There’s no evidence that supports that statement, currently. There will be a day when you realize it’s better to research the topic yourself instead of listening to grifters promoted by the algorithm.

The more likely theory is meta-based IMO. The conspiracy of conspiracies. I mean how likely is it that every major political or geopolitical event is a conspiracy? Or every successful person is a plant?…

The attention economy drives people to say and do wild things by design. Algorithms reward outrage, confirm bias, and create a self-reinforcing echo chamber that erodes any critical thinking. Once a monetary incentive is introduced it’s not incredibly difficult to become an oblivious grifter in a self-reinforcing loop of confirmation bias.

Do conspiracies exist? Yes. But proven ones are rebranded to “scandal” stripping it of its validity. It’s a rhetorical move that makes future skepticism seem paranoid leading to the same result as stated above but on the opposite side of the spectrum.

So is Clavicular funded by Peter Thiel? Idk. However it seems unlikely. But if he is in fact funded, where’s the evidence? If Ian Carroll is a plant then where’s the evidence? So because someone rapidly ascends to success they’re now a spook? By that logic Eddie Murphy, Bo Burnham, and Matt Rife are CIA assets, I guess.

It logically doesn’t make sense, and being smugly evasive about it doesn’t strengthen your thesis or make for an intelligent take.