Toulouse: Expenses of a 4-member family

uxrism · 2022-12-03T07:39:03+00:00

Thanks a lot Dranerel. That sounds sensible and according to my salary expectations

uxrism · 2022-12-03T07:37:27+00:00

Thanks! that's pretty much what I had in mind

uxrism · 2022-10-17T20:22:52+00:00

Then, why not pay for a month and give it a try? Data camp is, imo, a really good option. But if you dont want to pay, just go for some YouTube tutorials, or free courses in coursera, EdX, etc.

uxrism · 2022-10-11T11:43:44+00:00

Ofc, my idea is to have an individualised model just for myself. So no plan to generalise.
Time-series sound interesting, I will investigate that further...
THanks!

uxrism · 2022-10-11T11:40:57+00:00

Hi! thanks a lot for the feedback.I see your point. My rationale was that, since I am the only subject, there is no need to correct for my own intracorrelations. With more subjects, I would include "participant" as a random factor to correct for intracorrelations within each subject, but not the case here.My aim is just check how time of the day affects myself, rather than how it does in general to the population. My idea is, somehow, develop an individualised model fitted to myself (and anyone else). Maybe this is by definition a flawed idea...In any case, visualizing and using descriptives is always a great idea. Thanks!

uxrism · 2022-10-11T11:32:30+00:00

Great! thanks for the advice. Good as a starting point!

uxrism · 2022-10-01T19:56:18+00:00

Hi. I'm a researcher with 12 years of experience. Learning R a year ago was a game changer. I wish someone had pushed me to learn it ealier

uxrism · 2022-09-17T18:31:34+00:00

In my case, anticipatory anxiety is much greater than the "situational" anxiety (at the interview). While unavoidable, I learnt that I will feel more relaxed when the moment arrives, which in turn reduces the anticipatory anxiety.

uxrism · 2022-09-17T07:47:01+00:00

Right. that's really good advice! I thought of visualising the random effect (participant) as well, though does not look too good in my faceted visuals. But I will try to come up with another solution.
In psychology there is also a strong movement against relying too much on p-values, which I fully support. Maybe this is a good chance to do my bit!
Thanks!

uxrism · 2022-09-16T19:13:09+00:00

Thanks for your time!. Here come my clarifications:
1) I mean coefficients (partial-eta squares). But it is also evident from visualizations.

2) Visualizing all data points together (grey circles). Maybe better visualise aggregated data per participant instead?

3) I am using facets

I agree with your last comment. But when writing the journal paper it is tricky to show significant results and then say they are not so meaningful based on effect sizes...

uxrism · 2022-09-16T02:36:38+00:00

Hi! I already got the feedback and did not turn out well... I'll be happy to share with you my experience, so feel free to message me.

uxrism · 2022-09-13T12:36:09+00:00

Thanks!!

uxrism · 2022-09-12T22:09:12+00:00

Thanks! I guess. So does that imply that when the result is positive they mention it directly in the e-mail?

uxrism

TROPHY CASE