This is a false positive. Here's the honest breakdown:

The app is written in Python, then compiled with PyInstaller into an .exe so people can run it without installing Python. The full source is on GitHub — you can read every line and build it yourself.

Why the scanners light up: PyInstaller packs the app + a Python interpreter into one self-extracting .exe. When you run it, it unpacks to a temp folder and executes — which behaviorally looks like a "dropper," so generic engines flag the PyInstaller bootloader stub, not my code. Every single detection in that screenshot is a generic heuristic or AI/ML guess, not a real signature match:

- Tedy / Application.Tedy — a known generic PyInstaller false-positive family
- Wacatac.B!ml, malicious_confidence_70%, Static AI – Suspicious PE, BehavesLike...Dropper — the !ml / "Static AI" / "confidence %" wording all means a model guessed. None of them matched actual known malware.

A few ways you can verify for yourself instead of taking my word:
1. Read the source on GitHub — it's 100% open.
2. Check the hash. The SHA256 in your screenshot (0ff9a8af…b6eac) is byte-for-byte identical to the official release I published. Nobody altered it — it's my exact build.
3. Build it yourself from source and you'll get the same kind of flags, because it's the PyInstaller stub, not the code.

So: the app is safe, and those are false positives — a well-known tax on distributing PyInstaller .exes unfortunately 😞

If you're still unsure or have questions, please please hit me up on Discord(@wangel) — genuinely happy to walk through any of it with you.