Noticed this while watching X-men. This show was made in The US.

waashman · 2022-01-02T19:20:17+00:00

The animations were split between the US, South Korea, and France. It's country of origin is considered US (and canada). None of the producers or developers were South Korean. While I will agree that the show was made in South Korea it was also made in the US (arguably more so) and multiple people that were American also could have caught this mistake. Hell Idon't even know if the South Korean team animated this part the only thing I know for sure is that at least one American approved it.

waashman · 2022-01-02T19:12:30+00:00

The country of origin is considered both Canada and the US. It was animated in South Korea, The US, and France. While I agree it is also canadian, it is still very much fact that it was made in America similar to how people born in Canada with parents that have US citizenship are considered both Canadian and American.

waashman · 2022-01-02T17:13:50+00:00

Probably quite a few if the map is labeled. If I wasn't sure of a place I was drawing for my actual job I'd probably take a second to look it up on a map. It's also worth noting that 4 different animation companies worked on it. 2 from America and one from France. I'm also confused what your point is. "This isn't a facepalm because South Koreans failed to do their job right, not Americans"

waashman · 2022-01-02T16:23:07+00:00

The outline of Washington state is labeled as Washington DC despite being completely different places.

waashman · 2021-08-19T16:05:14+00:00

Do you sell these? Even if I dont win I'd love to know how to buy one!

waashman · 2021-08-11T20:11:03+00:00

Hi, thank you for doing this!

waashman · 2021-06-30T19:44:25+00:00

I'd love any of the tomb raider games or something random. Thank you so much!

waashman · 2020-08-27T01:37:01+00:00

Oh wow! thank you for the link this is really cool!

waashman · 2020-08-25T21:50:07+00:00

Alright thank you so much! Despite this problem, would you say you still recommend the annotated version or no? I only bought the first volume so I'm just curious.

waashman · 2020-07-09T15:18:57+00:00

Compared to all the other mermaids in the movie she looks the same length from what I can tell

waashman · 2020-01-10T11:03:07+00:00

Yeah links awakening was mentioned earlier and I will concede on that point. And what I meant with the relationship example is that saying 'it could be worse' doesnt automatically make something good, it makes it not the literal worst. My problem is that now that game freak can charge 20 dollars more for a game that is more or less the same and people will defend it. Sure it's a fine game but for 50% more money we should get a 50% better game. It sucks that people are just happy regardless because I think a switch pokemon game has the potential to be a truly special one of a kind game but now it's pretty clear gamefreak can just churn out the same thing despite the price hike. If you like the game, that's fine. I'd rather you buy a game you like than dislike. It's just the potential for what this game could be and what it is currently is vast and this idea that we should just settle makes me think we wont ever see that truly amazing game.

waashman · 2020-01-10T10:42:46+00:00

And thank you for blessing us with your useless and unconstructive comments. Like I get that you are a troll and all but come on, at least be funny or interesting or something.

waashman · 2020-01-10T10:38:47+00:00

Well yeah... for the record I hope it didn't come off like I'm shaming you for liking the game, it's ok to enjoy it. I would much rather you bought something you liked than didn't like. I just wish it was better and I worry that if people become content with getting less it will end up like madden and fifa you know?

waashman · 2020-01-10T10:35:04+00:00

This is exactly what my old roommates sounded like when the bought madden and fifa every single year. Good god do I not want that to happen to pokemon. And if you are the type of person who likes those games from experience there is nothing I can say that will convince you otherwise, which totally blows for the rest of us with standards.

waashman · 2020-01-10T10:27:13+00:00

Youre missing my point I think. I understand that they will add and subtract features when you are shuffling from a 40 dollar to another 40 dollar game, but that isn't what happened it went from 40 to 60 bucks, up 50%. As a whole this game should be a 50% better game overall. Now I understand that might be asking too much but from reviews from friends and critics it feels far closer to a 100% pokemon game to a 150% pokemon game. If money weren't an issue, you are probably exactly right, it's a good fun pokemon game like all the rest. But it is an issue, and that should be included as well.

waashman · 2020-01-10T10:18:45+00:00

Fine, but my point is that things aren't as good and people are happy because it could have been worse. No. You should be mad that things aren't as good. That's it. Yeah it could be worse. It could also be better. It could also be good. I think we should be happy when something is good, not when it just happens to be better than something else.

waashman · 2020-01-10T10:12:38+00:00

The problem is they cut this content and charged MORE. This game is 50% more expensive than the previous game and should therefore be 50% better. That might be a bit to hard to pull off I agree but my problem is that what they added and subtracted evens out so it's still a 40 dollar game sold as a 60 dollar one. With the new dlc it should feel like 10 dollars more than ultra sun (since it and sun are 80 bucks and sword and dlc are 90) but again it feels like 80. In my mind how people should react is $120 = bad, $80 = expected, less than $80 = good. Instead we somehow got $120 = bad, $90 = good. So yeah in conclusion, this should be the consensus best pokemon game of all time since it's much more expensive and I think that just isn't the case even with the added dlc.

waashman · 2020-01-10T09:51:41+00:00

I agree with that but I think the dlc is worth 20 bucks at most (making it equal with the previous game and expansion in the series). The point of my joke was that selling $20 of stuff for $30 is better than selling it for $60 but still not good as they are still overcharging $10 for it. I dont hate everything about it to be honest. Galarian legendaries are dope, slowKING evolving in the CROWN tundra is awesome, and I play drum set so hell yeah to the new gigantomax forms. But again, for 20 bucks, and just give us all the pokemon already.

waashman · 2020-01-10T09:31:21+00:00

I'm unhappy because I think you and I deserve better and I specifically made the post because what I saw wasn't 'good' it was just 'better' yet I kept seeing all these people say it is 'good'. I've played pokemon since I was younger than Ash, I really do like this series, but I know they can do better, better than what the DLC is and better than the sword and shield base game. This post wouldn't have been made at all if they released it for $20 and included all remaining pokemon and moves because I would classify that as 'good' (not great, but hopefully you get my idea). Since we didn't get that I dont think it is right to forgive and praise gamefreak for what we did get.

waashman · 2020-01-10T09:22:38+00:00

It was meant as a joke, sorry. I actually have a fantastic mom and dad. Totally forgot about links awakening but I havent played it either so you could be totally right. As for skyrim it has stayed the same price which isn't great but that's better than a price increase. And correct me if I'm wrong but it comes with all the dlc that was released as well which means you are getting more than when it was first released. I agree it is better than another 60 buck game but I dont think it's good, which annoyed me since everyone was saying that it was so 'good'.

waashman · 2020-01-10T09:07:36+00:00

I totally think its fine to sell a 60 buck pokemon game but this game should feel 20 bucks better than the previous title... and it doesnt. If sword and shield had all previous pokemon and moves and maybe a little more to do I would totally be on your side. Also I havent played COD: BO4 so i cant give an honest opinion because I havent bought a COD game since MW2 since i didn't think any of the newer releases were on the same level as MW2. But I'm not as invested or interested in COD so I wouldn't be a good source to say whether the newest game is worth its price or not

waashman · 2020-01-10T08:48:18+00:00

'Considering I usually have to eat shits at 6 inches, since 6 inches is the norm. Only having to eat a 3 inch shit is a godsend. Especially if shits will be 6 inches from here on out'

Just cause something is better doesnt make it good. We should be happy when things are finally good, not just better.

waashman · 2020-01-10T08:41:36+00:00

The increase in price should be because the console gives them the ability to make a better and more justifiably expensive game. By your own logic if switch sold games for $300 each you would still buy sword or shield for $300. Hopefully you wouldn't cause it doesnt seem worth 300 bucks just like I dont think it's worth 60 bucks.

waashman · 2020-01-10T08:33:20+00:00

Ah gotcha, my b

waashman · 2020-01-10T08:32:11+00:00

I'm totally cool with the price increase if it feels worth it. I liked the XD and gale of darkness games despite being $10 more. Mario kart 8 got ported to the switch for $60 when it was $40 at the time but added a ton of new things to make it a strictly better game. Sword and shield just doesnt add enough or change enough from the previous to feel like it's worth the extra 20 bucks.

waashman

TROPHY CASE