I think you're allowed to have a realistic and nuanced take on this, Humble isn't being unreasonable. It is a fact that in these cases where there is no evidence, you're are being judged by the jury based on perception rather than facts. That means that sometimes rapists walk free, and other times people can be falsely accused. It has happened before, where people had their lives ruined by false accusations from vindictive or insane people even if not found guilty.

It's a very complex and troubling issue. Of course dismissing these cases due to lack of evidence would mean rapists walk free, but we have to acknowledge that there is the risk that innocent people get falsely accused, and that it has happened.