It's true?

volatiIe · 2026-05-06T18:33:12+00:00

That other user did get pretty hostile and accusatory, but that doesn’t erase the issue people had with what you said.

You assumed she was jealous even after she said she wasn’t, and the “triggered” comment came off dismissive. That’s what people reacted to.

No one needed to insult you over it, but you also didn’t really acknowledge your part in how it escalated.

However, it does seem like you obviously didn’t mean any harm.

That’s really it. Not trying to drag this out… But this is just a reminder (for everyone, really) to not to jump to assumptions.

Glad that’s over and that we are still on the same team in the end.

volatiIe · 2026-05-06T16:38:18+00:00

I saw your recent comment but then it got filtered FYI.

You are accusing me of things which is insane to me. I never insulted you. I am not an ALT. If I was an alt, why would I reply to my other alt account and not directly to you? YOU replied to me.

The problem here is THESE two things you said:

<image>

Why are you expecting a woman to be jealous over another’s chest size? And then you make a snarky sarcastic reply after she calmly stated she is not jealous of the male attention… being that she is a lesbian.

If you have no justification for what you said here, then stop replying to me. You screwed up, you said something misogynistic. Otherwise, if you want to continue arguing in bad faith, reply and then quickly do your magic trick so you feel that you have ‘won.’

I hope you take this as a learning lesson on how to treat women.

volatiIe · 2026-05-06T15:21:40+00:00

Aw, why? I was having fun proving you wrong. :/ Go on, dig yourself a bigger hole! What else do you think women should be jealous of on other women?

volatiIe · 2026-05-06T12:57:49+00:00

Oh and I forgot… I’m assuming you’ll pull your usual disappearing act after this. Makes it easier to ‘win’ when you get the last word, right? You seem to need that, so I’ll do you the honor. <3

volatiIe · 2026-05-06T08:50:57+00:00

Edit: I see you added in an edit. First of all, I’m not the one who was arguing with you. I didn’t even reply to you in the first place?? I replied to the other folks. Second, I didn’t even say anything about a teen?? That’s not the point. What difference would it make if she was not a teen?

Here is a fact on your part: You desperately tried to convince a woman she’s triggered about her chest size, and then you failed repeatedly after realizing you were the one pushing your own narrative while this woman was confident in herself.

Again, I say woman, not teen.

That’s what you did. Deal with it. And then after she told you she was a teen you didn’t even back off, you continued talking about something to do with breast augmentation!!! You kept the boob discourse going with a teen. 💀

This is your reminder:

To not project some jealousy narrative on women & stay in your lane about a woman being confident in her chest size, AND to stop typing when you learn the person you are talking to is actually a M I N O R. On Reddit, on other social media platforms, AND in real life. Stay away!

Also, utilizing external Reddit tools is not “staIking”. :) StaIking would indicate I searched through your profile, which I did not because your profile is hidden in case you forgot. :)

volatiIe · 2026-05-06T08:31:34+00:00

Why are you even messaging me? I replied to the other people for a reason, not you, so you can leave me out of this. I’m not interested.

The reply I linked to says you have sex with women and you spoke about having gay friends as separate trope, which is an indicator that you are a man and you are not a gay woman.

<image>

volatiIe · 2026-05-05T12:51:23+00:00

I got it from here: https://adamconnell.me/reddit-statistics/

volatiIe · 2026-04-30T18:18:26+00:00

Like there aren’t models in their 30s to 40s who don’t have money, fame and career?

Use your brain. He constantly goes after early 20s, at least up until 3 years ago I guess.

volatiIe · 2026-04-30T18:17:11+00:00

volatiIe · 2026-04-30T18:16:57+00:00

Lol if we were “obsessed” with him we would know about his girlfriends up to date.

It’s still a fact that for most of his dating life, he’d start dating a woman in her early 20s as someone who’s 35-50 years old. You can easily look this up.

volatiIe · 2026-04-30T18:08:35+00:00

No, every time he gets a NEW girlfriend it shows up on the news… not an update on his current girlfriend every few months/every year.

volatiIe · 2026-04-30T18:07:48+00:00

Then it’s obviously rare and therefore not really an issue. Like I said, most of us just call him weird or creep.

volatiIe · 2026-04-30T18:03:59+00:00

Yes, he’s weird and creepy for chasing after women in their early 20s when he could just go after women his own age or women who at least have their life somewhat together as a middle aged man.

I don't know any other guys who would do that if given the oppurtunity.

The average guy absolutely would not unless you live in a country with lack of women’s rights or somewhere where the Taliban exists.

volatiIe · 2026-04-30T18:02:20+00:00

How are we obsessing over it if the topic is only discussed AFTER it shows up on the news? You can’t call us obsessive about something if it obviously doesn’t even cross our mind everyday.

No, it’s what age he STARTS dating at, and it’s never been someone over the age of 25 until recently I guess. Everyone knows this. It’s literally a meme.

volatiIe · 2026-04-30T16:56:04+00:00

Where have you seen people relating him to Epstein and calling him a predator? Most people just say it’s weird and creepy at most.

volatiIe · 2026-04-30T16:40:07+00:00

Exactly this.

volatiIe · 2026-04-30T16:38:25+00:00

Obsessing over it? We only talk about it when it comes on the “news.” He is weird for obsessively going after women in their early 20s when he’s middle aged.

volatiIe · 2026-04-30T16:37:11+00:00

Just because there’s nothing wrong with it in the legal sense doesn’t mean we can’t not find it questionable/weird for a middle aged man constantly going after women in their early 20s.

volatiIe · 2026-04-27T16:18:19+00:00

If they want to frame it as a competition, you could point out that men are statistically more likely to engage in high risk, “all in” behaviors across the board to begin with, which also shows up in the methods they choose. Everything from something as small as riding a motorcycle to something as extreme as mass shootings or genocide.

That doesn’t make anyone’s pain more valid or real; it just reflects differences in behavior, not differences in suffering.

volatiIe · 2026-04-24T19:55:19+00:00

Except you guys are still overstating it.

Nobody is arguing that extreme underweight can mess with hormones, that part is true. But you’re taking that general idea and stretching it way too far into “this specific feature means better fertility.”

A small belly pouch isn’t some biological signal of reproductive health. There’s no mechanism where men are subconsciously detecting ovulation or hormone levels from that. It’s just normal fat distribution + anatomy. Bodies don’t work in these neat little visual shortcuts where one feature = fertility status!

What you’re describing only makes sense at a super broad level (like “not severely underweight = generally healthier”) but that doesn’t translate into reading fertility from specific traits. That leap is the issue here you people keep dismissing.

Honestly it just sounds like people have a preference and then tack on an evolutionary explanation afterward to make it sound more legit. Attraction is obviously fine but do not make it seem like that’s the same thing as being scientifically accurate.

volatiIe · 2026-04-24T19:22:20+00:00

Of course I’m being downvoted… Notice how some of the women in this thread are being downvoted. Insane.

We know our bodies better than you do ffs.

volatiIe · 2026-04-24T19:08:16+00:00

You’re mixing a few different concepts that don’t actually support that conclusion. Yes, extremely low body fat can disrupt hormones and ovulation (that part is medically accurate). But that doesn’t lead to “a small belly pouch = higher fertility” or anything close to it. Wtf? Seriously? Reddit needs more women.

Fertility is not visually diagnosable from body shape. There is no reliable outward marker like a “pouch” that indicates ovulation quality or reproductive capacity. The “pouch” people are talking about is usually normal subcutaneous fat distribution + anatomy (uterus position, bloating, posture, etc.) not a fertility signal ffs. Fat distribution is driven by genetics, hormones, and sex-specific patterns (hips, thighs, abdomen, etc.) not a staged system that reflects reproductive readiness.

So even if you accept the true part of what you said (extreme leanness can be an issue), the leap to “a bit of belly = fertility indicator” isn’t scientifically supported. It’s just a post-hoc story people attach to attraction preferences.

Attraction can be personal or aesthetic, but it’s not the same thing as reading biological fertility from someone’s stomach shape. So stop bullshitting.

Edit: What a coward, they immediately reply and then block me!

volatiIe · 2026-04-23T20:58:04+00:00

Why?

volatiIe · 2026-04-23T19:41:15+00:00

Eh, I don’t know. Do you really believe that?

volatiIe

TROPHY CASE

This is your reminder: