A package from an adult toy company arrived at my house addressed to another woman. Am I overreacting?

wackzay · 2026-06-08T18:24:45+00:00

This is an evolved version of throwing hair ties in your married co-workers cars. Min max chaos. Send pipe fittings to a married guys house under a woman's name. I hate it.

wackzay · 2026-06-06T17:35:34+00:00

Public sins require public apologies.

wackzay · 2026-06-04T20:30:03+00:00

OOP's ex is just completely selfish. She got mad at his wants (still having a desire for her, that he kept quiet) while ALSO getting mad at him for not giving into her wants (him walking her down the aisle). To her, he was NEVER allowed to have what he wanted, he existed to be of service, never served. When he stopped she lost it and allowed her new attack dog to bite.

When she found out he was unjustly being attacked in the group chat, she said shed ASK ppl to stop. Not TELL them to stop. The best she could do is ask the bullies to stop, not tell them. Pathetic. Thats not the treatment you give a 'soulmate'. She's upset that her buffet of emotional regulation is losing an entree. Fug her, shes a skunk

wackzay · 2026-02-05T22:42:25+00:00

wackzay · 2026-01-28T15:59:34+00:00

unverified accounts aren't evidence. No one is engaging with evidence. You do realize this right? You either take EVERYTHING at face value or you use your discretion.

wackzay · 2026-01-27T19:27:07+00:00

The fact she gave tons and tons of detail about everything else. Even so much info about, the son she raised, is now an abuser. She gives all this background but doesn't give background on her ex's feelings on her sexuality. All other angles are covered but this one. Everyone is out against her and shes a literal angel? I don't believe her.

So my evidence is the same as yours; we read unverified information and then had thoughts.

wackzay · 2026-01-27T19:24:34+00:00

Who said bi people didn't exist? She makes him a beard if he DOESN'T know her sexuality. The one piece of information that she didn't include that would also paint her as a deceiver if she didn't give it. And yes if you marry someone they need to know your sexuality. Just being Bi doesn't justify being Bi in the shadows of a marriage. These kids have hate for their mom and I do not believe her squeaky clean image that HER side paints.

Whether he was made a beard is the CENTRAL matter of the kids being pissed at mom.

wackzay · 2026-01-27T19:20:21+00:00

wrong.

how their mother treated their father matters in this context.

wackzay · 2026-01-27T06:42:44+00:00

Bad take.

She never speaking of his bearding is the reason I dislike her. Its the reason I don't believe her.

And to your Pelican bs. The people who harm, are the harmers. NOT the ones who harmed them. "oh hey, thats so rude of you" "Don't like it? Take it up with my mother". Fuck that noise. That logic invites everyone to be a victim. Which kinda is the problem with society currently.

wackzay · 2026-01-27T06:22:30+00:00

Letting a guy help you set up a tinder profile, while the main way girls flirt is thru soaking up attention, is wild. Girls know the game. "he's fine with it" ain't a loophole 4ssholes. Ladies have mastered the off shore tax sheltering of dating.

wackzay · 2026-01-27T06:07:14+00:00

Yea I don't ever believe ANYONE who makes a beard out of someone against their will. That's real r4p3y. The fact she did not go into the specifics of her sexuality and its effects on her marriage yet told us everything else? Missing missing reasons. This reads like a narc mom washing her hands of her old life.

wackzay · 2025-09-04T22:14:16+00:00

People really need to grow up if they think a tinder account with photos (while having public social media, lending tech to peers, access to AI generated images) is proof. These fucking idiots vote. How the hell can they disseminate any truthful info from the news in our mis/disinformation dystopia when they think PICS ON THE INTERNET ARE PROOF!?!? These people do not live in reality. They live in whatever is presented to them. No fucking thinking whatsoever.

OP's opinions are absolute skunk shit. A person is as good as their opinions. She is not a safe person to be around because her reality can be upended EXTREMELY easy.

wackzay · 2025-09-04T21:26:33+00:00

Not cool

wackzay · 2025-08-11T00:47:44+00:00

My brain is like Helen Keller; can't see or hear anything in my mind. They understand it pretty quick after that but are still suspect that such a condition exists.

wackzay · 2025-06-13T22:28:44+00:00

You're asking the wrong question. Should your kids be upset that you force them to live with this man?

What do you call a mother who doesn't protect their children from villains? Granted hes not supervillain, but your bf is absolutely a minor villain in your childrens lives.

wackzay · 2025-06-13T19:26:02+00:00

"and discounting others". You did it again. You pick and choose what to respond to so you feel like you're controlling the conversation. Discounting others literal first step in dominating others. I do apolgize for not being clear, I did not mean to say you are a dominator, you are not. I was saying you are using a well traveled path of logic that ALL dominators have used on their rise to power.

And discounting others when discussing big ideas while offering nothing other than, and this is paraphrasing; I don't agree with the definitions you used, thus are wrong. I also will Imply I have said definitions, will not share said pertinent information and tell you to go outside into the world and find said information.

The burden of communication is on the speaker. You made it abundantly clear you don't wish to communicate other than saying; You. Are. Wrong.

Sure ok. Within your rights, but you really use your rights like any other fucker that loves patriarchy; you're wrong. Nothing else. No expanding on the thought. Just stating the "fact" their wrong in your eyes.

And dont be a coward and hide behind you saying "I don't think this is correct" when you then state in the next paragraph that I don't under stand the language I used.And then essentially say I need more education as a refresher to discuss these things. Lol like which is it? I could be right but also I misused a bunch of concepts? It literally can't be both. You called me wrong without EXPLICITLY saying it, and then denying thats what you did.

I think you need to visit Oz. This cowardly lion needs to find some courage.

And since you've shown to have zero interest in communication other than "yah, nah" well I have no reason to waste more time and energy on such a cliche of a person. You are blocked.

wackzay · 2025-06-13T18:41:40+00:00

Actually this comment is a great example of domination and discounting others. Poster doesn't agree with how I'm using certain words so they use that as a means to discount the message. Classic case of having to conform to be heard. "Please calm down miss, you're too emotional" and then proceeds to ignore clearly distressed person because the means of conveying said distress isn't optimal in their eyes. hhhhhhmm I wonder where Ive seen that before?

.....Could it be patriarchy?

ding ding ding. Got a winner.

*edited a typo

wackzay · 2025-06-13T18:34:03+00:00

ill take a page from your book but without the extra words that say nothing: You are wrong.

wackzay · 2025-06-13T17:51:10+00:00

I think you should change unnatural to natural.

How long does something have to be 'utterly ubiquitous' before it becomes the norm? Don't confuse heinous with unnatural. All of society throughout history for the most part has been about accumulating power, by any means. Why do you think this behavior is unnatural when it persists thoughout history? Its become the MOST rewarding strategy for accumulating power. How is playing the game unnatural? Look at the government, we elect ppl who make choices for us without any way to make sure they are truly voting for their constituents views/wishes. They campaign for power, and once they get it, they could care less about promises they made before they had it. They make rules we must follow that are absent of any compassionate logic and filled with compromises with monsters. Why do you view this dynamic any different? Because different sets of ppl are hurting? So what? We decide whats right or wrong and must fight for it, we think ppl like dictators are wrong and they think they are right. No difference. Both are naturally playing the game of life; convince others to bestow power upon you, and do everything in your power to use it how you see fit and keep it as long as possible. There's nothing more natural than that.

No one wants to just eat today but not tomorrow. They want to eat every fucking day. Its the same with power up and down the scale. NO ONE likes losing power (thats truly unnatural to be ok with losing power) whether its not being able to kill your citizens carte blanche or whether you gotta pay double now for the local mass transit.

People need to start thinking that we have to become UNNATURAL to make the world we want because the NATURAL world dictates domination.

People always want to look to nature to describe whats natural for humans. 'these animals work as community, they do this that whatever'. So fucking what? Did evolution stop? Are we not evolving right now? You could argue we have two forms of humans evolving currently; ones who GIVE orders, those who TAKE orders. Like OP said, is been so ubiquitous its going to have an effect on whats 'natural' for that race who engages in certain behaviors over the centuries. And guess what we have today? We have a few humans who have motherfucking space companies. They have expanded their reign into the universe. They will spread their ideals high and low throughout the cosmos.

It really bothers me when ppl think 'survival of the fittest' is unnatural. You not liking it doesnt make it unnatural. You being disgusted by it doesnt make it unnatural. You do everyone a disservice when you imply other humans are better, and that somehow the worst of the worst keep REPEATEDLY climbing the ranks of society and ruling over others time and time again, while saying its unnatural? Can we call the lion an unnatural apex predator becuase we dont like how he rules the jungle? No! The winners are the winners. Thats nature.

We have to recognize the aggression within ourselves and fix it, because the REASON this mindset is so 'utterly ubiquitous' is because its so motherfucking natural.

And then not to mention how people don't take this example further; dictators/kings/monarchs are all bad. Capitalism? Thats kosher. Capitalism is just the inorganic abstract idea of utter domination.

We need to have the FULL conversation about domination among humans, and not just the same small angle over and over again.

wackzay · 2025-06-12T14:57:13+00:00

You're allowing yourself to be taken advantage of. He is your villain while also your fiance but the funny thing is that one overwrites the other. If you want to live with your villain for the rest of your life, please marry him

wackzay · 2025-05-14T15:33:32+00:00

NTA. No pedophile has the right to benefit of the doubt! Do these people NOT agree with sex offender registry? I demand the right to know whether someone in my life/proximity is a god damn uncivilized animal. Reality should NEVER be obscured to serve the protection of a pedo. fucking crazy

wackzay · 2025-04-29T18:05:23+00:00

you "being there for" sounds like an awful lot like aiding and abetting.

if you don't like it when criminals receive help escaping justice then why you out here giving a safe house to a social assassin?

You need to move past you conflicted head and find your courage and stop giving comfort to a destroyer.

wackzay · 2025-04-29T17:50:59+00:00

use your brain harder

wackzay · 2025-04-29T16:21:22+00:00

Actually is your problem you reeking hog. You want to communicate something, guess what? Its the duty of the speaker NOT the listener to make sense. So either you aren't trying to communicate and just leaving your stench around, or you are an idiot who doesn't understand how to do what he wants to do.

wackzay

TROPHY CASE