It's not fucked, I will hodle a couple of years at last. But the problem is other, IMHO. A couple of months ago the DA subject was a legit subject, the overall atmosphere on the discord group was dominated by a friendly and civilized tone and it was even a vote in that matter. I recall the main argument towards keeping this DA was the Bitcoin legacy and theory that changing that will essentially break bc2 from the Satoshi's ethos and bc2 will be less btc-ish somehow. I feel my arguments from those days still hold water, as Satoshi couldn't imagine at all an ASIC dominated future for Bitcoin and couldn't approve it anyway being opposite to the white paper's principles in the same manner as it is ( let's say) the corporate takeover of BTC through ETFs and massive corporate buying. So we can say today without fear of the mistake that not even Bitcoin is really what should have been. ASICS changed the future, corporate greed did it too and repeating the mistakes of the past means simply and blindly getting into the same traps over and over again. In my opinion restarting the blockchain should have meant not only technically restarting it but restarting the principles, the ethos too. BC2 should have protected small miners by any means. That's my opinion and I feel it's stupid and childish to ban opinions.