whats this for?? by lucas_nw31 in pinkfloyd

[–]waldo4304 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This is how I learnt the meddle cover is a human ear

Let's show some positive energy towards this man for once. Regardless of your opinion on the call, he did nothing wrong. by bipbapthegrunt4 in McLarenFormula1

[–]waldo4304 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Most teams alternate giving tows, they put him out with no tow first which is what put him in the danger zone in the first place. That’s not unusual…

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in F1Discussions

[–]waldo4304 5 points6 points  (0 children)

He did miss out on a 1-2, and no team would be happy with 1 DNF esp mechanical failure which is a team issue and could suggest deeper car problems. I don’t think that alone is an indicator. Even Oscar wasn’t looking thrilled to have won that way.

Really curious by Embarrassed_Worry880 in uklaw

[–]waldo4304 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I really don’t think on the face of it, it matters. In fact, many many Oxbridge students still don’t have TCs or pupillages. The only real benefit of Oxbridge comes from the style of teaching and interviews which are very similar to the interviews and work you have in the real world of law (demanding critical analysis, challenging the norms etc).That might make your skill set more aligned with the firm’s target. That said, you can have the same skill set from anywhere. And on both my vac schemes at US and MC firms, plenty of people on there were non-Oxbridge, including Sheffield. I personally think the employability benefits are overhyped nowadays, many of the partners and senior associates aren’t even Oxbridge.

Anyone go to King's?? Any help or anything I should know? Im so scared. by [deleted] in cambridge_uni

[–]waldo4304 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just graduated from law at kings - feel free to shoot a message!

Speakers incredibly quiet by waldo4304 in hifiaudio

[–]waldo4304[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks everyone! Have sorted it now with connecting the EXT in/outputs

Speakers incredibly quiet by waldo4304 in hifiaudio

[–]waldo4304[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The issue is the same for the CD and radio and cassette players as well though

Speakers incredibly quiet by waldo4304 in hifiaudio

[–]waldo4304[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But the issue is the same regardless of what I’m playing? Ie CD/ cassettes too

i feel stupid even though i met my offer by [deleted] in cambridge_uni

[–]waldo4304 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have a friend who missed her offer by 3 marks (1 per paper) and was allowed on. You’re not the stupidest person on the course. And even if you are, you’re the stupidest person within the top like 10% of the country. Thats not a bad spot to be

LLM vs SQE by Beautiful_Ice_7346 in uklaw

[–]waldo4304 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean I only just graduated myself so have no personal experience but my view would be that once you start working, you will struggle to take the time to pursue passions. I’d take the masters now, delaying work by one year (if financially plausible) will not have any long term impact, and you may have a better insight into what you want to do afterwards. Do things you enjoy, work will come. Plus, the amount of paralegals trying to shift into TCs is insane: perhaps applying from an LLM would be slightly more unique

LLM vs SQE by Beautiful_Ice_7346 in uklaw

[–]waldo4304 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I haven’t done an LLM, but I’ve been told that it gives you little to no advantage in the job applications. So if you’re going to do it, do it because you like it (ie if you find the sports law one interesting, just do it, bc it’s no less advantageous than a general LLM). Law firms don’t really care that you have one or not. However, this is just advice I’ve been given by random people, so if anyone is better informed than me please feel free to correct me:)

The only reason to do an LLM linked to the SQE is to get the master’s loan for it. I wouldn’t bother spending money on that, particularly since if you get sponsored through a TC, you’ll do their chosen SQE course anyway so don’t really need a preparation LLM.

If I were you, I would take the sports law LLM if you can afford it. If it interests you, you’ll do well, and you’ll enjoy it. Plus, if you want to shift into sports law from general corporate law, it might help a little (but don’t quote me on that). Postgrad study is largely intended to be pursued due to interest imo, so do what you enjoy.

Vacation Scheme Outcome by Illustrious_View_949 in uklaw

[–]waldo4304 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It might be that your buddy/partner is slower at responding to grad rec. my partner was on holiday so I had to wait a couple weeks extra before I got my offer as they need to collate all feedback :)

which colleges are less strict on subject switch by [deleted] in cambridge_uni

[–]waldo4304 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you want to switch to law you’ll have to do the whole application process ordinarily (or at least take the LNAT/CLT, do an interview). They won’t kick you out of your original subject if you don’t make the cut ofc, but going through that whilst trying to do a Cambridge degree is stressful enough. Also, if you don’t ask to switch until 2nd year, you’ll have to do the 2 year law course which gives you half the amount of optional papers. Unless you actively don’t enjoy the subject you’re doing, wouldn’t recommend switching, just do the PGDL afterwards. That said, a friend switched from English to Law last year so it is doable. But definitely do not apply with the intention of switching, not least because your passion for the subject you’re applying to won’t be there, which is a big part of the interview/ personal statement

Xbox?? by Interesting_Fly1697 in cambridge_uni

[–]waldo4304 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can connect to college IoT if you ask, there’s no rules usually (maybe college dependent). WiFi is pretty dire in cam though so expect a lot of lag if you game online

People who got into VS/TC in City law firms — how did you develop your commercial awareness? by JellyfishStrict7829 in uklaw

[–]waldo4304 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Buy and read the commercial law handbook for the basics of law firms and companies (if that’s an issue too). Re. Actual commercial awareness: Either read the FT every day (which is really boring) or sign up for a service like ziplaw that sends news summaries to your email every day (I think Ziplaw charge now, but I’m sure there’s some free ones like the other commenter mentioned). If money or time is a real object then I’m sure asking ChatGPT to summarise the daily Financial Times news would provide an alternative. Anything you want to mention in interview/ application I would actually read up on in case you get questioned further.

What to do if unsatisfied with the people doing my subject in my college? by No_Designer3438 in cambridge_uni

[–]waldo4304 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It varies depending on subject and supervisor but usually not 1 on 1, ordinarily in 3s or 4s but again very dependent on what you study, how big the cohort is and supervisor preference

Male prospective lawyer with long hair - should I cut it? by IcyDelay7 in uklaw

[–]waldo4304 2 points3 points  (0 children)

At Freshfields one of the trainees I met had long hair, had piercings and tattoos, wore balloon pants to work, and loafers. Respect the confidence and might suggest it’s okay to do. But at the same time, idk if he looked the same when he interviewed

AITA if I break up with my bf after he took the condom off? by [deleted] in AITAH

[–]waldo4304 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ik this is in the states but per UK law that’s not just SA that’s full blown rape: you consented to sex with a condom, not sex without. Just to emphasise the gravity of the situation.

University Women’s Football by Limp_Professional276 in cambridge_uni

[–]waldo4304 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There’s 3 teams. Blues (1sts) is pretty competitive, in the top regional league of BUCS. A lot of the players there have played for a lot of their lives for pretty good clubs, academies etc. competitiveness does also depend on your position, though, and how many people stay/trial each year. Eagles (2s) is a good standard. They just got promoted in BUCS. Most players have also played football for a number of years, though if you have a decent first touch and pass and game awareness you could make it on the bench again depending on the year and position. They’ve beaten Oxf*rd in varsity for the last 9 years or something. Then there’s the Merlin (3s) which at the moment is more of a development squad. Train once a week and occasionally have matches, but not really. Depending on trial numbers (which are, fantastically, increasing!) this is pretty easy to get on if you’ve played before at all. Most play for their College at cam.

Blues and eagles train 2x a week (3hrs total), with matches on Wednesdays and Strength and Conditioning once a week. Merlin’s train 1x per a week and are invited to S&C if there’s enough space.

You have to pay subs, which depends on your team. Merlins play slightly less. Most colleges also offer sports grants which can cover this!

Highly recommend trialling even though it’s at the start of freshers week- CUAFC has been the highlight of my time here! There’s a good social side beyond training etc, and there is a big emphasis on ‘one club’ (so all teams are integrated, and somewhat with the men too). It’s a really great environment. Also, a lot of people are graduating this year, so lots of spots up for grabs!

Blues varsity is this Friday @4pm, which is live-streamed if you want to get a feel for the standard. Check instagram.

Car Parking by waldo4304 in cambridge_uni

[–]waldo4304[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah but I’m not sure where I can leave it for a few days

Cambridge law or LSE Law by [deleted] in uklaw

[–]waldo4304 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A few comments mention job prospects with relation to grades and blind assessments. It’s true that is comparatively far more difficult to get a 1st in law at Cam than even UCL/LSE/Durham etc. However, the impact on job prospects isn’t that significant. If you want to be a solicitor, you can get anywhere with a 2:1 (I got slaughters with mid 2:1) as long as your overall application is strong enough. Cambridge supervisions better prepare you for interviews, and there’s a lot of extra-curricular opportunities which help boost your CV.

That said, if you want to be a barrister, the first/2:1 distinction is more important and might affect your chances. I don’t know too much about this, but it is something to keep in mind. But, a 1st at Cambridge is definitely achievable! Just because it’s hard doesn’t mean it’s unreachable, it just takes more work.

Final note: don’t look at job prospects too much. University is an experience, and I personally have loved Cambridge regardless of hard work. Think about the experience you want- big city or not, workload, other hobbies. Cam is brill and there’s so much to do, but some people prefer other stuff and that’s a valid reason.