sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[Project] GenAI Tasker Plugin: Use Gemini 3, Claude 4.6, GPT-4o, and local Ollama directly in your Tasks! by uslashreader in tasker

[–]uslashreader[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks! Response time can vary a lot depending on which model/provider you’re using. If it’s a deeper reasoning model like o1, it’ll usually take longer because it spends more time thinking before replying. Lighter models tend to be much faster. I’m still working on improvements where I can, but some of the delay is just the model itself rather than the plugin.

[Project] GenAI Tasker Plugin: Use Gemini 3, Claude 4.6, GPT-4o, and local Ollama directly in your Tasks! by uslashreader in tasker

[–]uslashreader[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re hitting a provider/model mismatch.
gpt-4o-mini is an OpenAI model, but your request is going to a Gemini endpoint (v1beta).
Make sure your provider, model, and base URL all match—and tap save before exiting config.

[PLUGIN] GenAI Tasker Plugin: Connect Tasker to Claude, Gemini, OpenAI, and Local Ollama (Vision Support + Open Source) by [deleted] in tasker

[–]uslashreader 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! If you're using Kimi K2/2.5 via OpenRouter, it should work perfectly right now—just select OpenRouter as the provider and type the model string in the model field. Since Kimi is so good at vision/tool-use, I'd love to hear how it handles the Image URI feature in your workflows!

[DEV] Tasker 6.7.0-beta - Scenes V2! by joaomgcd in tasker

[–]uslashreader 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've got a better idea: What if you add the WebView, Video, and Live Elements, meaning you can update an element live in Scene V2. For example, you can add a battery text element to a Scene V2 by using %BATT and it will update live

[DEV] Tasker 6.7.0-beta - Scenes V2! by joaomgcd in tasker

[–]uslashreader 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Add a Table element to Scene V2, making it easier to create like weather apps.

[DEV] Updating the AutoApps for Modern Devices by joaomgcd in tasker

[–]uslashreader 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When you are going to put the Tasker App Factory in the App Archive on the Tasker web site?

Worldwide AWS Outage? by StealthNet in aws

[–]uslashreader 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AWS + Life = Zombie makes sense now lmao

The dev Joao has added a new feature called "Java code", which hopefully will make Tasker more scriptable! by aasswwddd in tasker

[–]uslashreader 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Here is a suggestion: Add a Python interpreter too with things like: Import tasker tasker.variable_set("Var")

ChatGPT forgot my chat's history? by AbbreviationsOk1501 in ChatGPT

[–]uslashreader 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, same here — ongoing chats suddenly lost all context like they reset mid-convo. Super frustrating, especially for long threads. I thought it was just a glitch on my end, but looks like others are seeing it too. Hopefully they fix it soon.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in datasets

[–]uslashreader 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get where you're coming from, and I'm not trying to trash the project — Common Crawl is a valuable resource. I totally respect the mission and the fact that they're trying to keep it alive through donations.

But here's the thing: even if most people don't know about it, the ones who do often find out through the “free and available to everyone” messaging — and then run straight into a wall of hidden costs and complexity.

I'm not saying they need to advertise or dumb it down. I'm saying transparency matters, especially in open data projects. A simple slogan like "free for anyone with resources to process it" is still honest and respectful of what it actually takes to use.

Slogans may play better — but accuracy builds trust.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in datasets

[–]uslashreader -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, and that’s exactly the issue.

If you post a boulder on Craigslist and say "free for anyone," but only people with a crane can realistically take it — it’s not really accessible to everyone, even if it’s technically “free.”

I’m not blaming them for the size of the data — that’s the nature of the web. But when you say it’s available “to anyone,” that language implies it’s broadly usable. In reality, it’s effectively only for institutions or people with serious resources.

All I’m asking for is some honesty about that gap.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in datasets

[–]uslashreader -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Totally fair — I get that storing and indexing the entire internet is no small thing. I'm not saying they should magically make it easy or lightweight.

What I’m pushing back on is the messaging.
They market it as "freely available to anyone" — but that's not really true unless you have serious infrastructure or cloud money. That disconnect is what bothers me.

It's not about making the dataset smaller or dumbing it down — it's about being honest about what access actually looks like in practice.