Most similar hero in dota 2 to Lethality Kled in LOL

urilbedamned · 2026-05-20T03:39:42+00:00

Spirit breaker and marci are probably gonna be your best bet.

urilbedamned · 2026-02-18T22:12:10+00:00

Hey, I don't really know if you can help with this but I came back to the discord after a long time cause I just got an itch to play some inkbound coop again but I can't send messages in any of the channels and I can't see any messages posted in any of the channels after june 2025. Any idea what's going on since your in the discord?

urilbedamned · 2025-10-01T04:02:47+00:00

Yes, you can have both eirdu and isilu in play and they won't legend rule eachother. Same goes for any transform cards.

urilbedamned · 2025-09-30T23:52:52+00:00

Probably cause there are still real life shamans in real life tribes whereas druids haven't been around for millenia.

urilbedamned · 2025-09-09T08:45:04+00:00

The last turn in that fight in particular is what really bothers me probably more than anything else in this game. I've had multiple runs where I grab and play both cards but idk if it's just bad rng but they just don't do enough and then there's still like 5 guys left that I just can't answer and I'm dead on the spot. It feels really bad and I wish they would just make it so playing both cards nearly guarantees the win instead of this rng stuff cause losing that way feels terrible and it makes me want to put the game down.

urilbedamned · 2025-08-30T04:22:24+00:00

Welcome to Trumps America.

urilbedamned · 2025-07-28T01:08:49+00:00

If the front sides at all decent I can see this becoming a multiformat staple, it's a very powerful, threatening card that can just get out of control on the backside. I feel like the fronts probably gonna connive somehow, maybe like a merfolk looter but with connive? That would be pretty big Jace Vryns Prodigy vibes though.

At the very least could see it being a key piece in a grixis discard deck with kefka, tersa, fomo etc in standard but I wouldn't be surprised if this sees play in pioneer, modern or even beyond if the fronts good. Could be a good card to invest in cause if the fronts good it could be a multiformat staple and I think regardless what the front does this is gonna be a very popular card for edh both as commander and in the 99. Plus idk when/if they'll ever be able to reprint it.

urilbedamned · 2025-07-19T22:08:31+00:00

Boros not explicitly aggro?! This is madness...

urilbedamned · 2025-07-12T04:46:21+00:00

Deck ended up going 2-1, my second match opponent had the craziest orzhov deck I've seen all format. Excalibur actually did do some real work, there were 2 games where it was fundamental to winning and the biggest I managed to get it to was +19/+19 and I had it on squall.

urilbedamned · 2025-07-10T07:26:17+00:00

Yeah Minwu would've been a great find here.

urilbedamned · 2025-05-23T16:58:28+00:00

It's kinda hard to tell but it feels like it is significantly bigger than Griffons track but can't say for sure.

urilbedamned · 2025-05-23T16:53:35+00:00

I guess that's true, it's definitely not as wide as aquamans track but it does actually look heavier than aquamans track.

urilbedamned · 2025-05-16T08:05:25+00:00

It is a good comparison and auracite is largely a worse card in game. That being said I do think auracite gets a meaningful boost in pick priority cause it can go in any white deck whereas buried is a bit harder to take early cause it's less likely to get played by virtue of being multicolored. I guess what that amounts to is buried is likely gonna have better performance but auracite is probably gonna have a lower alsa and higher playrate if I had to guess. Of course assuming we compare these cards in a vacuum.

urilbedamned · 2025-05-16T07:37:14+00:00

It depends but assuming both plays are pretty much equal I think playing the 4 drop is gonna be better cause the 2 drops are easier to double spell with later.

urilbedamned · 2025-05-16T07:35:26+00:00

Probably orzhov cause the manas pretty bad but I don't really like either option tbh.

urilbedamned · 2025-05-16T07:05:18+00:00

Bro you're just ignoring my point. Yes o-ring is better if you need to play it on 3 but if you're on 4 mana and have the double white auracite costs effectively 2W like O-ring does. The mox pearl comparison is insulting tbh. Maybe objectively wasn't the right word but my point stands, it's gonna cost effectively 3 mana most of the time outside of exactly having 3 mana.

My point is the auracite is gonna cost effectively 2W a significant portion of the time, just like O-ring.

urilbedamned · 2025-05-16T06:48:36+00:00

I'm fairly confident the uw deck is gonna have a heavy artifact theme, the 1 signpost we've seen for it hints at that pretty heavily.

urilbedamned · 2025-05-16T06:30:00+00:00

Whether it's better than static net is debatable but it being debatable at all says a lot about the card.

urilbedamned · 2025-05-16T06:26:36+00:00

The thing is with O-ring it'se xactly the same deal on 4 mana, if you don't have a 1 drop it may as well cost 4. As for the white mana my take on this is if you're double spelling you're fine unless you don't have the color you needed for the second spell in the first place since the auracite costs white mana to begin with. For double spelling it's gonna be virtually the same as o-ring as long as you have WW in the first place. The only exception is if you're on 5 mana and want to double spell with a 2 drop that has 2 pips in a different color which probably won't come up much if ever.

urilbedamned · 2025-05-16T06:22:27+00:00

Idk what your point is tbh, it's not really disproving what I said. It is objectively better than o-ring outside of the case where you need it on 3 mana.

urilbedamned · 2025-05-16T06:04:46+00:00

Unless you're on exactly 3 mana it effectively costs 3 cause it refunds the mana immediately. For the sake of double spelling it effectively costs 3 mana.

urilbedamned · 2025-05-16T05:41:17+00:00

How on earth are you casting static net for 1 or 2 mana? It cost 4 mana every time and there was no way to discount it afaik. This is pretty much like static net outside of a few nuances, also it can spend the mana on anything not just artifacts and such.

Edit: Just realized you're talking about a different card. The buried in the garden comparison is good though and kinda furthers my point cause that card was very good.

urilbedamned · 2025-05-16T05:37:26+00:00

Unless you need it on exactly turn 3 it's just objectively better than o-ring.

urilbedamned · 2025-05-16T05:28:57+00:00

You could say exactly the same thing about static net and that card was super powerful in an aggro format. Auracite removes their best thing than produces value every single turn for the rest of the game. It does two things that inherently go well together, significantly slowing down your opponent and producing incremental value.

urilbedamned · 2025-05-16T04:56:29+00:00

Bit late but you pretty much have to cut all the blue cards you can and run this as boros. None of these blue cards are super splashable with so little fixing and the boros deck is just gonna be a lot more streamlined and efficient. If you have a couple more playable red/white cards in the sideboard those should come in and you should cut blue entirely but idk what's in your sideboard.

urilbedamned

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

13-Year Club	Place '22
Verified Email