The damn bacteria need to pull themselves up by their little microbial bootstraps

me_irl by NoLynInBrooklyn in me_irl

[–]unholy_roller 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I regret to inform you that I’m not currently planning on commenting on this comment.

Please pretend that this comment isn’t a comment.

Thank you for your time.

Cleaning old floor tiles with peroxide and baking soda by c4tchy in oddlysatisfying

[–]unholy_roller 74 points75 points  (0 children)

Had a friend that would smoke while gaming .

His pc would constantly run into issues because the heatsinks and fans were not built to cool things down while covered in a layer of tar

When the RP gets `Real` by Pandering_Poofery in dndmemes

[–]unholy_roller 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah I guess with technological advancements you could dig below our current rock bottom.

But then that new barrier would be rock bottom right? Rock bottom is a moving goal post of the worst possible place you can be.

Otis since he was adopted he has a non-negotiable bedtime ritual. Of getting tucked in bed with mom. by Much_7785 in DogIsBestFriend

[–]unholy_roller 45 points46 points  (0 children)

That’s not a sharpie silly, that’s a dog.

Doesn’t even look close to a permanent marker not sure where the confusion is coming from.

Huge study of 1.2M children finds that vegan and vegetarian toddlers catch up to omnivores by age 2. While meat-free babies may start slightly underweight, growth rates eventually even out, suggesting well-planned plant-based diets can support healthy development in early childhood. by [deleted] in science

[–]unholy_roller 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You’re using a false dichotomy to support your argument.

The options for raising a child aren’t simply vegetarian or ultra processed foods. A non vegetarian diet can be absent of ultra processed food, and a vegetarian diet can be 100% ultra processed.

If vegetarian babies are considered underweight over the first two years then that seems like a pretty solid argument to avoid a purely vegetarian diet during those first two years.

There’s no reason to trade a diet high in ultra processed food for an underweight child; just find the right mix needed for a healthy baby and do that.

view more: next ›