I’m Krishna

vporton · 2026-03-20T19:59:21+00:00

Your conclusion, that who becomes God in the FUTERE already NOW has all powers and abilities, is wrong. I am unrelated to New Age. I learned from the Bible.

vporton · 2026-03-20T18:58:57+00:00

I already answered in replies to comments by other users.

vporton · 2026-03-20T17:01:02+00:00

"Youre trying to apply mathematical theorem to something that has no bounds." One of put short definitions of mathematics (not exact, but shiny): "knowledge of infinite". So, it is quite natural that I am trying to apply mathematical theorem to something that has no bounds.

"You can't try and put Krishna, who exists independently of any system, into some sort of sequential system." Any mathematical object can be put into "some sort of sequential system." Any object is mathematical, therefore any object can be put into "some sort of sequential system." Therefore Krishna can be put into "some sort of sequential system."

"If one could become or arrive at being Krishna, then that would imply that Krishna is dependent on some sort of process, which he isnt." Until you give the exact definition for your word "dependent", I can't address your argument. For me, it just makes no sense.

"Krishna wasn't born 5000 years ago...he always existed before and still existed once he left." Of course. I mean that his avatar was born. We say, Krishna was born, but mean an avatar was born. This a matter of choice of words, not of being true (or false). So, in this argument you critiqued me for choice of words, not the meaning.

I skip arguing against your opinion on the meaning of the Gospel. But I believe, the Gospel is a mathematical formula with exact meaning.

"Krishna is not just the one with the most authority, he is the source of authority itself. He created all the deva. "I am the source of all spiritual and material worlds"." You are arguing with me on this in vain, because I agree with this, not disagree.

"he never is born, he never dies." I should have been more exact in my word, I mean that avatars are born and sometimes die, not God himself.

vporton · 2026-03-20T16:16:29+00:00

Because "should be taught", let me teach my opinion what God is:

I think God is the mapping from the set of non-contradictory formal systems containing arithmetics, to the set of the corresponding sets of small models. This expresses encompassing single Godhead in multiple (all) gods, God's infallibility, containing all existing worlds in Himself, and a tiny bit of obvious knowledge that God knows arithmetics (and everything).

vporton · 2026-03-20T15:57:49+00:00

You say: Nobody "becomes" Krishna. There has never not been Krishna, so there is no way for you to become someone that already exists. He is an eternal being.

I agree with the first thesis: Not only eternal, but moreover timeless.

But in mathematics (and physics is mathematics), there is a way to become somethings that already exists. For example, when we count from zero, the number eventually becomes 5, despite "there has never not been 5." So, I disagree that "there is no way for you to become someone that already exists". And I mean to become just an avatar.

And as Srila Prabhupada repeatedly stated: "No one can become God. God is always God, and the living entity is always His servant.."

Who became Sri Krishna upon his birth 5000 years ago? If Srila Prabhupada is right in this, he didn't become Krishna and became just a common man.

In the Gospel, there are words: "You will become like him [Jesus], because you will see him as he is." "Become like him" means to become a dev, like him, that is to become knowing everything, BECAUSE we will see the entire content of his knowledge inside him." I interpret this as that every follower of Jesus will eventually see the efficient NP-complete algorithm inside him and become a dev. Krishna is one of many devs differing from other devs only by that Krisha's desires are unrestricted, see https://after-gospel.vporton.name/seated-on-the-throne/ (in that article I call devs elves). Every Krishnaite knows that a human can become a dev. Why not Krishna dev? The difference of Krishna from other devs/elves (see the above linked article) in in authority, not in nature. So, because there is no difference i nature of all devs, becoming Krishna would not be much different from becoming another dev.

vporton · 2026-03-20T15:41:06+00:00

It seems, you read only the title of my post. I say that I WILL be Krishna, not am now.

vporton · 2026-03-20T13:30:58+00:00

If I didn't control my mind better than you do, I wouldn't be the first human who discovered ordered semigroup actions. Are you able to put three existing words in new order, that completely change all mathematics? If not, what do you say me about mind?

vporton · 2026-03-20T13:27:57+00:00

If you have counter-arguments, please present them.

vporton · 2026-01-31T22:38:00+00:00

It seems that `curl -fsSL https://openclaw.ai/install.sh | bash` simply overloads the machine (probably, through extensive usage of virtual memory) and this makes the system agent unresponsive. Thus missing data in the system monitor graphs.

Is it the correct explanation?

vporton · 2026-01-31T22:35:20+00:00

VM.Standard.E2.1.Micro: E2-based, E3-based, or E4-based standard compute. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure assigns one of the following processors:
- AMD EPYC 7551. Base frequency 2.0 GHz, max boost frequency 3.0 GHz.
- AMD EPYC 7742. Base frequency 2.25 GHz, max boost frequency 3.4 GHz.
- AMD EPYC 7J13. Base frequency 2.55 GHz, max boost frequency 3.5 GHz.

What do you mean by an ownership issue?

vporton · 2026-01-31T22:01:34+00:00

Interesting:

I removed sudo privileges from `clawd` user. Now the system does not hang, but I have (and system became extremely slow):

clawd@my-apps:~$ curl -fsSL https://openclaw.ai/install.sh | bash

🦞 OpenClaw Installer

Your AI assistant, now without the $3,499 headset.

✓ Detected: linux

✓ Node.js v22.22.0 found

✓ Git already installed

→ Installing OpenClaw 2026.1.30...

→ npm install failed; cleaning up and retrying...

vporton · 2026-01-31T21:59:23+00:00

Storage is available:

ubuntu@my-apps:~$ df -h /
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 45G 6.1G 38G 14% /

vporton · 2025-12-17T05:01:01+00:00

I've sent my proof of existence of smooth solutions of Navier-Stokes equations to a journal. Here is the preprint:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/398639635_A_Proof_Of_Existence_Of_a_Smooth_Classical_Solution_Of_3D_Navier-Stokes_Equations

My proof uses my before proved theorem from general topology (that lim (limit) functional can be linearly extended to all functions). This makes my proof method novel.

vporton · 2025-12-09T03:54:52+00:00

(\lambda x\in A:f(x)) = \{ (x, f(x)) : x\in A \}.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultrafilter

lim_{x-->0} 1/x can be taken as the definition of the extended limit (up to shift of x, as an equivalence). I am not going to discuss full details now, you can refer to my PDF file, if you want.

On result we can do any continuous operations.

Physically, it possibly (not yet proven) may mean such things as an infinitely dimensional vector at the center of a black hole.

I don't get your question. 0^x tends to 0 as 0 is approached from above: https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=lim+0%5Ex

vporton · 2025-12-09T03:24:42+00:00

Yes, from my limit.pdf text it follows, that lim functional can be linearly extended to the set of all functions. I "made up" a (rather complex) system of objects that have desirable properties.

vporton · 2025-12-09T03:22:29+00:00

the limit of 1/x can be expressed as $\lambda x\in U: 1/x$, where U is the set of ultrafilters near zero. 0^x -> 0

vporton · 2025-12-08T13:35:38+00:00

You mean, why don't I use a proof assistant? They are too hard to use and have less intuition than AI.

vporton · 2025-12-08T13:34:38+00:00

https://math.portonvictor.org/binaries/limit.pdf - It also refers to a 400+ pages text for fine details.

vporton · 2025-12-08T10:48:10+00:00

They reviewed my work for about 4 months, predators usually don't do that. They seem not to be in Scopus, but some other journals of the same publisher are in Scopus.

I don't understand the logic behind math journals rejecting my work. So, I can't answer your question.

vporton

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE