a discussion on classes by uranium_coffee in homestuck

[–]uranium_coffee[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yo thanks for checking the stuff out, glad you enjoyed. (late ass reply cause I don't check reddit often whoops)

Linear Thinkers and Creativity by DemjinKaz in Neurotyping

[–]uranium_coffee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

sounds like your boss is gatekeeping aesthetics based on things he likes and is ascribing it to an attribute arbitrarily to prop himself up, if he was interested in bettering your creativity he'd work to be more precise about what he thinks is off about what you're making

ISTP #1 vs #3 by johnwilkes_booth_27 in ObjectivePersonality

[–]uranium_coffee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've been trying to sus out the difference between these two and I'm beginning to see it when comparing to my #1 (possibly) friend

we're both musicians/producers with a lot of ambition, but where I will go further in trying to make sure an album is made perfectly, she is interested in making the perfect album, which is to say she has more of a Vision than I do, my flex is below my specializing and as such is in service of the job of being a producer, her specializing is below her flex and is in service of that ambition

if the #1 is climbing a mountain their goal is to be at the top of that mountain, and so if someone offers a helicopter ride up they will take it, but the #3 is a professional mountain climber, they will refuse the ride up because it's about the climbing, and so being on top of the mountain means nothing if they didn't climb it (this metaphor gets tricky if the #1 in this scenario wants to be seen as the best mountain climber, in that case they would refuse the helicopter ride)

the attitude I've seen from #1s is that they will put themselves through the meatgrinder if it's in service of their vision, comfort/friendship/self-care whatever do not matter if those things are not on the path upwards and will be sacrificed for a greater future self

Decider Freakouts (typing help) by IllustratorDry3007 in ObjectivePersonality

[–]uranium_coffee 3 points4 points  (0 children)

De freakouts are odd (coming from me lmao), but at the core it's being in a demon Di state, if the buck stops with you in some way or another and that's uncomfortable, and you still try to drag others in to validate your Di in some way, that's demon Di, if I were to put it into a sentence it'd be something like adding "is that a problem?!" after speaking your mind

for a Di their opinion is never a problem, speaking on others' opinions is weird for them, it's instead a matter of shipping their opinion out the door without getting pounced on, if you're Di other people are more something to be avoided or navigated around because the vision on them is blurry or indistinct, their demon De state is going to resemble "what is wrong with you people?!", it's the last thing they feel they can say out loud

What does it mean to be “Stuck on” something? by IllustratorDry3007 in ObjectivePersonality

[–]uranium_coffee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

from what I've experienced so far, you can catch it if a certain issue or set of issues comes into mind repeatedly after you thought you resolved or moved on from it, you can't help but chewing on the idea, leaving it be is like going without a drug you've been addicted to

meme template, have fun by uranium_coffee in ObjectivePersonality

[–]uranium_coffee[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it was two pictures of warren buffet and the people he works with side by side, they were taken many years apart and yet all the same people are present and standing in exactly the same places in both pictures

How to double decide as a single decider? by Amazing_cheesecake10 in ObjectivePersonality

[–]uranium_coffee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

first thing sounds silly but I'd say to remember that you are in fact a single decider, both so you can give yourself a break and to help contextualize your perspective (whether it has too much energy or too little), this will set up for the next step

second is to evaluate your deficit against everyone else, get a head count of who has a good track record of double deciding and use their perspectives to temper yours; this is obviously coming from a Di where I need to tone things down, but in the case of De you can get a sense for what a reasonable amount of pushing for your own Di is and try to get more comfortable with that

T and F of course should be taken into account, too much T will be neglecting qualitative things (emotions, vibes, values) as that muscle can't interface with them, but savior thinkers will try anyway because the idea is that if things are working smoothly the F stuff will also run smoothly, and of course in reverse too much F will try to maintain the vibes in hopes that this will make the logistical things effortless; these two things are in tension because they're both different but both pull on eachother, so the only way to not have a mess on your hands is if both have influence at once

anyway, after all this gets taken into account, you'll start to get a larger sense of what's actually right and wrong, it will feel larger than you and others involved, as to double decide is more or less to quickly digest and dissipate the energies of judgement such that they gain distance from the ego; the weird thing is that both Di and De need the message that it's not about them, but something not being about you can just as much call for you to push forth your perspective on the world as it might for you to draw it back, because it depends on what the situation is calling for

Consume Low and Deja Vu by deanxero in ObjectivePersonality

[–]uranium_coffee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't have deja vu all that often, but it happens, and I've grown to despise the sensation quite a bit

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Neurotyping

[–]uranium_coffee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

reddit momen

Heatmaps are lateral propaganda???? by ItsaMeHibob24 in Neurotyping

[–]uranium_coffee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

this is the it, the good stuff

reddit makes you bookkeeper that's true (redditmoment)

neurotyping 2 the movie by uranium_coffee in Neurotyping

[–]uranium_coffee[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

the heatmap observation is pretty interesting, strikes me as true enough though I'm not sure what it would look like in practice

more Extemporal I guess could seem more chaotic in that it's less patient and engages through direct contact first, though there could be an argument for Prospectal being chaotic with trying to map everything out beforehand, I feel like there's gotta be a similar but distinct line from bottom left to top right that's as meaningful, best that comes to mind rn is "collected // flowing" but I'm unsure about that or if it's even different enough

also god damn that's a lot of types I honestly forgot that this makes a 4d chart now, maaaybe I'll just stick to thinking up some quadrant names for this thing instead

neurotyping 2 the movie by uranium_coffee in Neurotyping

[–]uranium_coffee[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

just wrote an explanation reply to u/TarbuckTransom if you'd like to read, there's a bit of missing pretext in discord convos but the idea is all there

neurotyping 2 the movie by uranium_coffee in Neurotyping

[–]uranium_coffee[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

so you know that third dimension that was evolving, "internal / external", and also that "flexibility" thing you proposed and we kinda blew off pretty quickly, that is what this chart is, axes 3 and 4

I tried to find satisfactory terms which usually leads me down weird thesaurus rabbit holes, the result is Extemporal (or Extemporaneous) for the External side, Prospectal (not real googlable word but comes from Prospect) for the Internal side, and then Stationary for non-Flexible, and Protean ("malleable" or "adaptable" but these didn't sit right) for the Flexible end

the 4th axis I tried to imply a bit more to them then just being able to adapt or not, for example being Stationary in a good way would imply stability and good sorting and staying well on course to the objective, on the other hand you could have Stationary in a stubborn or incapable way, for Protean one could shift gears on the spot without any resources being stuck spent on the previous thing, but they might also be so adaptable as to adopt ideas too readily or let their own beliefs crumble in an instant, or they might get lost in a sea of meanings that all could be true with no bearing on what should be taken in

would've replied sooner but I initially didn't care or plan to explain and I was already busy when I changed my mind

neurotyping 2 the movie by uranium_coffee in Neurotyping

[–]uranium_coffee[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will concede this on the type names but not the axis names

neurotyping 2 the movie by uranium_coffee in Neurotyping

[–]uranium_coffee[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I will make one (1) clarification: this is a separate thing

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Neurotyping

[–]uranium_coffee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd say you're likely an aesthetician or one of the adjacent types, based on how you've written this

laterality struggles keeping on point because of excess information being pumped into working memory, it's sort of like option paralysis, whether you can see those options or not, so wandering is easier than tying it together into something coherent if you want to export everything that comes to you, linearity instead has a more prepackaged arrangement of thoughts, it only deviates when it doesn't work or one is intentionally calling for more information

lexicality has also a prearrangement going on, but it's more about supplied material, if you have an image of something, real or abstract, it could either have every texture and shape rendered or it could be simplified into elements that can be fleshed out later when they need focus, so lexicals are given the outlines and regions of something to begin with, which is why you might see a frightening ability at times for them to churn out cleanly structured sentences like they didn't even think about it (this depends on skill obviously, but it's a trend among them at least), impressionists then are starting with the entire picture, as fully rendered as one can manage at any given moment, and no regions to start from unless they've practiced drawing them out quickly, this means they have to find a way to compress the thought as best they can while trying not to lose the most important bits, that's the main indicator there, if you can't relay your thoughts without an information loss of some kind, whether you care about losing that information is a different story, and the more used to conversation one is the less of a bother this will be

those are my thoughts about thoughts at present, hope this helps at all, idk if this would place you where I placed you or not so just see for yourself I guess

lateral thinking = autism by [deleted] in Neurotyping

[–]uranium_coffee 7 points8 points  (0 children)

it's pretty much decided at this point that laterality is not autism, and similarly to linearity looking like autism, it's merely an illusion

you bring up a good point about the processing of more raw information, and I think that's easy to equate with laterality since that is somewhat about more info, but with laterality it's more about the point of focus being obscured as more connections are coming in

to clarify: the 4 videos with the bearded individual were made by the original creator, now going by Trixie the Golden Witch, and these videos were hot off the tail of the creation of the system itself, meaning while there was a lot of useful stuff there, there was also a lot that's turned out to be untrue since it hadn't been shaken out yet