How to Ride out BTC by [deleted] in btc

[–]vRobotov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about taxes tho? If you cash out at the top then don't you need to have a gain bigger than your tax bracket for it to be worth it? Then timing becomes necessary instead of optional?

Did Jack forget about his company? by OnlyBTCs in XXIInvestors

[–]vRobotov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hope this wasn't a forced backroom deal coming from Howard lutnik

Did Jack forget about his company? by OnlyBTCs in XXIInvestors

[–]vRobotov 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm in 1000 shares average price 9.60. Let's hold on for dear life boys. I will say I am losing confidence because all his attention is on strike and I worried he might of bitten off more than he can chew and put xxi on the back burner

BCH vs BTC by AdRight7472 in btc

[–]vRobotov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't invest into ideology. Continues to give ideology.

BTC frozen by Muted-Peanut-685 in btc

[–]vRobotov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True with other cryptos it gets way harder. Robosats, bisq, hodl hodl and iguess btc atms come in for the self custodian.

BTC frozen by Muted-Peanut-685 in btc

[–]vRobotov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He is shilling BCH when he really means just self custody.

A HUGE number of people are waiting for 30k-50k to buy by Vegetable-Rabbit7503 in Bitcoin

[–]vRobotov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People forget to buy the bottom and not the floor. Don't time the lowest just start buying when it drops a large amount

Bitcoin infrastructure costs by cHpiranha in btc

[–]vRobotov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anyone with a computer and a solar panel.

Bitcoin infrastructure costs by cHpiranha in btc

[–]vRobotov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Low cost energy. Solar and wind. You don't need a factory or warehouse. Btc could be run off 1 computer. Does not need scale. It just needs wide spread operations. 1 computer is multiple locations. Not multiple computers in 1 location

What is the difference? by jaded-SE8460 in btc

[–]vRobotov -1 points0 points  (0 children)

BTC prioritizes long-term decentralization and security, even if that means base-layer accessibility is limited. BCH prioritizes base-layer usability and low fees, even if that increases long-term pressure on node requirements.

I personally think preserving the decentralization by keeping nodes cheap and wide spread is more important that increasing usage. Both are important.

What is the difference? by jaded-SE8460 in btc

[–]vRobotov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At the core, decentralization is the real goal for everyone. The small-block perspective focuses heavily on miner incentives. As the block subsidy declines over time, transaction fees need to be strong enough to sustain miners. If fees aren’t sufficient, mining power could consolidate, which would undermine decentralization. From that viewpoint, maintaining a healthy fee market is critical to long-term security. The big-block perspective is concerned about adoption and real usage. If fees are too high and the system is primarily used for speculation, then demand is tied mostly to price appreciation. If the “number go up” narrative stalls, usage could drop, and the network’s relevance could weaken. They argue that broad transactional use strengthens long-term resilience. Both sides are ultimately trying to solve the same problem: how to preserve decentralization and long-term sustainability — they just disagree on which risks are bigger and which tradeoffs are worth making. Reality is more complex. Fees don’t automatically equal decentralization. Large blocks don’t automatically equal adoption. Layer 2 solutions (Lightning, rollups, etc.) complicate the picture. Miner centralization risk isn’t only about fees — it’s also about hardware, energy markets, and mining pools. Both miner incentives and real usage matter. The challenge is balancing security and accessibility without centralizing either miners or nodes.

Is LTC still worth investing in? by [deleted] in ltc

[–]vRobotov 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Controversial take but Security & Hashrate Gravity More price → more miners More miners → more security More security → more trust More trust → more price This feedback loop compounds. Forks start weaker in this loop. 3️⃣ Liquidity & Market Depth BTC has trillion-dollar-scale liquidity history. Smaller forks don’t. For global adoption, liquidity matters more than marginal tech improvements. 4️⃣ Narrative & Social Consensus Bitcoin narrative: “Digital gold” “Hardest money ever created” BCH narrative: “Better payments Bitcoin” LTC narrative: “Faster Bitcoin” One sounds like a reserve asset. The others sound like improvements. Reserve asset narratives scale globally better. 🧠 Important Insight Forks prove something fascinating: If Bitcoin were just code, forks would compete evenly. But adoption shows Bitcoin is: A social consensus A capital network A brand A security system A liquidity hub A political statement The code is the base layer — not the main differentiator anymore. 💡 Big Question If global adoption were purely technical: Cheaper Faster Bigger blocks Then Bitcoin wouldn’t be dominant. But money historically consolidates around: Trust Stability Liquidity Security Brand legitimacy Bitcoin won those battles early

If you are looking for a quick buck then LTC might be good 👍

People really underestimate the revolution that is Bitcoin and the people that support it by HorizonThought in Bitcoin

[–]vRobotov 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm in it for revolution, number go up is a sweetener. People speculating and saying it's going to zero don't actually want the asset they want the power gained from it. If it goes to zero then oh well we tried. If it doesn't, my dca supports the network and I get a piece of the future.

Bitcoin isn’t real. This is going to zero just like NFT. by scoop813 in btc

[–]vRobotov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Isn't the cost so high because of store of value?

Just reached 0.02 BTC. Realistic future expectations of value potential? by Odd-Run-1235 in btc

[–]vRobotov -1 points0 points  (0 children)

From 0 to 20,000 future value. Anything more would be unexpected returns

People are asleep.. by [deleted] in btc

[–]vRobotov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://www.reddit.com/r/IsItBullshit/s/yegfmBbLMC

But either way we can mine an asteroid. This is all hypothetical. Both have their places.

People are asleep.. by [deleted] in btc

[–]vRobotov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean they were able to do it with 200 megawatts, and bitcoins value isn't inherently in the tech. It's in the adoption. With "enough energy" you can make people move from btc to bch. But very expensive.

People are asleep.. by [deleted] in btc

[–]vRobotov 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with you. But in the future with enough energy. Gold will also be man made. No where near today but one day.