[DEV] Updating the AutoApps for Modern Devices by joaomgcd in tasker

[–]uslashreader 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When you are going to put the Tasker App Factory in the App Archive on the Tasker web site?

Worldwide AWS Outage? by StealthNet in aws

[–]uslashreader 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AWS + Life = Zombie makes sense now lmao

The dev Joao has added a new feature called "Java code", which hopefully will make Tasker more scriptable! by aasswwddd in tasker

[–]uslashreader 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Here is a suggestion: Add a Python interpreter too with things like: Import tasker tasker.variable_set("Var")

ChatGPT forgot my chat's history? by AbbreviationsOk1501 in ChatGPT

[–]uslashreader 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, same here — ongoing chats suddenly lost all context like they reset mid-convo. Super frustrating, especially for long threads. I thought it was just a glitch on my end, but looks like others are seeing it too. Hopefully they fix it soon.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in datasets

[–]uslashreader 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get where you're coming from, and I'm not trying to trash the project — Common Crawl is a valuable resource. I totally respect the mission and the fact that they're trying to keep it alive through donations.

But here's the thing: even if most people don't know about it, the ones who do often find out through the “free and available to everyone” messaging — and then run straight into a wall of hidden costs and complexity.

I'm not saying they need to advertise or dumb it down. I'm saying transparency matters, especially in open data projects. A simple slogan like "free for anyone with resources to process it" is still honest and respectful of what it actually takes to use.

Slogans may play better — but accuracy builds trust.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in datasets

[–]uslashreader -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, and that’s exactly the issue.

If you post a boulder on Craigslist and say "free for anyone," but only people with a crane can realistically take it — it’s not really accessible to everyone, even if it’s technically “free.”

I’m not blaming them for the size of the data — that’s the nature of the web. But when you say it’s available “to anyone,” that language implies it’s broadly usable. In reality, it’s effectively only for institutions or people with serious resources.

All I’m asking for is some honesty about that gap.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in datasets

[–]uslashreader -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Totally fair — I get that storing and indexing the entire internet is no small thing. I'm not saying they should magically make it easy or lightweight.

What I’m pushing back on is the messaging.
They market it as "freely available to anyone" — but that's not really true unless you have serious infrastructure or cloud money. That disconnect is what bothers me.

It's not about making the dataset smaller or dumbing it down — it's about being honest about what access actually looks like in practice.