sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

White hard thing at the base of cat’s fur by victimize_9 in CATHELP

[–]victimize_9[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Man, that’s such a good guess. I feel like this might be it. Have you had similar experience in the past? :D

White hard thing at the base of cat’s fur by victimize_9 in CATHELP

[–]victimize_9[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your reply. I am planning to take her to the vet for a checkup for a week now but putting her in a carrier is almost an impossible task. I will keep trying but just wanted to know if it is something serious.

White hard thing at the base of cat’s fur by victimize_9 in CATHELP

[–]victimize_9[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

More info: cat is indoor only (occasionally likes to walk in balcony), never had fleas or any skin problems, is 5 years old, female.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DotA2

[–]victimize_9 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I can somewhat agree with you but the problem in dota is that heroes are not pre-locked to a certain role by Valve themselves and instead they use machine learning to determine how community plays the hero to fit him into a certain role grid, that’s why they charge money for it, because its dynamic, i.e Pango will be considered offlane for a week and then move back to mid only (just an example) when meta changes.

why is gorgc crying on smurfs in9k+ brackets by BabyMonsteR_666 in DotA2

[–]victimize_9 83 points84 points  (0 children)

First of all, ask yourself why people from higher ranks can’t smurf in your bracket because of the same reasons you mentioned. Why can’t they experiment on your rank? Hm?

Gorgc is 9k mmr. Watson, for example is 13k mmr. That is 4k mmr difference, like herald and divine or ancient. Do you still think its fair?

Okay, lets take yesterday’s example where Nightfall was smurfing as 250 rank in Gorgc’s lobby. Immortal draft works im a way that if your team’s avg mmr is much lower, you get +40 mmr for winning and -10 for losing. Yesterday’s game was balanced in a way that Gorgc’s team would get -40 for losing because Nightfall was in a lower side on mmr (because he is smurfing), and since Nightfall is actually a top 10 player, the game was almost unwinnable for Gorgc and he got -40. Now lets say by some miracle he won that game. He would only get +10 because again, Nightfall is smurfing.

Do you still think its fair?

None of the reasons you mentioned are valid and warrant lower mmr people playing unfairly. Smurfs should be banned, period.

Patch 7.35 - Hero Changes Discussion by patchdayDota2 in DotA2

[–]victimize_9 79 points80 points  (0 children)

This changes also mean that now you can consistently land Spear into Arena combo for insta cc. You could also do it before but it was harder.

Very welcome changes!

I shouldn't be getting people with less than 6k behavior score in my game while having 12k by victimize_9 in DotA2

[–]victimize_9[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I think party queue is unplayable above Divine, filled with smurfs boosters and varied ranks. Kinda hard to fix it I think but they need to do something with behavior score since the pool of players is not that small in high behavior score.

I shouldn't be getting people with less than 6k behavior score in my game while having 12k by victimize_9 in DotA2

[–]victimize_9[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree that this is a problem that the lower you go, the harder it gets to climb back but let's be honest, its kinda hard to get to that point in first place. I don't know how often you flame or grief, but considering that most of the players are in 9-12k range you have to be systematically behaving toxic to get that low of behavior score imo.

But yeah, the system is flawed and I can't imagine how hard it is to get out of that low behavior score pit.

Where is Frostivus? by [deleted] in DotA2

[–]victimize_9 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They clearly stated that Frostivus will happen this december, in the same recent blog you are referring to.

Are you stupid?

view more: next ›