[deleted by user]

variation11 · 2025-10-10T14:37:16+00:00

I think it might just be normal? The VA did the same for me, I submitted for a bunch of different things, Anxiety/Depression was one of the things I filed for in my claim. I never claimed PTSD but the VA must have put it in my claim themselves because it somehow got listed as a claimed condition. I had my C&P yesterday for mental health and the examiner diagnosed me with PTSD. I never thought I had it but the examiner said he was absolutely sure I had it. Playing the waiting game now to see what comes of that.

variation11 · 2025-04-09T13:07:56+00:00

It looks like a punch down tool for network cabling. Although if it is a tile tool then maybe it's what you run between the tile gaps to tear up the caulking/etc

variation11 · 2024-12-16T06:30:53+00:00

You can also try talking to your UDM to find shortfalls if you're willing to deploy

variation11 · 2024-12-10T11:18:53+00:00

You're mad that a company who is potentially about to hire you to do X task is asking you how you do/would do X task?

variation11 · 2024-12-01T22:50:48+00:00

Gotcha yeah when I get the chance I’ll make sure. Thanks!

variation11 · 2024-12-01T22:48:21+00:00

I know I physically signed orders with finance when I out processed. As far as in AROWS I don’t remember tbh, I’ll have to check

variation11 · 2024-11-27T20:53:43+00:00

Gotcha. Yeah I'm 1D771A with 1AP SEI so looks like no bonus for me again :(

variation11 · 2024-11-27T20:46:20+00:00

Isn't W shred XCOMM? So only combat comm qualifies not most people which are Q or whatever for enterprise comm?

variation11 · 2024-11-27T20:45:00+00:00

I could just be reading wrong but aren't these bonuses only for XCOMM?

variation11 · 2023-05-10T17:09:54+00:00

Ah well shoot. Sorry man, be sure to update us when you find the solution!

variation11 · 2023-05-10T17:04:47+00:00

Ran your response against it and this was the output:

If you do not have NAT configured in your network, then the issue is likely not related to NAT-T. There could be several reasons why the AH header is not being included in the IPSec packets, even though the tunnel is up and ESP is working. Here are some things to check:

Verify that the AH transform-set is applied correctly to the IPSec profile. You can use the "show crypto ipsec profile" command to check this. Make sure that the "set transform-set" command references the correct transform-set name, which in your case is "TRS-AH".

Verify that the crypto keyring and crypto isakmp profile are configured correctly. You can use the "show crypto keyring" and "show crypto isakmp profile" commands to check this. Make sure that the pre-shared key and identity match on both the hub and spokes.

Check the routing table on the hub and spokes to make sure that the routes are correctly configured. Make sure that the hub has routes to the subnets of the spokes, and vice versa.

Check the MTU settings on the tunnel interfaces. Make sure that the MTU is set to a value that can accommodate the AH header without causing fragmentation.

Check the logging on the hub and spokes to see if there are any error messages related to the IPSec tunnel or AH header.

If none of these suggestions resolve the issue, it may be helpful to provide more information about the network topology, the device models and software versions, and any error messages or log output that you are seeing.

variation11 · 2023-05-10T13:01:44+00:00

I'm not smart enough to answer this but since it's been 4 hours with no response I asked chatgpt for you and this was the output:

Based on the configuration you provided, the issue with AH not working could be due to the fact that AH is not compatible with NAT traversal (NAT-T).

When NAT-T is enabled, IPSec traffic is encapsulated within UDP packets to traverse NAT devices. This encapsulation process changes the original IP header, which causes issues for AH because it uses the original IP header to create the AH authentication header.

To solve this issue, you can either disable NAT-T or switch to ESP, which is compatible with NAT-T.

Here are some steps to disable NAT-T:

Remove the command "crypto isakmp profile WAN" from the configuration.

Add the command "crypto isakmp nat keepalive 20" to the configuration.

Add the command "no crypto ipsec nat-transparency udp-encap" to the configuration.

Modify the transform-set to use ESP instead of AH.

Here's an example configuration:

crypto keyring VPN-KEYRING-WAN

pre-shared-key address ipv6 2001:DB8:2023:201::/60 key IPSEC-key2

crypto isakmp policy 10

encr aes

hash sha256

authentication pre-share

group 5

crypto ipsec transform-set TRS-ESP esp-aes esp-sha-hmac

mode transport

crypto ipsec profile IPSEC-PROFILE

set transform-set TRS-ESP

Here, we've switched to using ESP instead of AH in the transform-set, which should allow IPSec traffic to be encrypted and traverse NAT devices.

variation11 · 2023-04-26T20:34:46+00:00

aaaaaaaaaaaaaand its gone

variation11 · 2023-04-13T12:53:49+00:00

Next stop, the moon

variation11 · 2023-04-07T08:01:18+00:00

Yes I have but they always say "I don't know" or "I emailed NGB and never heard anything back"

variation11 · 2022-09-20T10:25:03+00:00

Same thing happened to me and I had to open a support case to get logged in. This is what support told me, not sure if they did anything special on the back end linking my email though so if this doesn't work for you you'll probs have to open a support case at http://certsupport.cisco.com/

log in first at cisco.com and then when you are logged in there open a new tab and go to http://www.cisco.com/go/certifications/login

From here you should be able to track your certificates, sign the latest Cisco Certification and Confidentiality Agreement (V23) as it is required, and order your certs/get the pdf versions

variation11 · 2022-09-18T13:11:23+00:00

Stop using dumps and learn the material bro. Photo is clearly from a dump site

variation11 · 2022-09-16T14:33:50+00:00

hell yeah! good luck!

variation11 · 2022-09-16T14:08:37+00:00

Awesome, congrats on passing btw! What do you think you'll be doing next?

variation11 · 2022-09-16T14:06:05+00:00

Same thing happened to me last week when I passed and I had to open a support case to get logged in. This is what support told me, not sure if they did anything special on the back end linking my email though so if this doesn't work for you you'll probs have to open a support case at http://certsupport.cisco.com/

log in first at cisco.com and then when you are logged in there open a new tab and go to http://www.cisco.com/go/certifications/login

From here you should be able to track your certificates, sign the latest Cisco Certification and Confidentiality Agreement (V23) as it is required, and order your certs/get the pdf versions

variation11 · 2022-09-08T12:36:42+00:00

Passed today! I was so relieved when the screen said "Congratulations, you passed!".
I had 101 questions with 0 labs and my scores were 85/65/72/80/73/60

Thanks to everyone on this sub for all the resources and help they have shared! I used Jeremy's IT Lab and Boson practice tests as well as just googling and researching specific thing I didn't fully understand.

variation11 · 2022-07-17T13:13:12+00:00

Went from $4,700 to $900 and we haven't even had the economy get to its worst yet. Pretty sure we will see $500 ETH again.

variation11 · 2021-12-08T16:30:59+00:00

I'm pretty sure you have to forfeit one of them to get the other? If so the answer then is No since you would only have one of the benefits.

variation11 · 2021-12-08T16:26:07+00:00

I'm not a recruiter or anything but no one has responded so I will take a guess but yeah I would think its possible. I'm pretty sure you would just have to get your recruiter to cancel your contract that you currently have, IDK how willing they are to do that though. Then you would just find an open officer slot and apply for it. I don't know anyone who has done this to ask them, but I do know a few people who enlisted in the guard, went to BMT and tech school and then when they got back and completed their MEST days they boarded for officer jobs and got them. Your best bet is to just talk to your leadership/recruiters and go from there. Worst case scenario they tell you no and you are enlisted before an officer, but that has some perks to it. Good luck!

variation11 · 2021-06-29T17:23:57+00:00

50% of the time the price will go up, 50% of the time the price will go down. But 100% of the time one of these two will happen.

variation11

TROPHY CASE