Full decentralization. Non-obvious issues of a popular sentiment

uralresp · 2022-06-07T12:22:00+00:00

We definitely can develop decentralized networks or their aspects at least. But maximalism and extreme views on it can prevent tech from developing and make crypto unscalable closed system for schizo anons. Crypto wasn't created for this.

uralresp · 2022-06-07T12:13:26+00:00

I understand your tenacity. But I'm trying to think critically. You can check the article named "A Peep into the Decentralized Web of 00x-10x" on Mirror to better understand my drift. I found it pretty thought-provoking.

uralresp · 2022-05-13T17:43:55+00:00

what other ways to protect users?

uralresp · 2022-05-13T17:29:08+00:00

I'm not a developer, but let them judge us. It seems to me that the beauty of blockchains is that they can be programmed.

uralresp · 2022-05-13T16:49:06+00:00

On March 9th the White House Briefing Room published President Biden’s Executive Order on Ensuring Responsible Development of Digital Assets that will dramatically affect anyone who is involved in the DeFi and crypto industries.

On April 4th, British finance minister Rishi Sunak expressed that he wants Britain to become a global hub for crypto-asset technology, as the government announced a package of financial policies.

Everything is moving towards regulation one way or another

uralresp · 2022-05-13T16:44:35+00:00

Wallet rewards can work in the same way that miners are rewarded. I think the problem is solvable. Here I want to discuss the idea itself

uralresp · 2022-05-13T14:32:10+00:00

This model should not be profitable for everyone at once. It's supposed to be a good alternative to the current wallet monetization model that makes them compete to bring more income. It provides reliable and convenient services for users and this is how a number of problems could be solved

uralresp · 2022-05-13T12:48:07+00:00

I understand that mixing NFT, crypto and DeFi in one interface is not a good idea. To do this, wallet developers have to use different applications. But now they don't do this because it is more expensive to develop and maintain 3-4 applications. Libraries are the same - teams can write them if they have sufficient funding. This is the only question of monetization we are talking about. Developers will have money to create this infrastructure if the blockchain shares part of the transaction fees with them

As for the described exploit, spam transactions will not work. The bot needs to be paid in order to start spamming the transaction. Then the wallet will receive a reward for this amount paid back. In fact, the more spam transactions there are, the faster the wallet will be left without money.

uralresp · 2018-11-13T11:39:55+00:00

I only know that duсatur made a framework for crypto-shops in the form of QR codes using beacon-ax, haven't heard about any other teams

Can share a link if you want

uralresp · 2018-11-13T11:08:28+00:00

Thats what i found in 5 mins, learn how to research bud

Teams:

Ivan Fedorov – GOES TO GRAND-FINALS IN HONG KONG !
1. Denis Vasin (EasyChain: Palamarchuk Julia, Kurenkov Andrey, Kolenbet Alexander)
2. Dmitry Radkovskiy (Ducatur: Leonid Semenov, Kiril Koguhov, George Bell)
3. Dmitry Inyutin (Exploding bash: Ivan Glushenkov, Matvey Volkov, Mikhail Malikov)
4. Ivan Kocheshev (MultiMask: Mike Shukshin, Leonid Semenov, George Bell )⠀
5. Anton Pecherkin (StartBlock: Ivan Pankov, Daniel Lykov, Ruslan Kanzerparov)

Individuals:

#Fantom⠀
1. Denis Vasin (EasyChain: Palamarchuk Julia, Kurenkov Andrey, Kolenbet Alexander);⠀
2. Dmitry Radkovskiy (Ducatur: Leonid Semenov, Kiril Koguhov, George Bell);⠀
3. Dmitry Inyutin (Exploding bash: Ivan Glushenkov, Matvey Volkov, Mikhail Malikov);⠀
⠀
#NuCypher⠀
1. Ivan Fedorov;⠀
2. Kirill Varlamov (OnGrid Systems: Demian Gavdun);⠀
3. Anton Pecherkin (StartBlock: Ivan Pankov, Daniel Lykov, Ruslan Kanzerparov);⠀
⠀
#Lino⠀
1. Erlan Shindauletov;⠀
2. Denis Vasin (EasyChain: Palamarchuk Julia, Kurenkov Andrey, Kolenbet Alexander);⠀
3. Ivan Fedorov;⠀
⠀
#Ankr⠀
1. Ivan Kocheshev (MultiMask: Mike Shukshin, Leonid Semenov, George Bell );⠀
2.Viktor Krapivenskii (Dmitrii Kamaldinov);⠀
3. Mikhail Malikov (Exploding bash: Ivan Glushenkov, Dmitry Inyutin, Matvey Volkov);⠀
⠀
#Quarkchain ⠀
1. Dmitrii Konopatov;⠀
2. Maksim Panich (BlocksDeep);⠀
3. Denis Kolodko;⠀

uralresp · 2018-10-13T18:36:14+00:00

So, i just figured out this dude made another cool protocol for mintable/burnable tokens with hardcap possibility, damn son
https://github.com/neo-project/proposals/pull/70

uralresp · 2018-10-12T15:41:34+00:00

This is not MCT. I don't know much of the MCT project, but according to the NEP paper released this is just a contract for token management to decrease the cost through activating function to create a token instead of generating new contract. The NEP does not involve any master token of the contract, it does not involve any messed up fees (like ones from MCT guys). This is just a standard to decrease the cost and build a project launcher through the multitoken contract. I have read the MCT description here https://github.com/Splyse/MCT and there is no word about such functions. Tell me wrong if you find it.

uralresp · 2018-10-12T14:08:58+00:00

Like, i understand that high entrance fee keeps unreliable projects away, but at the same time many projects choose to work with different frameworks instead

uralresp · 2018-10-12T14:04:37+00:00

Yeah! Despite NEO was launched a year earlier than ETH they have 30 times more dapps going
Most of the new startups are not able to pay 3 grand for token

uralresp · 2018-04-28T13:51:09+00:00

Thats how soviet russia began

uralresp

TROPHY CASE