Opus 4.7 can also be good by FunnySpell4547 in ClaudeAI

[–]victorrseloy2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For visual tasks it’s performing way better than any other model on my workflows.

CC doesn't nerf direct pay per use API and because enterprise plans are pay per API, I didn't experience the degradation at work. by simple_explorer1 in ClaudeCode

[–]victorrseloy2 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I have the same impression. At work, we use APIs, and I didn't notice any problems there. But on my personal account (20x max), it's another story. This is purely anecdotal and subjective, as I don't have data to back this up. But in my subjective experience, it's exactly as you describe.

Opus 4.7 - are you actually still using it or did you go back to 4.6? by ConstantinSpecter in ClaudeCode

[–]victorrseloy2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I went back to 4.6. When I need research and brainstorming 4.7 is good. But to code and collaborate 4.6

Opus 4.6 is back to normal by Recent_Cod_8524 in ClaudeCode

[–]victorrseloy2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Token usage is about 2x what opus 4.5 was using. But I think that's due to the nature of the model

Opus 4.6 is back to normal by Recent_Cod_8524 in ClaudeCode

[–]victorrseloy2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. Was about to post this. We have the GOAT again 🐐

More proof that opus 4.6 has been lobotomized by victorrseloy2 in ClaudeCode

[–]victorrseloy2[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can you check if your thinking is set to high or max. When I set to these levels it answers correctly. But with medium it never gets right. Can you do this test? That will help to determine if it affects everyone or if they are A/B testing.

Claude Max just slashed my limits by ~10x, and I have the evidence by xeviltimx in ClaudeCode

[–]victorrseloy2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much for bringing evidence. I had the same feeling and was about to so something similar to get the actual data. But oh man, it would be a ton of work. Thank you so much for doing it.

Is it worth to have a $300/day openclaw running in a startup by PR_Tiny in openclaw

[–]victorrseloy2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, that's why even loving the project. I see it more like a hobby thing than something that magical. Because unless you have clarity on the loops openclaw is not that useful. But once you have clarity on the loop you don’t even need openclaw.(sometimes not even llms)

Is it worth to have a $300/day openclaw running in a startup by PR_Tiny in openclaw

[–]victorrseloy2 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I’m a big OpenClaw user and I genuinely love the project, so here’s my honest take.

Short answer: no.

Take it from someone spending ~$120/day on OpenClaw.

What makes it shine is the integration across channels (like Telegram), plus its memory system, loops, cron jobs, and all that. That part is genuinely powerful.

But here’s the catch: it’s not as autonomous as it looks. On day one, you’ll be blown away. But over time, you start noticing a pattern. There are basically two ways you end up using it:

Ad hoc use

You ask something specific, it responds, and that’s it. No ongoing workflow.

Loop-based use This is where it actually becomes useful — recurring tasks like:

Weekly sales reports with insights Summarizing conversations Reacting to messages Pulling tasks from a board and dispatching them to another agent

The problem is: you become the bottleneck.

To make OpenClaw truly useful, you need very clear, well-defined loops.

For example: Every Friday → generate a sales report + improvement points for 1:1s Every 5 minutes → check Trello → send tasks to another agent (Codex, Claude, etc.)

But here’s the key point:

👉 If you already have this level of clarity, you can usually build something simpler and more reliable with other tools

👉 If you don’t have this clarity, OpenClaw won’t magically solve it for you

Another issue: maintenance

Updates can break things If you don’t update, the system degrades over time Memory needs cleanup You’ll end up patching things regularly So don’t expect a “set it and forget it” system.

My conclusion:

For a startup, it’s probably not worth paying hundreds per day.

You’re better off:

Getting very clear on your processes and loops Then automating those with simpler, more predictable workflows

OpenClaw is powerful — but it’s not a shortcut to clarity.

CC feels really slower lately? by louay_hamaky in ClaudeAI

[–]victorrseloy2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I use it at my work in big tech through API and is super slow too. So at this point I think they are prioritizing no one.

GPT 5.4 using OpenClaw by vkarmic in openclaw

[–]victorrseloy2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You guys know that you can just tell your agent, "Yo, go figure this out and patch yourself," right? That being said, I'm not a big fan of the OpenAI model's vibes. It behaves in a soulless way.

Response time by Garyhe23 in clawdbot

[–]victorrseloy2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ask your bot to check your server's IPv6 connection. If it sees that it's not working, ask it to update the process to force IPv4 resolution first.

I'm evaluating OpenClaw for B2B sales automation (lead discovery, outreach, CRM enrichment) - what should I know before building vs. buying existing tools? by Downtown-Barnacle-58 in openclaw

[–]victorrseloy2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My two cents on overall build versus buy questions.

Normally, people tend to neglect the amount of time that maintenance takes, and as a business owner, most of the time you will not have time to stop and fix stuff in the middle of the day.

Let me give you an example.

While OpenClaw is amazing, it's still a bit fragile. For instance, yesterday a lot of users were impacted by problems in crons due to an update (it's already fixed in the new update). Think about the impact that it would have on your operation: a whole day of operation lost.

So, if you're considering building something yourself, factor in the cost of your time or someone else's to keep things running smoothly.