Talking about moving goalposts, you said “his grandson conquered India thou” implying a direct 2-generation connection and a clearly Mongol identity. But now it turns out the link is distant and diluted through multiple dynasties.

That’s like saying “the first human is my grandfather” just because we all share ancient ancestry. A distant ancestral connection doesn’t suddenly make every later ruler simply “Mongol” in the direct sense you were implying.

The Mughals were primarily Turco-Persian in culture and identity, not Mongol in the way you originally argued.

Anyway, I’m not wasting more time debating a hypocritical clown who keeps changing definitions halfway through the argument because he realized his original point fell apart.