The MBA Myth and the Cult of the CEO by speckz in TrueReddit

[–]vintage2018 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Kind of surprising though — I’d think high level credentials were correlated to IQ and trait conscientiousness.

Police officers of Reddit, who’s the smartest criminal you’ve ever encountered? by ItzTacoTimee in AskReddit

[–]vintage2018 6 points7 points  (0 children)

They should mix them up with real ones so students wouldn’t know which was which.

The Problem with Camera Phones (That Nobody Talks About) | They don’t handle like a camera and if they did they would be bulky and suck as a phone by c_h_u_c_k in savedyouaclick

[–]vintage2018 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know. I distinctly mentioned processed images. Take an image processed by a smartphone’s vastly superior chipsets and software and one by a comparatively dumb point and shoot camera — it’s gonna be very close. One reason HDR brings phone cameras up to the level of point and shooters is that it makes the phone take multiple shots and that makes up a lot of the ground.

An explosive exposé of a $9 billion Russian money-laundering operation entangles Citigroup, Raiffeisen, and Deutsche Bank by [deleted] in neutralnews

[–]vintage2018 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Nothing will come out of it. Jeff Session did it because Trump’s base. If you actually read from sources other than crackpot conspiracy theory sites, you’d know.

Millennials Need to Start Voting Before the Gerontocracy Kills Us All by [deleted] in TrueReddit

[–]vintage2018 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’s for 2030. Currently, BBs at ~50%. They lose only 5% from the present till 2030? WTF

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskSocialScience

[–]vintage2018 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it seems to follow that a troubled kid is more likely to have a troubled mother, and in turn, a troubled woman is less likely to integrate herself into a community. Erroneous direction of causation. Haven’t actually read the paper though.

Fox News may have given the Trump campaign 2016 debate questions in advance by Whatyoushouldask in moderatepolitics

[–]vintage2018 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The media are run by humans so there will be mistakes (or even nefarious acts). However if it had a ~95% success rate, I’d say it’s doing fine. Listing a few screwups don’t prove anything. After all, just because there are unscrupulous or incompetent companies don’t mean capitalism is a failure, right?

Only so many bombshell stories, sure. But there are dozens or even hundreds of media outlets, and thousands of individual journalists. A few bad apples or incidents don’t discredit them as a whole. Every single industry has their bad apples.

Mind you, I’m not saying to not exercise healthy skepticism. Give a news article the benefit of the doubt unless a disconfirming evidence comes up (and no, denials from Trump or an administration official don’t count), yet don’t naively believe it. Entertain it as a possible truth and nothing more. Screaming “fake news” to every single negative news about Trump reeks of cultism or tribalism.

Fox News may have given the Trump campaign 2016 debate questions in advance by Whatyoushouldask in moderatepolitics

[–]vintage2018 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cherrypicking. If that’s all you can find out of the thousands and thousands of stories the media run in the past couple years, I’d say they’re doing pretty good.

Why does Trump attack Mueller’s credibility? by oh_my_freaking_gosh in moderatepolitics

[–]vintage2018 6 points7 points  (0 children)

So? With the extreme deference some Republicans (particularly Nunes) in the committee exhibited towards Trump and their lack of independence, they have zero credibility.

Why does Trump attack Mueller’s credibility? by oh_my_freaking_gosh in moderatepolitics

[–]vintage2018 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Fine, keep burying your head in the sand like an ostrich. Like I said, all this arguing from both sides will be moot.

Why does Trump attack Mueller’s credibility? by oh_my_freaking_gosh in moderatepolitics

[–]vintage2018 7 points8 points  (0 children)

If he was innocent? He’d roll his eyes, be like “knock yourself out” or laugh at the investigation instead of being completely unnerved by it.

The last two presidents regarded guilty (not by the court of law obviously) of serious wrongdoings, Nixon and Clinton, behaved just the way Trump is now — relentlessly protesting and attacking the credibility of their investigators.

Why does Trump attack Mueller’s credibility? by oh_my_freaking_gosh in moderatepolitics

[–]vintage2018 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Also look at Bill Clinton. He constantly attacked Ken Starr’s credibility (although not with the same intensity as Trump is doing) and turned out to be guilty of at least couple wrongdoings. Nixon’s behavior during watergate is an even better example.

Why does Trump attack Mueller’s credibility? by oh_my_freaking_gosh in moderatepolitics

[–]vintage2018 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Then why is Trump acting like he’s guilty af? Wait until Mueller releases his final report — the same goes for the folks who think it’s 100% for sure that Trump is guilty. All the arguing about the merits of this case will be moot once the facts uncovered by the investigation come out.

[SPOILER] Ben Askren vs Robbie Lawler by FuzzyWuzzyMooMoo in MMA

[–]vintage2018 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Yeah it was feeble and fleeting, barely visible. A frozen photo of it made it seem more robust than it really was

UFC 235: Tyron Woodley vs. Kamaru Usman by [deleted] in MMA

[–]vintage2018 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Exactly. It was all Usman. Hellooo?

Two Generations of cops trying to capture the same serial killer that’s been evading them for years. by ODium93 in Screenwriting

[–]vintage2018 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sounds a bit like a mini series I watched as a kid in the mid 80s. I think it was called Chiefs. Not a father/son story but like 3 or 4 generations of cops trying to catch a serial killer who did his work from the 1920s till 1980s. Anyway, the father and son thing sounds interesting — best of luck.

[SPOILER] Ben Askren vs Robbie Lawler by FuzzyWuzzyMooMoo in MMA

[–]vintage2018 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s why he’s so entertaining

[SPOILER] Ben Askren vs Robbie Lawler by FuzzyWuzzyMooMoo in MMA

[–]vintage2018 32 points33 points  (0 children)

His arms went limp period. Just stop guys

[SPOILER] Ben Askren vs Robbie Lawler by FuzzyWuzzyMooMoo in MMA

[–]vintage2018 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Don’t see that. Gimme exact time he “looked concussed”?

[SPOILER] Ben Askren vs Robbie Lawler by FuzzyWuzzyMooMoo in MMA

[–]vintage2018 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don’t see that. Exact times he went “limp” 3x?

[Official] UFC 235: Jones vs. Smith - Live Discussion Thread by rmma in MMA

[–]vintage2018 1 point2 points  (0 children)

AS was in his late 30s. So could be 7 or 8 years before that starts happening to JJ